Giancarlo Giannini stars as the nameless hero, a disaffected media executive who spends his days watching violent programming on the six television screens in his office and his evenings neglecting his frustrated wife at home. An encounter with an apparently delusional old friend who claims to be in mortal danger, and the friend’s alluring nymphomaniac wife, provides a temporary respite from drab routine. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
A disaffected media executive who spends his days watching violent programming on the six television screens in his office and his evenings is neglecting his frustrated wife at home.
You may also like
Good News torrent reviews
Adrian B (nl) wrote: En terminos generales considero que la pelicula esta muy bien lograda, aun cuando la premisa no es muy inovadora. El desarrollo de los personajes esta bien logrado y el desarrollo de la historia esta muy bien llevado. La pelicula muestra la crudeza de un mundo de violencia en el cual accidentalmente se involucran Heli y el resto de su familia; pero logra mostrar esto sin necesidad de recurrir a efectos especiales demasiado trabajados o a excesos graficos. La historia esta bien trabajada y bien plasmada con un ritmo muy particular del director y adecuado para la pelicula.
Charlie J (kr) wrote: Meh.Unsatisfying ends to well thought out stories. A movie could've been made about any of the stories specifically and been a success, but since it flashed all over the place, the movie was utterly insignificant.
Ricardo A (ca) wrote: Despite feeling too predictable, Not Safe for work is a tight and little thriller that keeps you entertained.
Matthew L (au) wrote: A cracking Scooby-Doo adventure, that doesn't waste a single moment and will stand up to multiple repeat viewings. The voice cast are all on top form, especially Lillard taking over from the retired Casey Kasem as Shaggy and making the jump from the live action role.
Matt B (au) wrote: An introduction to Brecht, the roots of contemporary theater, and Marxism. Fascinating, but not terribly well put together or even that engaging, unless any of the above fascinate you on their own.
Richard C (us) wrote: As a direct to dvd movie it's better than expected. Not as good as the original, but pretty fun on it's own.
John R (de) wrote: 140607: Seems to be typical Tarantino fare. Extreme characters with unique personality quirks. Lots of action and violence. Cars and car chases. Women. Movie for guys who like movies.
Matthew S (gb) wrote: Movies seldom manage to this entertaining and poetic at the same time. Payne's Sideways is full of magical surprises.
Daniel K (mx) wrote: Corny 90's Action at its finest with Seagal at the reigns, while its not the best the genre has its still good fun to watch.
Jose C (it) wrote: Good script but too slow development... a runaway film
Faley A (au) wrote: 3rd class pirate movie, full of shit..But i have to admit, PIRATES OF THE CARRI BEANS is highly influenced by this movie, storyline is almost same!! should be credited for that !!
Kevin L (nl) wrote: In Paris, an ex-cop falls in love with a prostitute, and tries to get her out of that life by paying for all of her time. Not so easy...
James S (ag) wrote: Well if there isn't a more diverse director than Ang Lee, maybe the only director who's films vary more would be Richard Linklater, (A Scanner Darkly, Boyhood, Dazed and Confused, School of Rock) or the late great Stanley Kubrick, (The Shining, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Full Metal Jacket). After the overblown, over serious mess of Hulk, Ang Lee has a go at another incredibly serious and incredibly worthy effort in Brokeback Mountain, just on a much lower budget. This time instead of subverting the action comic book movie Ang Lee has a go at subverting the equally serious and bravado filled genre of the western. Y'know I want Ang Lee to go off and make a stoner comedy. See how he likes that. Based on the eponymous short story by Annie Proulx, Brokeback Mountain follows the forbidden love of two gay cowboys and how they have to suppress their love in order to live. It stars Jake Gyllenhaal, (Donnie Darko, Nightcrawler, Zodiac) and Heath Leger, (The Dark Knight, 10 Things I Hate About You) as the gay cowboys amid a fine supporting cast that includes Anne Hathaway, Kate Mara, and David Harbour. It was actually quite entertaining to see people who have since gone on to bigger and better roles and think 'oh that went on to do that thing, like House of Cards, Stranger Things, and um... Fantastic Four'. The real star of this film though is Ang Lee. His auterial fingers are all over this one. It's got the same trade mark sort of natural beauty and landscape poetry that we saw in things like Life of Pi and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, and it's got the kind of worthy, sedentary pace we've come to expect from him, as well as the sort of outsider's eye to american genres that he's shown in other works. Aside from that it's clearly a very technically minded and stylish film, and technically it is very well made. Ang Lee wanted to show off and he did, but in a way that's also the problem. There is a degree of detachment to this film that stops you getting really emotionally involved. Watching it, I feel one removed from what's happening on screen in front of me. Now, to take a film like Drive, that's a film with a plot that wouldn't necessarily have you emotionally involved, but the high professionals sheen and style serves to get you involved. Whereas I feel in this film the high style of it only served to detach me from a story that I would otherwise naturally be emotionally involved in. It is a very involving story, and I did feel for the characters, (Heath Leger in the leading role truly shines in a very understated performance, died too young), but at the same time I felt like an outsider looking in, very much like Ang Lee himself is, instead of being truly into the story. There's something about how wiggy is is, something about the performances in some roles that doesn't quite gel. I would have preferred Ang Lee to focus on the essentials that convince you of the world instead of how to capture a nice shot, or the hair and make up for the period setting. I feel like now I need to talk about Jake Gyllenhaal. His has this underlying creepiness, this sort of gaunt visage that he played perfectly in Nightcrawler, but here, he's kind of miscast as the live wire romantic of the couple. He comes across as disingenuous and his liveliness is honestly more irritating because he just doesn't make it seem natural.In the end Brokeback Mountain is a very solid film, but it lacks the emotional involvement to elevate it to something great.
Carol H (mx) wrote: A darkly funny comedy that hits all the right notes.
Naomi W (mx) wrote: Beautiful cinematography with an interesting story. Though it is not completely factual, I do not condone the author of the book or the movie director for taking certain creative liberties. Many people make the mistake that because it is one of the few movies out there about geishas, they think everything should be nonfiction about it. And despite the movie taking a few liberties about the actual culture, there is much they got right. Those wanting to see it for educational purposes also have to keep in mind that because the actual world of professional geishas are so closed off, there is not much information out there about it. All in all, I thought it was a beautiful, entertaining movie that shares a bit on a culture that is mostly closed off to the world.
Holly E (it) wrote: I question how much of this movie was pulled from reality and the real case a couple years ago and how much is fabricated. Do the press have that big of an influence? It got me wondering?