A Life Less Ordinary

A Life Less Ordinary

A couple of angels, O'Reilly and Jackson, are sent to Earth to make sure that their next supervised love-connection succeeds. They follow Celine, a spoiled rich girl who has just accidentally shot a suitor and, due to a misunderstanding, is kidnapped by janitor Robert. Although Celine quickly frees herself, she stays with Robert for thrills. O'Reilly and Jackson pursue, hoping to unite the prospective lovers.

The film revolves around a cleaning man in L.A. who takes his boss's daughter hostage after being fired and replaced by a robot. Two angels who are tasked to human relationships on earth, offer some unsolicited help to bring this unlikely couple together. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

A Life Less Ordinary torrent reviews

adam o (mx) wrote: its so so so so funny stuff for kids

Christine D (de) wrote: It was ok. Not at all what I had expected.

Rocky S (de) wrote: This movie was surprisingly good - the comedic elements well thought out and better yet well-timed. Sharon Cuneta is absolutely hilarious.

Robert H (kr) wrote: I don't have a problem with a sequel to Peter Pan. Peter Pan is classic fantasy storytelling. I don't mind that essentially this film uses all the same characters except it substitutes a giant octopus for the shark. I even kinda like the WWII aspects of the film. But Peter Pan 2 is essentially just the same as Peter Pan! The story is roughly the same. There is very little variation going on here. Apparently the only story you can tell using Peter Pan is of believing and imagination and having fun. God forbid you use the setting and characters to tell a different story.*sigh* This is lazy storytelling at best and if it weren't for the beautiful colours, fun fancy free flying ways of Peter Pan, the always good message, and the fantastical elements, I'd likely hate this film. As such, I'm luke warm on it at best.

Arum Padma O (kr) wrote: Boring. No emotions whatsoever

Matt H (fr) wrote: Strange film. Not sure what it's trying to say, other than that kids can be stupid sometimes.

Dustin G (mx) wrote: Not bad. Has its moments. Feels a little long, even at under an hour and a half, which is never a good sign. The comedy is similar to that of Sleeper, in that you'll either find it funny, or you won't. I didn't for the most part.

Allan C (es) wrote: A waitress decides to become a professional wrestler. Yep, it's as dumb as it sounds, but it's quite entertaining on an ironic level.

Zoran S (fr) wrote: It's not the greatest Sirk but it's solidly composed and filmed.

Ethan P (mx) wrote: Sam Shepard is decent, the scenery and cinematography are excellent and the setting is right, but the story is a little ridiculous and it has no pulse or excitement. The supporting actors aren't very good and the movie needs more energy.

Grayson W (kr) wrote: Kind of fun, but ultimately cheesy teen horror movie with strong 90s vibe.

Harry W (kr) wrote: I'll cut to the chase: Johnny Mnemonic is not a good film, but viewed in the right frame of mind it's not a boring one either. It's a lot like Tank Girl.It's ambitions were good with some half decent plot exploration and it's done fairly well for a sic fi action on it's budget, but it's ultimately undone by it's crummy screenplay, confusing direction and terrible acting, most notably a hollow Keanu Reeves and a job by Dolph Lundgren that made no f*cking sense whatsoever. Plus, the action wasn't special and there wasn't enough of it.I got more interested in the film towards the end, so it's definitely something that you can sit through, but at times theres poor lighting and not enough sic-fi exploration, so it makes you wonder why. It's more like an MTV music video at some times

Brandon W (gb) wrote: This is purely the most hilarious and outrageous movie in almost forever. The extreme under expression was perfect for the tone of the movie! I laughed until it hurt! I would watch this hundreds of times again and it will never get old!