Five years after the events of the first film, the Ghostbusters have been plagued by lawsuits and court orders, and their once-lucrative business is bankrupt. However, when Dana begins to have ghost problems again, the boys come out of retirement only to be promptly arrested. The Ghostbusters discover that New York is once again headed for supernatural doom, with a river of ectoplasmic slime bubbling beneath the city and an ancient sorcerer attempting to possess Dana's baby and be born anew. Can the Ghostbusters quell the negative emotions feeding the otherworldly threat and stop the world from being slimed? . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Five years after they defeated Gozer, the Ghostbusters are out of business. When Dana begins to have ghost problems again, the boys come out of retirement to aid her and hopefully save New York City from a new paranormal threat.
You may also like
Ghostbusters II torrent reviews
Matt H (jp) wrote: I don't know what you are looking at~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~,~,~,~,~,~,~,~,
Gareth M (ag) wrote: Good film take a bit of time to get goin but when it does its funny, lovin daft ass endin
Nancy W (br) wrote: ...and Netflix doesn't have it...
Michael T (es) wrote: Tommy Lee Jones is always dependable as an actor, but one would expect more from Bertrand Tavernier as director; uneven and overlong.
Santosh V (ru) wrote: One of the best Indian movies I saw... :)
Nicki M (ru) wrote: Good movie, well acted. I have rated it highly because it was obviously of a high standard, but for me personally, I didn't love it, and would not watch it again. It is a little confusing, and the racism issues, while important, ruin what would have - for me - worked better as a straightforward crime movie. I am sure there are many who would enjoy this.
Nena S (ca) wrote: The acting in this movie is wonderful with the exception of Marlon Brando. Montgomery Clift was originally going to play the role of Maj. Weldon Penderton and I think it would have made all the difference. This movie would have been great had he played this role. Unfortunately, Clift had died and the role was recast. I love Marlon Brando, but not in this role. He's strange and you can barely understand what he's saying throughout the movie. I loved the sepia toned/gold tinted cinematography. I though it was clever and definitely added a creative touch to the movie. My only other complaint was the lack of character development. Why was Pvt. L.G. Williams so strange? Even a minor flashback would have been perfect. Taylor whipping Brando into shape is an amazing scene and definitely epic. Zorro David as Anacleto is definitely a stand out. I've read complaints about the movie being bizarre, but that is not really a problem for me. Foreign films are founded on strange concepts, but they are always beautifully played out on the screen. I think the same is true for this movie. Elizabeth Taylor is perfection. I love her movies. Julie Harris, Brian Keith, and Robert Forster are great in their roles. I typically judge a movie by my distraction level during the movie and I was not distracted. This one is definitely worth checking out. John Huston makes great movies.
Thomas T (fr) wrote: Good but not as good as the classic!
Margarita S (nl) wrote: Pacino did an incredible job as Tony Montana. It's so impressive how compelling he is on screen. That said, there were some problematic aspects to the development of Montana as a character. He's depicted as a ruthless, power-hungry, self-absorbed person for 3/4 of the movie only to then suddenly develop a conscience so as to facilitate a major turn in the plot. It's poorly conceived. Given how long the movie ran, it was surprising that so many supporting characters were only half-baked or sub-stories were inadequately developed. I personally don't get the appeal of this gangster film. Watch the original. It was better developed.
Kristy P (ca) wrote: More spoofy than I would have thought...but then it IS Dennis Quaid, so what can we expect? Stanley Tucci's character is hilarious though!! "I...am...Muerte!!!!"