Why do drugs, crime, HIV, poor education, inferiority complexes, low expectations, poverty, corruption, poor health, and underdevelopment plague people of African descent around the world? Why, 500 years after the onset of Slavery and subsequent Colonialism, do Africans still struggle for basic freedom? Filmed in more than twenty countries across five continents, 500 YEARS LATER examines the atrocities that uprooted Africans from their cultures and homeland. Infused with the spirit and music of liberation, it chronicles the struggle of a people who fight for the most essential human right: freedom.
Crime, drugs, HIV/AIDS, poor education, inferiority complex, low expectation, poverty, corruption, poor health, and underdevelopment plagues people of African descent globally - Why? 500 ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Ethan L (ag) wrote: Underdeveloped and mostly miscast (aside from Pena). C-
allen s (kr) wrote: I liked the movie very much.
Sarah R (nl) wrote: ummmm... had potential with the storyline. Like I see where it could have gone but the poor acting and cheesiness ruined it for me.
Charles C (ru) wrote: Absolutely fucking stupid. The only worthwhile element is seeing Corey Feldman do his hammy vocal impression of Kirk Douglass or Solid Snake. I can't imagine even the fanbase getting in on this one.
Al H (de) wrote: Like the phantom menace, this movie is not so good.
LKate (ag) wrote: awesome movie! and has a really shocking ending.
Amethyst v (au) wrote: Period drama based on the immoral course of one woman and how it affected Venice when she was put on trial for seducing the men of Venice, A love story that sets her on a bad course.
Luc T (fr) wrote: My 4th favorite bond. Excellent!
Dulcey A (jp) wrote: I would have given this film at least 4 1/2 stars if it weren't for all of the technical flaws. The screenplay wasn't bad and the acting was good. There was some great chemistry between Lizabeth Scott and Dick Powell. Really, though, I have to say that Raymond Burr made this a movie worth watching. He was excellent in the sinister role of McDonald; he was perfect as the creepy stalker. I think this obscure gem is worth your time if you can overlook the subpar mise en cine, the mediocre cinematography, and the poor special fx.
Paul D (de) wrote: The pace is a little slow in places but generally this is a well told love story and a fantastic vehicle for Ginger Rogers to play the naive and confused woman in love.
Amused G (es) wrote: boring. with very flat and forced conversations
Sean D (ru) wrote: Pretty funny... but nothing real noteworthy
Canti C (fr) wrote: Excellent work of Sci-fi. It opens more questions that it answers and opens room for deep debate. A must watch if youre into sci-horror kind of movies
Arven A (ru) wrote: Excellent if rather narsty horror detective flick set in gaslight London and starring Johnny Depp. Brilliant!
Ben B (jp) wrote: The worst movie I have ever seen. You'll struggle to get through this one. The only saving grace is that you might laugh at how horrible it is.
Jacques v (de) wrote: mix of trainspotting and groundhog day
Shaun C (gb) wrote: Even though I knew better than to watch a Brosnan film, I still did ... Well 3 mins worth...Shit Script and just about shit everything else ... Man there's some shit films out there ...