A Bloody Aria

A Bloody Aria

On a day trip through the countryside, aspiring opera singer In-jeong flees to the woods to escape the advances of her lecherous professor and mentor, Yeong-sun. When a seemingly harmless local man offers her a ride to the bus station, In-jeong thinks she's been saved - until he insists that they stop to meet his friends, a disturbed group of country-bred thugs. In-jeong finds herself reunited with Yeong-sun and it slowly becomes clear that the pair is being held captive to participate in the gang's sadistic mind games. This film examines the power struggles that exist even at the lowest rung of society.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:115 minutes
  • Release:2006
  • Language:Korean
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:student,   professor,   blood,  

On a day trip through the countryside, aspiring opera singer In-jeong flees to the woods to escape the advances of her lecherous professor and mentor, Yeong-sun. When a seemingly harmless ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


A Bloody Aria torrent reviews

David N (ru) wrote: Magnifique film sur l'histoire de Jappeloup, amateur de chevaux je vous le conseille.

David Ray G (es) wrote: This movie felt like a deja vu. I personally felt as though I've seen it before, but the fact is, when it comes to movies like this one, you've never seen enough of them - movies portraying the injustice brought upon black people by white people. It was well made, resonant, with strong performances. I felt moved and angry and it was powerful overall. Not as strong as it could have been, and not as unique, but it got its point across, and ultimately, maybe that was the goal. Would have preferred it to have been shorter, and more to-the-point.

Shaun S (us) wrote: Three generations of dreams.

Cody D (fr) wrote: Metafilmic, quirky, political, and simply genius.

Dave S (de) wrote: A solid followup even if you can see the outcome a mile away. The script is believable and the characters are still lovable. Not five stars like the original but not far behind.

Trevor D (nl) wrote: The first 45 minutes is both admirable in its building of suspense before the return of the titular villain, yet simultaneously dull as we follow four bland (and fairly stupid) characters towards their inevitable end. Sangster's script has some nice moments of wit, and his decision to keep Dracula entirely silent is a bold and interesting one (if not entirely successful). Fisher wrings out some memorable sequences, particularly the shockingly gruesome and tense resurrection ceremony, but overall "Dracula: Prince of Darkness" is a fairly rote, loose sequel that simply tics all of the standard Hammer tropes without bringing anything new to the table.

Augustine H (jp) wrote: Despite a slow start, this highly Marxist drama reflects the destitute of the proletariat and sarcasm over Mussolini's regime vividly and vigorously. A true masterpiece for both the Neorealist cinema and Communist studies.

Kyle E (kr) wrote: No this isn't a National Lampoon movie although you could easily be fooled into thinking that with this title. As you might have expected this is a Christmas set film and its about a naughty Santa character. Again you could easily be fooled into thinking this is a silly kids movie with lots of fart gags...but no, its actually a black comedy and most definitely for the grown ups. The whole point of this film is the ever so slight redemption of the main character played by Thornton. This guy is a low down permanently drunk criminal who drags his way through life whilst robbing department stores with his dwarf partner. The dubious duo take yearly jobs as a department store Santa and his elf worker, this way they get to know the ins and outs of the store so they can easily rob it. Things change for Thornton's character 'Stokes' when he meets a tubby little boy who he kinda befriends and takes a shine to...eventually. This film is kinda unique in the sense that the main character has many flaws and issues which you tend to think he will sort out at some point by the end of the film. The twist and funny part is he doesn't really change at all, he does a little bit with the help of his little fat young friend, but not too much really, he still ends up as the same bum. The amusing things about the film are the constant little moments where Thornton's character gets angry or frustrated with the fat kid and swears at him. The little fat kid (eerily played by Kelly) seems to be a bit slow and just takes the abuse, in one ear and out the other. At times it can be very funny to watch these outbursts yet at other times you do feel sorry for the kid or Stokes because you know he sometimes doesn't mean it. The heist aspect of the film is quite good and offers some reasonably tense moments, especially near the end. The various Santa sequences are probably the films highlights as we see Thornton getting sneezed and coughed on by lots of pant wetting scroats. Of course his reactions and the way he treats the kids are the best bits, he basically sneers growls and scowls at them, finally nudging them off his knee and virtually kicking them to the curb. Watching the reactions of the parents is great, as a man pushing 40 and with no kids I love it, if I was a parent I might feel differently I guess who knows. The darkest sequence must be when a severely pissed Stokes crawls up the escalator towards his Santa grotto. His beard and clothes now filthy stained and damaged, he looks like shit, can hardly walk and promptly falls into a reindeer display. This whole sequence starts out funny but descends into a more cringeworthy incident as he freaks out and starts to smash up the Xmas display in front of everyone in the store, its still amusing but also poignant and depressing...much like the plot as a whole really. The finale was a tad of a let down for me, it does seem like you're gonna get the predictable ending where Stokes will die trying to achieve a small slice of decency in his life, the right ending. A bit like the finale in 'The Wrestler' where Rourke's character goes out doing what he loves but also reclaiming a small part of his dignity right at the end. Even though this ending is predictable as I said, I think it would have been stronger for obvious reasons. Instead Stokes lives on and we get some mumbo jumbo about how he survived and what he plans to do after he heals up. This simply feels like an open ending so they can roll out a sequel which this film really doesn't need in my opinion, if it happens that is. I think it should have wrapped up there and then. All in all I like how this is basically an anti-Christmas flick which sticks two fingers up at the sweet yuletide greetings side of it and embraces the Scrooge side with extreme profanity. Its not exactly original in idea, the drunk rude Santa schtick has been done before but you can't deny its amusing. Crude rude edgy and drenched in cynicism...but there is a soft warm heart buried deep in there and it just about manages to shine through in the end.

Jeremiah L (br) wrote: A gory movie with no suspense and all the clichs.

Eric B (kr) wrote: Simple but gritty; tightly constructed.