When a cursed devil's charm' bracelet shows up at a sorority house on Valentine's Day, each girl tries to make a series of wishes, and each finds that unintended consequences are the primary purpose of Satan's sinister strategy. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
666: Devilish Charm
When a cursed devil's charm' bracelet shows up at a sorority house on Valentine's Day, each girl tries to make a series of wishes, and each finds that unintended consequences are the primary purpose of Satan's sinister strategy.
You may also like
666: Devilish Charm torrent reviews
Matt M (fr) wrote: polanski in some ways is a very unlucky guy. from loosing parents to the holocaust, to loosing his wife and child to the manson family and for being the only guy held responsible for having a good time in the early 70s.
Peter J (br) wrote: Even better with more line fleshed out. A must before seeing Smaug.
Aaron O (es) wrote: The Whistleblower full of crime drama cliches, starts quite slowly, and focuses too much on the lead character rather then the subject. Thankfully, the director has her heart in the right place, and overall the film effectively informs you about human trafficking, and Rachel Weisz gives quite a performance in the lead role.
Vlad M (it) wrote: Beautifully rendered nonsense
Zen N (jp) wrote: Not as good as Majid Majidi's other work.
Kyle M (de) wrote: Same enjoyment level as "Glory Road," but with more spirits. (A-)(Full review coming soon - with better wording probably)
Blake P (br) wrote: "Sneakers" is a caper film in tone and in spirit, but it's also a technological one, a conspiracy thriller that uses hacking as a plot device. Released in 1992, a time when the internet was still tentatively called an Information Superhighway and when computers were larger than Nicki Minaj's derriere, part of us wants to get a kick out of its dated, unsubtle ways of prominently displaying its electronic savviness, but part of us feels a little alienated - it seems to be a modern movie made for then-modern mid-1990s audiences. Aside from its technological flashes, sure to have been exciting for consumers who had not yet seen an iMac G3 in their lifetime, it's a romp with some personality to spread around, but not quite enough. It's a passable thriller, one we can tell was made with the conclusion that a sizable amount of big stars and a techno edge would be enough of a draw to distract from a lacking of spark. But as I watch "Sneakers" twenty-four years later on my 2015 model Apple MacBook, no gimmicks can fool me. The film opens in 1969, where college students Martin and Cosmo are hacking into computer networks (using university tools, no less) to relocate governmental conservative funds to liberal associations of their choosing. Under the impression that they're making right, no remorse peppers their illegal actions until the police arrive on the scene and arrest Cosmo for his crimes. Out buying food for their night of "sneaking," Martin thus goes into hiding and makes a new name for himself in the years following. We catch up with him in 1992, where has changed his name to Martin Bishop (Robert Redford) and where he has embarked on a fruitful career as a security specialist. Hired by major companies to protect their software from potential hackers, he, along with a team of technological experts, make bank keeping firewalls firm and codes strong. Few know of his past encounter with the law - so imagine his surprise when two agents (Timothy Busfield and Eddie Jones) arrive in his office with an offer that he won't much be inclined to refuse. Well aware of former identity, they provide him with a quasi-threatening ultimatum. If he and his team steal a "black box" from Dr. Gunter Janek (Donal Logue), a Russian scientist, they will clear his name and enable him to live life without fear of having his past catch up with him. Do the opposite and he'll be arrested, his new existence completely thrown away. Persuaded that the box, said to be a sort of weapon to be utilized by the Russian government, will cause more harm than good, he reluctantly agrees, his colleagues following close behind. But as in all good and decent caper films, there is more than what meets the eye - and this black box is much more of a threat than what was originally thought possible. Most of the time, I'm fond of films like "Sneakers," which are thrilling but also witty, fitted with impressive casts that are brought down to Earth as affable anti-heroes. The movie is made in the same tradition as other capers, "The Thomas Crown Affair" and "The Italian Job" coming to mind, but it doesn't always match their slickness; it's supposed to be fizzy, even fulgent, entertainment, but it is too reliant on star power and electronic cred when it should be more intent on directorial crispness, a snappy screenplay. But "Sneakers" lies there rather limply, with so much focus on Redford, who is in fine form here, that the big name cast seems to stick around simply to fulfill character types, none standing as three-dimensional supporters. Aside from Ben Kingsley, who turns up (with a cringeworthy American accent) in a nicely villainous role, there is no reason for the film's ensemble to be comprised of household names. Box-office attraction is all the rage, I guess. There are some decently wicked lines here and there, and some of the cardboard cutouts of supplemental characters do get a chance to break out of their confines and do deliver what we'd hope they might; Mary McDonnell is sexy and clever as Redford's ex-girlfriend turned partner-in-crime, and David Strathairn is becomingly deadpan as a blind conglomerate. But "Sneakers" is an otherwise dated thriller vulnerable to losing its charm as the computer age thickens and as its stars slowly descend into the pitfalls that peck at heavyweights of the past.
John A (ca) wrote: A pleasant viewing experience, and a kind of precursor to silly fight movies like Bloodsport. However, Kurosawa stays away from the egregious errors of Van Damme movies and instead allows his narrative and central character to develop quietly. There are also several excellent compositions, including the opening tracking shot. However, at times the narrative seems a bit nonsensical, particularly with the villain and his motivation.
Guillaume B (us) wrote: Isabelle Blais: la Scarlett Johansson quebecoise
Patrick S (ag) wrote: Good action. Gotta love Snipes taking out the bad dudes!
ernest e (mx) wrote: Made for TV film good enough but not fantastic. Another great example of how British culture is so sexually repressed and confused while living in such a beautiful countryside. Only UK says Picasso is messed up while they are more messed up themselves.
Gary S (it) wrote: Hammer House's first foray into the Quatermass universe. Actually still quite an eerie, chilling film. These days it is a fairly common event sending people into space. Back then it had not been done and outer space (even fairly close to Earth) was very much the great unknown.
Andrew G (es) wrote: A Texas Chainsaw Massacre knockoff, and a damn good one at that. Well-paced, adequately-acted, and quite disturbing in parts. Certainly worth a watch by horror fans.
Ashley A (us) wrote: Really love these two together. love this movie it is one of my favourites.