A young man is released from an asylum and returns home for revenge on his aunt and her three daughters, who had him declared insane in order to steal his inheritance. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Bell from Hell
A young man is released from an asylum and returns home for revenge on his aunt and her three daughters, who had him declared insane in order to steal his inheritance.
You may also like
Bell from Hell torrent reviews
Sherry J (nl) wrote: Good Cartoon loved it! I'm a die hard Top Cat Fan. It was excellent.
Laura A (au) wrote: Atrocious film, absolutely atrocious. The only thing funny about this film is that the same chavs it's dedicated to mocking find it hilarious and subsequently made it a mild success. The only people who would find it funny are those who like stupid, over exaggerated 'humour' and most likely below the age of 16. Absolutely no effort went into it and therefore I'm making no effort to dress up the fact that it's terrible. If you're ridiculously childish, watch it. If you're not, don't waste your time.
Madeline M (mx) wrote: This documentary is brief, but Bill Withers is so likable and thoughtful and, of course, an amazing artist. I'm really glad I watched it.
Landon V (au) wrote: not as good as Armageddon deep impact brings tidal waves metors and E.L.E in this film its basically like Armageddon with Robert Duvall I think 2 or 3 main characters died and with the president more Afton it does a good example of a late 1990s or early 2000s but I got a feeling it looks like a early 1990s and lates 80s don't expect any huge destruction scenes mostly just SPOILER SPOILER like 2 mega destruction scenes witch is still fine 3 1/2 stars 77%
Michael H (ru) wrote: Very mediocre 70s exploitation film. All it has to recommend it are few good gore effects and Sherry Buchanan as the lovely canvas the cannibals paint flowers on.
Aj V (ag) wrote: This is such a disappointing movie! It's got a fantastic cast, but it wastes them on a cliched, predictable, old story with nothing new to offer. I will say that it has some good moments, but overall it's a let down, especially the end.
Fran P (nl) wrote: It's entertaining enough. It's no "Mortal Kombat" when it comes to its tone (in fact, it's surprisingly fluffy), but definitely not as bad as critics made it out to be. I think the reason why I kind of enjoyed this film is that my expectations were really low. I mainly wanted to see characters fight for the hell of it (profound reasons or otherwise) and I got just that. This movie could've been better if there were gore, a more menacing villain, and a darker tone. It's too tongue-and-cheek for its own good and I must admit that I did roll my eyes more than five times throughout the whole film because some characters are too cartoony. Still, it's an enjoyable piece of junk. If you're remotely interested in watching it, I won't stop you.
Ryan H (br) wrote: Mixing a little good with a whole lot of bad, Jason X is actually a tiny bit underrated. It fails as a horror movie due to its lack of scares, it almost succeeds as a slasher flick thanks to its gory and brutal kills, and it actually somewhat succeeds as a sci-fi movie. There's actually a surprising amount of unintentional humor, making Jason X almost not quite passable.
Simon M (de) wrote: Dude this isn't a movie from 2004, it's from 1985. And it's a cheap piece o sh*t.