A Manhattan call girl (Elizabeth Taylor) has a tragic affair with a rich married man (Laurence Harvey). However, her desire for respectability causes her to reconsider her lifestyle. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
The story about Gloria Wandrous, a promiscuous fashion model, who falls in love with Weston Liggett, the hard drinking son of a working class family who has married into money.
You may also like
BUtterfield 8 torrent reviews
Jun K (fr) wrote: shame... so shame that such outrageous social injustice still happens in kor, and this film had to be made to call attention once more to make up for pathetic n corrupted decision made by kor judicial system. In my opinion, should kill those convicts, who raped and tortured all of those handicapped children, and also punish those who helped and covered their crimes, including fu*kin corrupted gov. officials.
Charlotte B (ru) wrote: This film is brilliant and silly I loved it
Lee W (au) wrote: good film, brutal fight sequences...
Angelica R (fr) wrote: i love this movie so much
James H (es) wrote: The acting ranges from awful to adequate, the production is clearly low budget, needlessly gory and very fake at that. It's just stupid.
Jona S (ru) wrote: The only good and cute thing Disney made.
Del H (es) wrote: A well-acted and well-made thriller that does well in showing the twisted workings of a small pre- Civil Rights Southern town.
Karsh D (mx) wrote: To be fair, it's not good enough for the cult following it has. Still, David Warner has a few good lines so not all bad
Mr N (ru) wrote: Man on Fire is thrilling, dark, well acted and the ending will bring out some tears. Denzel Washington is of course on his A-Game as well as Dakota Fanning pulling off a great child performance. Man on Fire is criminally underrated but it doesn't mean its without flaws of course. The flaws I can think of are the fact that it is kind of cliche and some parts of it is a little over the top, but other than that Man on Fire is a very solid crime thriller! Is it perfect? No. But for what it was going for the late Tony Scott did a great job.
Nicholas A (us) wrote: It has a very unique premise that builds to sheer comedic pandemonium but it failed to create any empathy with any of the characters (unlike Bleasedale's other work). Great performances all round but it just generally seemed lacking.
RiP M (ag) wrote: Incredibly, despite amazing cast, this is more fartsy than artsy. Well-suited to the stage but cinematically lifeless.
Garwin S (us) wrote: Jules Dassin - the French Orson Welles and the forerunner to Jean-Pierre Melville. A timeless classic this one.
Christopher E (br) wrote: Cute and relatable, "500 Days of Summer" is yet another solid romantic comedy where Joseph Gordon-Levitt can shine. Tom Hansen, a greeting card writer, falls in love with the secretary of his new boss. However, when it's stated that she doesn't believe in love, nor does she want a serious relationship, he accepts in hope that he can make something more of it. I knew little, if anything about this movie going into it, but I was excited to watch it. I picked it up on Blu-Ray at my local DVD store for a few bucks and I was finally excited that I had the chance to watch it. To my surprise, it actually turned out to be pretty good. Granted, it doesn't feel like anything new or original, and nothing here is going to blow your mind, but it's a very cute and honest romance that will be able to hit home for more than a few people.First and foremost, I am a fan of Joseph Gordon-Levitt and I've liked Zooey Deschanel in the few things I've seen her in. Individually, they each fill their roles real nicely and Levitt has always been a great, comedic/dramatic actor, but together, they create this very charming and pleasant atmosphere that I'd like to see more of. They work really well together and they build off of each other pretty well. They bring out the personality of the characters and they're able to help relay this great and real message about love.I feel like the best words to describe the script was cute and realistic. For starters, whenever I say a romantic movie's screenplay is cute, that's a really good thing for me. When I'm able to giggle and relate to the things that the characters themselves are doing, it just helps bring this new experience that I only get to experience every so often in real life. When I say realistic, that means that this movie is completely honest about how our minds work when it comes to different scenarios of love. In the end, all of us just want to love and when we think we've found love, we'll do what we can to pursue it. Even though it's obvious that this is probably not the path that Tom should take, considering he's blatantly told that, it shows how clouded our minds can get and how love can easily take over the human brain. I really like the message this movie portrayed about love and how difficult it can be sometimes.Although I understand why they did it, I'm not sure I liked the format of this movie. They were constantly jumping back and forth from day 1, to day 494, back to day 23, then to day 254, and it just got really confusing at a point. It felt like they were jumping from timeline to timeline just for a few comedic moments and it felt a little bit messy. I also felt the narration was unnecessary. We didn't need the narration to help guide us through, especially since neither of the characters were doing it. I felt like it could've been more meaningful if Tom was narrating the story, but instead, it was some random guy doing it. It felt out of place and awkward at times to the point where it just got annoying.The resolution of the story was also out of left field. I won't spoil anything, but the way it resolved not only conflicted with some moral values of one of the characters, but was a very quick and cheap way to wrap things up. It helps resolve Tom's character but it honestly makes Summer's character more unlikable for me. Still, in the end, I had plenty of fun with the movie and I was able to leisurely laugh and smile throughout.