Rachel hasn't been out of the house since being left at the altar two months ago, but some superficial rebound sex tonight and she'll be over Mark for good...if she can just deal with these goddamn vampires. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Rachel hasn't been out of the house since being left at the altar two months ago, but some superficial rebound sex tonight and she'll be over Mark for good...if she can just deal with these goddamn vampires.
You may also like
Dick Night torrent reviews
Joshua M (us) wrote: Kutcher being a spitting image of the man he's portraying, it turns out, isn't enough to save this one. Admittedly, watching this AFTER the other Steve Jobs biopic ended up damning this one more than it damns itself with fluffy, half-cocked storytelling that perpetually seems to be on its way to a point but never actually reaches one. But hey, at least the actors look like the guys, right?? Points for the casting director!
Robert S (us) wrote: I don't understand why this movie gets hated ease off fellas, this movie is fun & goofy it could have been better, Hartnett gives a good performance as always, I thought this movie was unique I really enjoyed how the atmosphere felt...
Toni W (it) wrote: Not the best movie but a very good drama to introduce people to this horrible crime.
ray s (nl) wrote: Bad Dialouge And Most Of The Acting Sucked But I Liked The Storyline Its Worth A Watch If U Have Time
Mark W (it) wrote: A reminder of how the Italian Giallo Maestro can build tension and atmosphere ex nihilo. Freudian plot strands ahoy, Argento has never been so brilliant and paradoxically terrible as this.
David A (ag) wrote: If you were to think of it as a Merchant Ivory remake of A Beautiful Mind you wouldn't be far wrong.This is an atmospheric costume drama. It makes interesting use of flashbacks and these combine with fine performances to give a real feeling of being transported. As a whole it has a finely judged disturbing and disoriented atmosphere.
Teresa D (ca) wrote: Great movie!! Sad and Romantic...
Prithviraj P (us) wrote: 6/7 of my frnds hv rated it not interested...i wonder if they've read the synopsis or the subject matter!
The N (fr) wrote: otro caso ms donde el poster es mejor que la pelcula
Joshua M (it) wrote: Managed to create the same fear in the first movie, and although it wasn't fantastic, at least this sequel was daring enough to be entertaining.
Tasos L (ag) wrote: A very good horror film with Cushing as a leader of a religious brotherhood...
Post G (it) wrote: Bold and interesting film, which is to be expected from Frankenheimer. Fascinating story, perhaps let down a little by a few historical inaccuracies.
Leonardo B (mx) wrote: I loved the book, and I enjoyed the movie. I read the reviews when it was released in theatres and I was afraid that the movie would betray my love of the book. But it didn't. I know the movie is quite different from the book here and there but I didn't mind too much. Bridges was a perfect choice for the giver in my opinion an Jonas is portrayed pretty well too. The use of cheap CGI bothered me a few times and could have been done better. Definitely not perfect but it is on Netflix and I'd say it's worth a watch.
Paul D (kr) wrote: Fine low budget horror-chiller, with a good eerie, but modern day mood captured in the direction.