20,000 Days on Earth

20,000 Days on Earth

A semi-fictionalized documentary about a day in the life of Australian musician Nick Cave's persona.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:97 minutes
  • Release:2014
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:20,000 Days on Earth 2014 full movies, 20,000 Days on Earth torrents movie

Writer and musician Nick Cave marks his 20,000th day on the planet Earth. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


20,000 Days on Earth torrent reviews

Deke P (fr) wrote: saw it 12-2016. True story of boxing champ Vinny Pazienza.Liked it. well done. Helps, and is interesting, to google Paz and also watch some of his fights on YouTube

Sabeer H (au) wrote: My friends and I have plenty of "himmat" having sat through many a bad movie in our time. However we didn't have the "himmat" to sit through this nonsense of a movie. The disclaimer said no animals were harmed in the making of this movie but its the people who have suffered at the hands of this movie that they should be worried about. I am still suffering from PHSD (post himmatwala stress disorder).Nonsense plot, bad acting, worse jokes and awful soundtrack (mar uske bum pe laat jo tujhe darata hai). It's the makers who need a good kick up the backside.Never mind "himmat", keep your "izzat" and stay away from this movie.

Amanda B (br) wrote: It was an extra in this movie and until it came out I had no idea it was going to be so raunchy. I loved it though!

Sherry R (it) wrote: I liked this movie and understand why he did what he did.

Brody M (jp) wrote: I watched about 10 minutes of this movie & then I turned it off

Deadly V (ru) wrote: A Bitter and Sad Worldwide Contemporary Story, With Magnificent Performances. Strongly recommended to everyone...

Tyler S (kr) wrote: silly plot and the dubbing is average at best and the acting poor. That being said the action sequences and chans ability to do his own stunts and kick major tail are second to none. Chan is the movie.

Brady S (fr) wrote: One of the worst sequels I've ever seen. The green screen was shit. Everything was done 100% wrong in this movie. This and Jaws: The Revenge are the two of the worst sequels I've ever seen well, besides Spy Kids 4, Daddy Day Camp

Ethan B (ca) wrote: I know that most people know this, but I still find it amazing that it only cost Rodriguez $7000 to make this film! It's incredible and it's proof that storytelling and the writing are the most important things in engaging your audience. Although pretty violent, El Mariachi is a pretty clean cut movie that is a lot of fun to watch and free of a lot of BS that most other action films contain! The acting isn't great, but it works with the low budget feel of this film. There are a lot of awesome scenes in this unforgettable movie. After watching it you'll feel like everyone who hasn't seen it is missing out. Above all, the movie has a lot of self-awareness and never takes it self too seriously!Twizard Rating: 88

Henri P (br) wrote: Joutuu arvostamaan Kaurismaen kunnianhimoa tehdessaan La Vie De Bohemen Pariisissa ja kokonaan ranskaksi. Kokonaisuutena ehka hieman hajanainen, mutta kolmen taiteilijan jokapaivaisen strugglauksen kuvaus on Kaurismaen rappioromantiikkaa parhaimillaan. Pellonpaa tekee uransa hienoimpia rooleja sympaattisena maalarina.

Adam H (nl) wrote: Terrible. Fell far from the tree. Even the mechanical shark was nominated for worst actor.

Michael J (de) wrote: Brilliant cheesy First Blood Part 2- ripoff. Good fun...

Molly R (jp) wrote: Enjoyable and I always enjoy Judy Garland.

Geoff B (ca) wrote: An MGM college football musical done in Technicolor...found it just ok...not a real big fan of musicals...only watched it because I like June Allyson.

Trevor M (de) wrote: Take a Philip K. Dick espionage story, give it a cult classic director and the production style of a Terry Gilliam film and you will get Cypher. It is not a film easily digested due to its bizarreness and complexity, but if you have the will to keep watching, it yields a story has hypnotic as the mind-wiping corporations in it.- Details Breakdown -The Good: Many a sci-fi movie has broken down because the plot line was just plain too simple. Aliens are coming to kill us, so let's kill them first, there's a rift in the space / time continuum that needs to be patched, or there's this weird cube that turns machines into giant robots that needs to be found. Cypher could hardly be summed up in a page, much less a sentence. There is a constant fluctuation in what the audience thinks is the main plot of the story and the writers are clearly having way too much fun changing it up every 30-40 minutes. This method of storytelling lends itself rather well to this film considering it is a story about espionage and identity crisis. There is a lot to see in Cypher and a lot to think about afterwards. It is most certainly a movie that is best when watched more than once in order to full understand the complexities.This movie could be clearly labeled as a "Cult" movie due to the direction and visual style as well as the fact that with this kind of movie it is easy to have mixed feelings about it. Jeremy Northam does a great job playing multiple versions of the same character and progressively gets more and more likable. This film has a very eerie feel to it the entire time and the production style feels similar to Terry Gilliam movies such as Twelve Monkeys and Brazil with the strange colored lights, lab coats everywhere, and quirky "futuristic" technology. Cypher has a very strong Philip K. Dick story feel to it and so people who liked other movies based on his work (Minority Report, Adjustment Bureau) might view this as a Gilliam style Philip K. Dick story on a lower budget.The Bad: This film tiptoes the line between complex and confusing and often times dips more into the confusing side. There is a lot that is unexplained in this film and I mean A LOT, so the audience has to really let go of the millions of questions that will pop into their heads throughout the movie. Some will be answered by the end, but others will not. The love story in this film, which turns out to be the whole point of everything that happened, is extremely weak and almost meaningless. There is never any romantic moments between the characters or any chemistry of any kind. At one point one actually shoots the other. Not exactly a healthy relationship. The production style gets a little annoying in some places and just looks ridiculous. The acting is not that great for the most part, there is little emotion going on and anyone other than the main character are basically just there to progress the plot.

Nicholas L (jp) wrote: There is no reason anyone will not like "This means war". It is all good fun, ridiculous, with likeable leads and supporting cast. There is some police gun shots but compare to what's in the theatres, it is kindergarten stuff. Basically you can name this movie as "101 ways to woo a girl." Tom Hardy can actually smile? That is a revelation especially for fans who only knows him in Mad Max or Batman. He is very funny in an unassuming way. Are Chris Pine's electric blue eyes for real? Or is it some kind of special effects? Reese Witherspoon returns to what she does best (although she is a little too old for the part). Go and enjoy it.

shaun h (au) wrote: not crazy about remakes but this would be a nice one

Edam A (es) wrote: Virgin film makers should watch this as a lesson in how NOT to shoot a film. Zero energy coming from the cast and the flattest camera work known to man. Just awful. Plus it tries to rip off one of the greatest Sci Fi films ever and fails dramatically.