Combat Shock

Combat Shock

A dangerously disturbed Vietnam veteran struggles with life 15 years after his return home, and slowly falls into insanity from his gritty urban lifestyle.

A dangerously disturbed Vietnam veteran struggles with life 15 years after his return home, and slowly falls into insanity from his gritty urban lifestyle. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Combat Shock torrent reviews

Waleed A (de) wrote: awesome movie. entertaining to the max. good continuation of the story with lots of good connections to the past ones. was awesome to see characters from all 4 previous movies meet for the first time. amazing action of all sorts, racing, shooting, fighting, chasing. so many crazy scenes and omg moments. also had some stupid stuff as expected, and what's up with vin diesel's voice lol (4 viewings)

Guido S (us) wrote: A few Americans in Germany discover the beer Olympics and want to win it in order to keep their family name proud. They return to the states and prepare with their friends. A pretty solid movie from Broken Lizard, like this one more than Club Dredd but not as much as Super Troopers. Pretty much what you would expect from a movie about drinking beer in a foreign country but it's fun to watch and pretty funny. Just not as good as Troopers.

Bryan F (gb) wrote: You know, if I was making a movie titled after one of the Great Old Ones I'd work really, really hard to make sure it was suitably terrifying. There are lots of good ideas here, but it's disjointed and confusing in an annoying way, not a frightening way. Loses major points for a) including Tori Spelling in the cast, and b) not killing off Tori Spelling -- is there some other reason for having her in movies besides giving the audience cathartic relief from her acting attempts by her character's vicious death?

Cheryl T (us) wrote: Loved it, actually thought it was better than the bourne trilogy! Kept me on the edge of my seat the whole time... :)

Ken S (ru) wrote: Blacula is an interesting blaxploitation horror movie, but that doesn't mean that it is that good. It is very 70s, very blaxploitation, but it isn't very horror or scary. It can be fun to watch, but not always. If you are in the mood for this kind of thing then by all means, but don't go in expecting scares.

George F (gb) wrote: very good mafia movie.

Kurt N (jp) wrote: Make no mistake: this is your typical action hero flick attempting to disguise itself as something more. Pacing is dull and I found it tiring to continue to watch the film, all to have it not pay off with your very cliche hero-saves-girl-from-badguy ending. It's even down my the docks! Absolutely disappointing. Also, I'm trying to understand what the thought process is about Hannibal's character development, because he grows from being vengeful to being vengeful without regard, but never crosses into psychotic. Ever.

Laura M (au) wrote: I found this movie more accessible and engaging than the 2012 movie, but that's not too surprising since 90's scifi is what I grew up wit so all the tropes and level of quality in this movie is familiar. It was also a nice change from the modern dystopia in which this movie presents a struggle between those of power so when there's the option to try a different way,the possibly fallible system remains because it's what the people in power know best

Shashank S (mx) wrote: Its simple and truthful but just like any other teen drama its highly predictable and nothing new.

Scott A (gb) wrote: Very very very boring. There are only 3 deaths in this film from snakes, and the first isn't for 105 minutes!!! Most of it feels like a PBS special on handling snakes. Seeing FACE, from A-Team, turn into a snake was fun, but the movie just ends out of nowhere? Also, there is a sex scene and a skinny dipping scene. They added cartoon looking branches and a book shelf to avoid showing any Heather Menzie nudity. WTF?

Timo S (br) wrote: The film offers thrill and action, but also some moments where the two villains are contrast each other brilliantly: the silent hitman (Rourke) and the rowdy psychotic small time criminal (Gordon-Levitt). The final moments of the film echo the importance of the contrast: one doesn't make mistakes in what he does, while the other literally spills his bullets.The problem of the film is that where the villains are interesting, the couple they are after are not, which simply makes them rather flat and dull. Their dysfunctional relationship is not very well described to the audience, it doesn't really evolve, nor does it have any conclusion (one way or the other). I read they had to cut some material out in the Missouri part of the film, which probably would have that something that was missing from the characters. In this edition, they simply function as a target, but the characters aren't interesting.I think the plot isn't very original as it is more or less a hit gone bad, which leads to more head hunting. It could be better if the targets were more interesting. Nevertheless, I think Rourke and Gordon-Levitt make this film worth watching.