Before You Say 'I Do'
George Murray's fiancée Jane Gardner gets cold feet after accepting his ring, terrorized by her first wedding with Doug, who cheated that very day with their wedding coordinator. After a car crash, George finds himself 10 years in the past, just days before Doug's day.
- Stars:David Sutcliffe, Jennifer Westfeldt, Lauren Holly, Brad Borbridge, Jeff Roop, John Boylan, Brandon Firla, Roger Dunn, Salvatore Antonio, Reagan Pasternak, Jamie Bloch, London Angelis, Arlene Mazerolle, Lorry Ayers, Martin Roach,
- Director:Paul Fox,
- Writer:Elena Krupp
George Murray's fiancée Jane Gardner gets cold feet after accepting his ring, terrorized by her first wedding with Doug, who cheated that very day with their wedding coordinator. After a ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Before You Say 'I Do' torrent reviews
(kr) wrote: the movie is awful but the thing from making it completely awful is the action scenes
(ag) wrote: A group of people -- nine to be exact -- are trapped in a house. They are given instructions over an intercom, basically telling them that the last one who lives will receive five million dollars. From there on out, the house gets dangerous: will we see the best or the worst of human nature? One could describe this movie as "Saw 2" meets "House on Haunted Hill", though that wouldn't really do this film justice. Others have compared it to "Battle Royale". Simply put, while the themes may overlap, this film is still unique in many ways. Which isn't always easy after a century of plots being used up. Dennis Hopper has a fairly large role, but mysteriously he appears as a priest. Also, he talks slow and awkward like he can't remember his lines. I didn't really think this captured his ability very well. As another reviewer said, "Dennis Hopper is ineffective as a priest. If you're going to have Hopper in your movie; make the most of it, don't give him a role like this." There seemed to be little concern among the housemates that the food was poisoned. Or the booze. It is mentioned once, but I believe this is after they've already been eating and drinking. The film has a weird soundtrack, which seems out of place (too pop rock for a horror film), and there's a strange hip-hop dance scene. I don't know what is up with that. But the film as a whole is good, and I have to say it has a great ending. I can't say what it is, of course, but if the film does not impress you, wait until the end because I think it really redeems itself of any flaws.
(gb) wrote: Extremely gorgeous film. The shots of the california landscape are breathtaking. What a journey, with themes of love, sex, nihilism, and machoism, Dumont takes you on a hypnotic journey. The ending is something else. Loved it.
(kr) wrote: Even worse than the first one, this overly gross piece of crap is definitely the most unwatchable of the series.
(ag) wrote: Still a decent movie.
(jp) wrote: Kiefer Sutherland is so fucking HOT! in this movie! I love the clothes he wears, his attitude, and him!
(mx) wrote: Bueno me rei bastante d lo basura q es... Por eso le di 2 estrellas...
(ag) wrote: Absolutely gripping story of a phony medium who billies her husband into kidnapping a child so she can get a reward for use her psychic powers to help the police "find" the child. Brilliantly acted by Attenborough, as a put upon husband, and Stanley, as the mentally ill phony psychic. The film is also smartly directed by Brian Forbes, who adapted the novel for film as well. I loved how the film had an edge to it, with story elements I would never see Hollywood having the guts to do today, which really made this film feel quite unique. All around a great film!
(br) wrote: Amazing story to go along with action, adventure, hero's, villains, and dragons. Great plot and an exciting twist has you captivated through the whole movie.
(ca) wrote: Mielenkiintoisesta alkukohdista saatiin aikaiseksi melko perinteinen slasher -tyylinen kauhuilu, 2 1/2p
(jp) wrote: Wonderful cgi and music
(jp) wrote: John Woo is an awful director he ruins movies