Babes in Toyland

Babes in Toyland

11-year-old Lisa has no time for toys; she's too busy taking care of her siblings and cooking for her mother. During the Christmas Eve blizzard, Lisa travels to Toyland in Wizard of Oz-like fashion and arrives just in time for a wedding. Young Mary Contrary is about to marry mean, old Barnaby Barnacle, despite the fact that she loves Jack Be Nimble. Lisa tries to stop this terrible wedding and, together with her new friends, discovers that Barnaby wants to take over Toyland. Lisa, Mary, Jack, and Georgie Porgie ask the Toymaster for help, but he can't help them as long as Lisa doesn't truly believe in toys.

11-year-old Lisa has no time for toys; she's too busy taking care of her siblings and cooking for her mother. During the Christmas Eve blizzard, Lisa travels to Toyland in Wizard of Oz-like... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Babes in Toyland torrent reviews

Waleed A (ca) wrote: amazing movie. awesome story, interesting premise, great action, very funny, and a very deep psychological aspect to it. beastly directing. by far the best "found footage" movie imo. they used it in so many creative ways. and they kept true to it. when a camera was far you couldn't hear the words they were saying, just their voices. or the security footage having no sound. it was so impactful and made it feel real. (3 viewings)SPOILERSi loved the way they expanded on the original premise. how they could eventually fly, and put a forcefield around themselves. i loved how in the beginning they were learning it, practicing, messing with people, etc. i also liked that the nerdy kid that everyone picks on is not the good guy but the villain. it makes you think that after all the psychological damage that he went through, when he finally had the power to do something about it, he used it for revenge, etc instead of good. as a smart uncle once said, with great power comes great responsibility.

Natalia N (fr) wrote: ??????? ??? ??? ??????? ???? ??????. ???????? ?? ??? ?? ?? ???, ?????? ??? ??? ???????? ?????? ??? ????????, ??? ???????? ??? ??????? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???, ????????? ????? ????? ???????.

Stacey O (us) wrote: It should have been better, but you just don't care.

Marco P (gb) wrote: Few Movies-docs show this. It is an important message. The montage is sufficiently good and coherent and connected. Well done! I suggested it and will suggest it to many people who don't know what war is. I suggest to all the people also to see "Hell and back again" it is a must to see.Ciao.

Cassie H (ca) wrote: Enjoyed it alot. Paul Rudd is such a cutie and is very funny and Michelle Pfeiffer is as well

Mark L (fr) wrote: another good graff movies under Bomb the System.. shows the good n bad sides of graffiti

Russell H (mx) wrote: Back when Damon Wayons was funny, this was great. Just ask Cornbread.

Bill C (it) wrote: Insiderish but well paced dark comedy - and as good a tour of Hollywood as you will see in the movies. After twenty-eight years we can forgive the shameless stunt casting; the film has actually aged pretty well. Goldblum and Pfeiffer bring a natural chemistry to the shenanigans. Good fun !

Jon T (mx) wrote: Ralph Bakshi's post-apocalyptic animated fantasy about mutant Nazis setting out to conquer the Earth is a complete mess. It's haphazardly directed, it's poorly written, and it's production values are even worse. The animation looks no better than a cheap Saturday morning cartoon, and gets no better when Bakshi attempts to mesh "rotoscoped" live-action sequences into numerous scenes. As with his disastrous LORD OF THE RINGS, the clashing styles of artistry work against the movie. The only noteworthy parts of the animation are some vibrantly drawn still photos which make up portions of the story (narrated by a totally BORING --and I mean boring with a capital "B"-- female voiceover). Aside from that and a pretty song over the closing credits, WIZARDS is little more than just a mindnumbing, bloody, sleep-inducing travesty with a plot that makes absolutely no sense and characters who are not only ill-defined, but are unappealing in every way. I understand that this movie has a cult following, but I cannot recommend it. Its offensive nature and incongrous "cartoonish" gags make the movie more painful than anything else.

Vaibhav W (kr) wrote: Orson Welles' compelling argument against death penalty is the highlight of this black-n-white classic.

Jo Y (mx) wrote: Glenn is something else.and so is Rita..

Jason M (gb) wrote: I feel bad for Adam Sandler in this movie so I'll give it twice as many stars as it gave me laughs.

James M (gb) wrote: Cheesy low-budget horror nonsense.

Kenneth E (fr) wrote: Happy feet contained the typical ear-marks of a post 2001-era film for all the wrong reasons. Here are the top three things that annoyed me about this film: 1) Soul-less CG characters. The penguins were stiff, identical, but oh, did they look photorealistic! I understand filmmakers were going for a more Discovery-Channel feel, but this decision greatly reduced my emotional connection with all characters. A more logical approach would have been to make the film more akin to the penguins on Madagascar, which were bursting with expression. Also, major points deducted for cheating, as studio Animal Logic went the cheap route by incorporating live action human footage in Act III instead of attempting to create realistic CG people. 2) A complete mockery of music; the soundtrack was a glorified karaoke party, with much of the songs reminding me more of LA than the arctic wilderness. The only exception would be the amazing group sequence towards the end as Mumble got all the penguins to dance as one unified community. This sequence was amazing. 3) The inevitable inclusion of at least two Lord of the Rings actors for insurance reasons. I hate when so many movies do this.Besides these three aspects, I also disliked this film because of its unnecessarily intense chase scenes involving killer orcas and seals; my gut feeling is that such scenes were included primarily to compete with the shark sequence in Finding Nemo. They certainly didn't help propel the story to new heights. Also, the film had one huge plot hole which was that dancing was forbidden but singing was not. (Huh??)The simple act of Mumble moving his feet for his own self-enjoyment was seen as a moral sin by the community, and yet penguins could sing their lungs out to Elvis Presley? Is that really more sensible? Things get even more ridiculous once the penguins dive into the water; there, they loop, twirl, swirl.. yes, this is also known as DANCING. On the positive side, this film had some wonderful and funny vocal performances by the late Robin Williams, including his character "Lovelace," which was my favorite character in the movie. Also, Mumble's journey was fairly epic during the last third of the film, as the little guy set out on a quest to discover the truth about the "aliens." The result to this journey was a deep environmental truth involving overfishing, pollution, animal captivity, and human inabilities to act for the greater good despite being the planet's dominant species. Such a daring conclusion was welcoming, and rarely done in this slapstick era dominated by Shrek and Scrat. For this simple reason, Happy Feet may have brought home the Oscar for Best Animation in 2007.

Alyssa K (gb) wrote: This film could of been more successful on TV in May of 1989 on NBC on the last Sunday. It should of been titled" Star Trek 5: The Planet Dilemma" and the plot is Kirk has a Earth humanoid wife name Julie Lynn Marshall played by Beverly Leech becomes a victim of a influenza-like virus. Sulu and Chekov become victims of the virus. Kirk needs to make the hardest decision ever in his life to use the antitoxin on. The virus is cured and the planet of Altair 6 is safe from chaos from the victims of the virus on the planet. The movie is high rated and a hit with everybody.

Sheila C (ag) wrote: Flawed epic set in the 16th Century