You may also like
12 ans d'âge torrent reviews
Zachary N (ag) wrote: Though it fully realizes its satirical ambitions with wittily used cameos and numerous Hollywood clich debunking - not to mention its "perfect" ending, it's also severely padded with an uninspired plot that it believes is more necessary than not. Ultimately, not as masterful or as accomplished as Network but pretty close all things considered.
Daniel D (es) wrote: Quatro candidatos a Juiz Federal vo para o Rio fazer uma prova... e no meio do caminho acabam se metendo em diversas confuses... comprando gabarito....
Aaron H (ru) wrote: The last 15 mins spoilt this film..
Alejandro C (nl) wrote: La historia es irrelevante, como era de esperar. Pero los bailes son espectaculares, aunque el breakdance no sea santo de mi devocin
Mark R (nl) wrote: Horrifying story about life in the slums of Haiti. Once again I want to say how glad I am to live in a small rural town; I'm safe and get to live without fear.
Bolly B (de) wrote: I can't stop laughing when I see Budderball completely drunk... Let me take all these puppies at home with me!!!
Fagatron P (jp) wrote: Jesse... the only reason to watch this film. Just wish they had more footage of him in speedos.
Alexander C (jp) wrote: Would like to get round to seeing!
SteL P (ag) wrote: Javier Bardem is remarquable.I dont like Schnabel as a director though. I dont like the way he directs and i dont like his narration.I dont quite understand what are Sean Penn& Johnny Depp doing in the movie, even thoug they are both fantastic and seeing Johnny Depp touching himself is priceless!
Allen G (es) wrote: A cameo-fest of fun sing-alongs mixed with a wacky plot filled with madness. The problem is that's it's not original- this is a pretty shameful remake of a classic that lacks any real imagination or smarts. Too much of it amounts to weak comedy shot awkwardly while one waits for some music to play. It's worth a watch, mostly for all the cool cameos but it's a big disappointment to fans of the original. A prime example of what a sequel shouldn't be but almost always is. Still, awesome cameos and good soundtrack.
Amandeep S (au) wrote: This "classic" movie is nothing spectacular at all. It's not very entertaining to watch at all, atleast not in this more modern era where good special effects are the norm unlike in the past. The dinosaurs' were cool to see at first but it gets old fast. The plot is interesting but very predictable. The characters were very bland but I expected that in a movie like this. I was probably the last person on Earth to see this movie but I honestly had no interest going in to it and pretty much forced myself to watch it since it's a movie everyone's seen but me. Overall, imo the movie was pretty damn boring with some exciting scenes with the dinosaurs. But maybe I just have to watch it again idk. FYI, Samuel L. Jackson was probably the best part of this movie.
John A (au) wrote: Shocker Is An Often Overlooked Wes Craven Horror. The Film's Plot Is Decent & Sports An Unknown Cast. Craven Applies His Formula Used To Create A Nightmare On Elm Street Here And Comes Out With This Fun & Enjoyable Attempt. The Script Is Quite Good As Well As The Acting & Special Effects. In My Opinion This May Not Show That Craven Is A Master Of Horror, But It's An Awful Good Attempt To Create Another Horror Icon Which Sadly Fails As An Icon But Works As A One-Off Killer In This Movie.
Marian K (ca) wrote: Family dysfunction with a hopeful end
Pawan P (fr) wrote: Energy packed action thriller with the Angry Young Man Amitabh Bachchan.
Mohammed A (ag) wrote: It's good movie to watch
b d (mx) wrote: Review (1~5)#Content: Script 5 | Acting 5 | Cinematography 5 | Film Editing 5#Visual: Costume Design 4 | Makeup & Hairstyling 4 | Scenic Design 5 | Lighting 5 | Visual Effects 4#Sound: Score & Soundtracks 5 | Sound Editing & Mixing 5#Overall (1~10): 9