An Adventure in Space and Time

An Adventure in Space and Time

This special one-off drama travels back in time to 1963 to see how Doctor Who was first brought to the screen. Actor William Hartnell felt trapped by a succession of hard-man roles. Wannabe producer Verity Lambert was frustrated by the TV industry's glass ceiling. Both of them were to find unlikely hope and unexpected challenges in the form of a Saturday tea-time drama. Allied with a team of unusual but brilliant people, they went on to create the longest running science fiction series ever made.

An alien Time Lord has a chance to explore the wonderful space in a Police Box spaceship.The episode of Doctor Who was broadcast made a television legend in 1963. Fifty years later, this film is produced to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the franchise. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


An Adventure in Space and Time torrent reviews

Eric F (ca) wrote: Boring, lazy, forgettable, and a cash grab for the old timers nostalgia.

Jorge O (gb) wrote: Wow. This movie was awwwesomeee.. It\'s a great film like all Underworld movies, but this one is just great. Action at all times, intense. It\'s just an amazing movie. The sound in that Imax was just amazing. Every little detail sound like you where inside the movie. This film was very well done. I have to say that the 3D was not as good as a expected it to be. The 3D effects are almost none. But the movie is still awesome. Specially in Imax.

Chris B (fr) wrote: Light-hearted, unchallenging, a little silly, but still a delightful way to spend 2 hours

Dennis K (gb) wrote: nice to see franke potente, gong li, and rinko kikuchi, all in one film, but the writing, direction, production design and cinematography are unbelievably hackneyed. One gets the idea that the director had his hands tied, and more than likely didn't have final cut.

Sean G (de) wrote: Nick Stahl AND Gavin Rosedale? Was Channing Tatum not available as well?

Tamsin P (us) wrote: Luckily, it's not the tail to the chief one.

Jessica R (mx) wrote: Too slow. Ignorance is bliss for me. I really didn't want to see the killing floor.

Johnny T (fr) wrote: With its cheap scares, its defiant lack of special effects, and the most blatant usage of a red coat as a stand-out prop since Schindler's List, Godsend is as much an experiment-gone-wrong as its Frankensteinesque plot. De Niro wears a shamefaced look most of the time, as if doubly embarrassed: He agreed to a movie he knew was worthless, yet he's too lazy or indifferent to give us his best. This thin concoction of domestic drama and thriller suspense won't hold up after the curiosity factor runs its brief course. Neither Robert De Niro nor a phalanx of a dozen producers can deliver Godsend from unintentional comedy. Kinnear and Romijn-Stamos appear to be vying for the title of filmdom's least-convincing married couple, while Robert De Niro, as the movie's modern-day Dr. Frankenstein, takes his own expert career slumming to a new depth -- he's become an evil clone of a once-great actor. VERDICT: "Not So Hot" - [Negative Reaction] These films are truly terrible films. They are not the worst things ever made, but they are definitely awful and should not be seen by anyone. (Films that are rated 1.5 or 2 stars)

Lisa Michelle A (br) wrote: I think you will only love this film if your a fan of Dolph Lundgren, and luckily for me i am!!! I don't like every film he's ever made, just a select few, with Silent Trigger being my ultimate favorite of his. I have loved this ever since i first saw it, about 6 years ago now. The first time i saw it i didn't catch if from the beginning, i caught it from about 15mins in. The second time it was on i watched it from the beginning, and now own the DVD. I love this film because it has action, suspense, thrills, gun fights and a great storyline. Gina Bellman is a great partner for Dolph, and it was so different seeing her in a film like this, as i'm so used to her being in Coupling! So it was a refreshing change to see her sink her acting talents into something as great as Silent Trigger is! But like i said, unless your a fan of Dolph Lundgren then it probably won't be to everyone's taste. But i still recommend it to everyone. It has an R rating, which to me is an 18, so it could be too violent for most people to truly appreciate how great a film it really is, but still give it a try, as you never know, you could love it as much as me!!!

Alden S (kr) wrote: 9.5 out of 10:The story is about nothing but it still manages to be funny, entertaining, and relatable.

Sterlin R (kr) wrote: I thought the action was okay, and Mel did a fine job, but the movie just wasn't that good.

FilmGrinder S (ag) wrote: Godzilla has a checkerd past, when it comes to his home land of Japan. On a bad day he would prefer to level a building instead of waiting for his sushi and sake like the rest of us. But, on his good days, he protects Japan from foreign and domestic threats alike. Unfortunate for Japan, the sushi wasn't fresh this round. Who will stand up against Godzilla? How about a giant nori roll!

victor l (ag) wrote: Heaven Help Us is a proof HBO didn't start producing the masterpieces it makes currently. This picture is partially involving, so-so interesting but it develops a topic I don't like to see in pictures and this is violence in boarding schools, specially in Catholic Schools; that one was depicted like if it was the Holy Inquisition. The story is tedious most of the times but it's a little fun too in some other scenes. I think Donald Sutherland is miscast here.

IOnell S (de) wrote: Repugnante historia del trfico humano que an sufrimos en este mundo. Rabia da pensar que la gente que se supone confiamos es la que nos traiciona. Rachel como siempre fantstica