Barndommens gade

Barndommens gade

I en lille 2-værelses baggårdslejlighed, på Vesterbro i København, bor den 14 årige Ester (Sofie Gråbøl) sammen med faderen (Torben Jensen), moderen (Vigga Bro) og storebroderen Carl (Carl Quist Møller). Det er tidens typiske arbejderkvarter og lejligheden er uden nogen form for moderne bekvemmeligheder. Koks skal hentes i en mørk kælder, hvor hjemløse har søgt ly og logi for natten. Ester er en drømmer. Hendes ønske er at blive forfatter og hun skriver digte i det skjulte. Hun glemmer ofte tid og sted, når hendes tanker går på langfart.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:90 minutes
  • Release:1986
  • Language:Danish
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:based on novel,  

I en lille 2-værelses baggårdslejlighed, på Vesterbro i København, bor den 14 årige Ester (Sofie Gråbøl) sammen med faderen (Torben Jensen), moderen (Vigga Bro) og storebroderen Carl (Carl Quist Møller). Det er tidens typiske arbejderkvarter og lejligheden er uden nogen form for moderne bekvemmeligheder. Koks skal hentes i en mørk kælder, hvor hjemløse har søgt ly og logi for natten. Ester er en drømmer. Hendes ønske er at blive forfatter og hun skriver digte i det skjulte. Hun glemmer ofte tid og sted, når hendes tanker går på langfart. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Barndommens gade torrent reviews

Daniel P (br) wrote: Significantly better than a direct-to-video WWE produced horror sequel has any right to be, with an innovative 'final girl', a good music score and some decent cinematography. It's still trash though, and given the directorial talent and actors involved (Danielle Harris *and* Katharine Isabelle) I was still disappointed.

Andy W (ag) wrote: In Another Country plays with its narrative by adding different twists to each segment of the story. It is a pleasant, albeit lightweight, rumination on the crossroads of life that lead to different paths, and the film cleverly leaves everything up for audience's interpretations (and reconstruction as well). Huppert's naturalistic performances are playful and full of charm, and Sang-soo Hong's assured direction (love his constant zoom-ins) helps set the mood to a breezy tone. The film may not evoke the strongest of emotions, but it serves as an interesting cinematic experiment and a somewhat thought-provoking journey.

Noname (ru) wrote: Boogeyman are back once again. A low budget horror flick with decent acting and story. Perhaps better than the 2nd one but the first are still on top. Not the best horror flicks out there but they are watchable..

Mohammed A (au) wrote: It's good movie to watch

Roshan P (nl) wrote: Not really sure what I just watched.

Justin K (ru) wrote: Not as well made as AMERICAN WAREWOLF IN LONDON for the humor and horror didn't mix well, the climax was anti-clamatic, and at times the movie just seemed silly. However the gore by Tom Savini (nice cameo by him) was as always spot on, and the story and actors were great and death by sunlight for a vampire was pretty creepy. But, this is just one of those movies where not everything mixed well in the end. But I do have to admit it is entertaining.

Jay B (gb) wrote: Three great actors... one lame movie. I couldn't wait for this bore to end.

pave m (nl) wrote: just when i think iv run out of andrew mccarthy movies from the 80s ...another one turns up :)

Joseph P (br) wrote: bad news bears of stock car racing!! just doesn't work at all!! 1/4!! highly forgettable!!

Eric B (nl) wrote: A modest little film noir about a sailor falling for a sideshow mermaid who may or may not be the real item. It's easy to have affection for "Night Tide" (which achieves quite a bit with obviously limited resources) but, unfortunately, it has a humdrum ending which wrecks all the preceding story's accumulated spookiness. It also does an annoyingly poor job of tying up one loose end (an older woman who mysteriously stalks the mermaid girl).Even at just 84 minutes, this simple tale seems longer than it needs to be, but any story about a decrepit, seaside carnival is bound to have plenty of atmosphere. And the secondary characters aren't just placeholders, but add some engaging quirks of their own.Most people who seek out this film will be motivated by seeing Dennis Hopper in an early role, but his performance is rather indistinct and just repeats the same note of vague, restrained confusion. No flashy anger, and little of his usual intensity. If the lead had been a forgotten actor with talent, the film would be no worse.

Jarrod R (nl) wrote: Inspiring, intriguing....3 Jean Claude van Dammes

Serge L (au) wrote: Didn't find this funny at all. Just gross and ridiculous in a strange way not funny way. Blech!

Donna B (mx) wrote: How could you not like a movie set in the 90's? It's funny and def worth watching at least once. Not to mention there are a lotof great actors. I was very happy to see Donald Glover plays a part in this movie.

Rangan R (nl) wrote: Expected a very little, but delivered very hugely.The first word I said after the watch was 'unbelievable'. That means the movie is not bad, but how come I missed it for this long. This is the best dark-fantasy movie I have seen recently. But earlier, I thought it would be like the movie 'Tusk' which made me a little uncomfortable to watch. So in the end, what's the difference between the tusk and/or the horn. Both come in a pair and animals have it to defend themselves from the threat. When I watched that movie, I lost interest in this. Yep, it is a silly reason and now I feel bad for that.This movie dominated by the British cast, especially for having Daniel Radcliffe and Juno Temple I thought it was British film, actually it was not. It was a Canadian-US jointly produced, adapted from a book of the same name and directed by 'Mirror' director. The story was so good, not genuine, though explored the theme very well. For every few minutes later, the narration was taking a turn and that made the plot to get lot tighter before heading for the concluding part.Maybe this the best movie of Radcliffe that I've seen after his goodbye to 'Harry Potter' movie series. I don't think he's a chocolate boy type, but this kind of movie suits him well. I think he should get muscles for more movie like this, but his height is another negative factor. The film was entirely shot in Canada, the photography was great, music as well as performances. Even those settings like woods, tree house feels kind of wet English and Scottish atmosphere that fits for a devilish mythical charactered movie like this. I regret for reviewing it so delayedly, but anyway I did it and over it, so I hope you watch it very soon as well if you haven't seen it yet.7/10