You may also like
De wisselwachter torrent reviews
Kareem E (ru) wrote: there is something missing.. but I like it
Michael K (fr) wrote: I've given this two stars even though I didn't get through the entire film. It was fairly standard stuff that fit the synopsis exactly which is why I got bored watching it. You'd think that a film which uses such a rich starting context would be bursting with ideals, moral conundrums and imagination yet it's not. The direction was flat and the acting pretty formulaic. Despite the potential for some huge questions and real political agitation the film devles into the characters which is fine except when you haven't really given us time to get into why these people felt the way they did. So after watching the first part of the story unfold which was relatively interesting I gave up when the film shifted forward in time. There were some interesting characters under all this, unfortunately they were fairly two dimensional and when the kids came into the scene I'd had just about enough. There was still an hour left to go. I understand the first half of the film is better than the second too so probably saved myself a valuable hour.
Peter H (gb) wrote: Wasnt as good as the 2nd one, but still enjoyable to watch, ended a bit sudden.
Laura M (gb) wrote: This movie was an homage to The Godfather (1972) and I enjoyed all of it. It manage to strike that balance between being of the same vein as what it's adapting/admiring but also being its own thing. I'll probably watch the sequel because I heard it's just as good, and I am always up for more Bachchans.
Jess L (au) wrote: Really, really, really, really, REALLY bad.
(jp) wrote: I'm not even interested in seeing this movie.
Emma S (ag) wrote: What can i say...You've got Goldie Steve Cleesey who are some of the best actors and comedians ever!
Rhea C (au) wrote: very funny, and i got it.
S S (ag) wrote: The dumbest movie that I(TM)ve ever seen. Made me laugh, though, so I have to give it a little credit. :)
nurcan a (mx) wrote: I played in this movie as an extra.. but have never watched it
Sgt C (gb) wrote: (76%)A brilliant sequel and a true horror classic that every horror fan should watch at least once. The first unlucky victims murder is really quite strong and brutal, and when one takes into account the 1966 release date it must have really shocked a lot of people back in the day. A great film with top direction and fantastic set design, only let down by the lack of Peter Cushing and the poor decision not to give any lines at all to Christopher Lee, I kind of see what they were going for, but Lee should have been treated a lot better and given something to say. Dracula spoke a lot in the book so there is little reason to mute him here, still a solid movie though and worthy of anyone's time.
Kevin C (fr) wrote: A Very Good War Movie.
mark v (gb) wrote: Boring half assed plot with no real direction.
John R (es) wrote: Great film of the Irish uprising during the early 190o to break from British rule. Only wish I had watched this before I visited Dublin. I would've had a deeper appreciation of the many of the sites I saw there. Only weak point was Julia Roberts. Wish they would've found a good authentic Irish actress to play her part. Her trying to act Irish takes away from the film.
Brian P (fr) wrote: Marilyn Monroe and Ribert Mitchum make a good team in a different kind of western in a rare setting...the northwest.