Goo waak jai 2: Ji maang lung gwoh gong

Goo waak jai 2: Ji maang lung gwoh gong

N/A

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:101 minutes
  • Release:1996
  • Language:Cantonese,English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:gang,   sequel,   triad,  

The story in Young and Dangerous 2 is told in two parts: the first focuses on Chicken and his exile in Taiwan skipped over in the first film. The second half deals with the Hung Hing Society trying to ally with Chicken's Taiwanese triad "San Luen". The character "Banana" (Jerry Lam) is recruited into Ho Nam's circle. At the same time, an election to obtain the branch leadership status of Causeway Bay is underway, with Chan Ho Nam as its prime candidate, until a rivalry breaks out between him and another Hung Hing member, "Tai Fei" (Anthony Wong). . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Goo waak jai 2: Ji maang lung gwoh gong torrent reviews

Richard H (mx) wrote: Absolute shocker.. The most overacted movie i have had the displeasure of wasting my time with. Just dont do it.

Marko S (ag) wrote: Pretty good horror B-flick with a twist in the middle.

Cristbal S (it) wrote: It's consistently funny, but its story is just awful and predictable from the very beginning.

Eric H (us) wrote: This film is completely hilarious. Lily Tomlin is hysterical, and Ben Stiller plays his usual smart yet neurotic self. The jokes are smart and funny and the characters are offbeat and absurd. A great sleeper. A comedy for the branier set.

Douglas L (nl) wrote: Too much to say on this one. Great script and Jack gives an excellent performance. He really shows us what he is capable of. Everyone does for that matter. Loved the look of the old film stock, the colors are great.

Joseph S (jp) wrote: I saw this movie as a kid and still enjoyed this as an adult.

Matt (ag) wrote: This gets a bit of a rough ride but I think it stands up on its own. Well acted, although the ending is a bit muddled.

Ben L (ag) wrote: There's a vibe that feels similar to Charade in this film (although it's not quite up to that standard.) It's not just the presence of Audrey Hepburn either, but it's the playful interaction between her and Peter O'Toole that makes it shine. I don't think they have a ton of chemistry, and the romance seemed to come out of nowhere, but when the writing is this strong I kind of overlook those flaws.The script is great because it has a lot of crazy complexity to everyone's story, and yet it still manages to maintain clear goals and agendas for all the characters. There's a lot of comedy in the setup as we learn all the history of these people, and their art. The laughs distract from the fact that it takes a long time to get the climax going. It did seem like the movie was in danger of dragging on too long, but it never got so bad I would say I was "bored."The 3rd act is when the title of the film comes into play and it transitions into one of my favorite types of movies. I adore a good heist, and this is back in the days before silly electronic gadgets and complex computer systems, so it took some extra cunning. It was so much fun to slowly realize what was happening and to discover their plan. It's made even better by the fact that they have 2 amazing lead actors to carry the story. How to Steal a Million is a fun little romp. It has laughs, romance, and adventure. I commend the script because it is so smart. I miss movies like this that could make you laugh with nothing more than clever wordplay. Also, they gave the film a wholly original setup that was both ridiculous and yet logical. Add in a fabulous cast and you have a movie that I greatly enjoyed, and would like to watch again sometime.