Carried Away

Carried Away

Based on Jim Harrison's book, "Farmer". 47-year-old Joseph Svenden lives on the family farm with his dying mother and teaches at a two room schoolhouse with Rosealee, his lover and his best friend's widow. Joseph, who lacks a college degree, learns that he will lose his teaching job at the end of the year when the school district expands into his town. Meanwhile, he is seduced by 17-year-old Catherine, a new student in his class. His affair with Catherine and losing his teaching job forces Joseph to take a look at his previously dull life and to decide how he wants to live the rest of it.

Joseph Svenden is a middle-aged schoolteacher who lives on a farm with his dying mother. In his simple life there are no excitements, even in long-time relationship with a widow. However, ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


You may also like

Carried Away torrent reviews

Harrison W (gb) wrote: I'm not even really familiar with The National, but I loved this movie. Tom and Matt are like 2 sides of one person. We all want to be like Matt but we're much closer to Tom. This was a disarmingly human movie that will make your heart explode.

Tanner C (us) wrote: I hate this movie with a burning passion. It makes me feel pain on a deep psychological level.

Bruno L (kr) wrote: Amazingly sad/beautiful movie. Exceptionally well done. It was really good the way which it portrays the story about the civil rights movement. The musicians chosen to perform the songs were very well selected. It was impressive to see/hear the emotions from all the musicians.

Mikhail B (kr) wrote: A conpulsive gambler escapes his wife and goes to Las Vegas where he meets his daughter Amanda working as a prostitute and attempts to rescue her, while she doesn't want to be rescued. Nobody becomes a better man in the process, but the audience gets its laughs.

Hank V (it) wrote: It's kind of a chick-flick. But I'm weird and I like those once in a while. There's some likeable characters here, and even the ones who aren't so likeable are still very believable.

Zsfia W (mx) wrote: Erre most gy hirtelen egy sz jut eszembe: confusing.

Blind P (de) wrote: Next Stop, Greenwich Village passed for its sardonic wit. The story of a struggling young man looking to find his big acting break is not an original premise, but the cast of characters is deep and varied enough to avoid the most trite of cliches. (eg. love conquers all, movie moguls are all corrupt, protagonist seems to lack talent until epiphany strikes) Young Jeff Goldblum plays a bit part, and Christopher Walken a larger and effective role as a bohemian dilettante. The wide ranges of the Village are exemplified in the feast of friends; the actors and play writers, the lovers, the gays, and the suicidal, as is the disapproval of outside communities to the 1950s cultural changes through our hero's disapproving, histrionic mother. While it does not manage to move one's emotions, there is still enough to ponder and thus it passes the Spin.

Anthony T (es) wrote: Wayne, Mitchum, Caan, Hawks, guns, horses and Arizona. Can't go wrong with that combo!

Alex H (br) wrote: I'm all for the surreal, i'm all for the weirdness and lack of traditional narrative structure and coherence; but fuck me this was too much... All of Lynch's signature tropes only work when he writes compelling and interesting characters so we the audience can at least engage in that side of the film which act as an anchor while we navigate whatever fucked up dream like web he's spinning in his movies. Unfortunately, Inland Empire has zilch, zero, none which removes any mystique or artistic integrity of the piece and makes the picture feel weird for the sake of being weird. Not to mention, the camcorder footage makes it feel like a 16 year olds attempt at making a David Lynch movie. I get it's cheaper but my god it doesn't half make everything look cheap. Laura Dern is uncontrollably committed to Lynch's material which is admirable but doesn't serve the picture as the material itself is incomprehensible and feels almost like self-parody in many places. Maybe I wouldn't be so disappointed as well if it was 90 mins or even 120 mins... But this was 3 hours... a long, long, three hours. But at least I can say i've seen it now... Whatever that means.

Tim R (br) wrote: Not a bad movie. Hard to understand the Irish. Good actors though.