Gena is a sweet and dedicated mother to her little son. One day, whilst shopping with him for a halloween mask, her son is accidently shot through the chest by a Japanese Gunman, trying to kill an opposing gang of bus operators. Gena notices that the gunman has a picture of a blue tiger on his chest. She is turned into an obsessed person and has an identical red tiger etched into her skin. She then tracks down the killer and plots his death. This leads her into the world of the Japanese Mafia
- Stars:Virginia Madsen, Tôru Nakamura, Dean Hallo, Ryo Ishibashi, Sal Lopez, Yuji Okumoto, Harry Dean Stanton, Brenda Varda, François Chau, Henry Mortensen, Claudia Templeton, Toshishiro Obata, John Hammil, Chris DeRose, Thomas 'Doc' Boguski,
- Country:USA, Japan
- Director:Norberto Barba,
- Writer:Takashige Ichise (story), Joel Soisson (screenplay)
A woman dedicates her life to seeking revenge after her son is killed by crossfire as Japanese gangsters perform a hit. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Blue Tiger torrent reviews
(it) wrote: This movie was a childhood delight for me. I also loved The Real Ghostbusters Cartoon which it spawned.
(ru) wrote: It can be difficult to translate the experience of watching a play to traditional film. The strength of the story is tested when it changes mediums. In the case of "Hyde Park on Hudson," it may have been a benefit that I knew it had been a play first, even though I had not seen the play. I watched it as a play, so it wasn't as poorly received by me as it appears to have been by others. Maybe it is my generation, but seeing Bill Murray continue to take on roles like this does my heart good. While I can't say he did an admirable job of portraying a president I've never seen in social situations, he definitely holds his own in the company of veteran Laura Linney. The history of the story of "Daisy" and her special relationship with FDR has been challenged, so knowing how valid the story is becomes important if the reason for watching is to understand history. However, the historical components that include the King and Queen of England are known and add to perceived authenticity of the overall story. Also, given Daisy's length of service with the FDR library and museum years after FDR's death, one can make an assumption that a good portion is probably true. However, the blunt nature in which their relationship begins makes the viewer have to adjust rather suddenly in ascertaining exactly what the point of the movie is, which I'm sure is the reason for many viewers being turned off by the film. Once past that early scene, though, I was able to appreciate the story for what it was. Yes, it could have gone a more traditional route and helped establish more depth around just who Daisy was, but again, this was a play. Characters just don't often get constructed that way. There is little time to do them justice and to have done that for the film may have been perceived as tarnishing the source material. While it isn't a bad film, one has to question why it was deemed worthy of translating to film. It didn't accomplish enough or have the historical strength required to be a story worthy of the big screen.
(fr) wrote: the 2 leads carry this pic
(ca) wrote: Title had potential, but it seems like the same amount of effort was not put into the rest of the movie.
(es) wrote: It is easy enough to look past the poor lighting, cinematography, and editing; it is a low budget film I get that. What you cant look past is how shallow and one deminosal the characters are,
(us) wrote: Admittedly, this film will offend the sensibilities of many an American movie goer. However, Isabelle Huppert an actress without a rival. As I am often wont to say, she is Meryl Streep on steroids.
(de) wrote: Feeling nostalgic for the Manchester music scene? Check out this flick!
(ru) wrote: B movie...but it's pretty good
(mx) wrote: Dreyfuss and Devito are wonderful as is the entire supporting cast and Levinson's dialogue of the 1960's common working man is nothing but poetic. However overall story unfortunately peaks way too early and film bottoms out with a very unsatisfying ending.
(nl) wrote: holds up really well
(mx) wrote: Probably wouldn't have been so disappointed if I hadn't loved the book so much
(jp) wrote: Can't believe I spent money on it :(