Story of the early life of genius and Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman.
You may also like
Infinity torrent reviews
Gonalo M (jp) wrote: Diversin para todos, cazando a the wilderpeople
Philippe P (ru) wrote: Une bonne histoire, pas trs bien raconte. Ca ressemble au pilote d'une srie qui pourrait tre sympa. Entre Cold Case et Millenium...
Ethan P (ca) wrote: In Time has a capable cast and a great idea, but they beat their clever premise into your head and smother the story with unnecessary dialogue and twists.
Matt H (mx) wrote: Not bad exactly, but I don't see what Hanks wanted to accomplish with this movie, it's such a weak story with thin characters. The way he portrayed the friendship between Larry and the female college "buddy" felt so false and forced. And with such small stakes, it's pretty lethal he only basically asks Julia Roberts' character out in the last minute of the movie, there's just not enough interest to care about if they end up together. There's no way this movie gets made other than somebody like Tom Hanks, who wrote and directed as well. I'm glad he got to do his pet project, but it's too bad it's just not good. At least it's not an awful effect, just an extremely banal and mediocre one.
Giorgos T (de) wrote: A very entertaining film, with subtle humour.
Private U (fr) wrote: Probably the weakest Miikie movie I've seen yet. Very anticlimactic. Goes absolutely nowhere.
Kyle M (kr) wrote: Funny but weird, with a returned pair-up between its main cast trying to get back together and working it out since an episode of Aniston's "Friends".Aniston's good in both portions of the rom-com, while Stiller's a little more in the romance portion than the comedy. His time to the comedy portion on bringing funny is between the good actor Hoffman doing most of it and Baldwin doing a little like occasionally. (B)(Full review coming soon)
Rasheed T (jp) wrote: Highly realistic visuals but a somewhat uninteresting plot.
rocknblues 8 (it) wrote: Probably the worst Chuck Norris movie. Weak plot, terrible acting, bad editing and amateurish direction. This is really one to skip.
Mark N (nl) wrote: The low budget effects and sets will no doubt remind British viewers of Gerry Anderson live action shows with their minimally dressed passel walls and sparkler rockets. The plot is glacial and quickly out stays it's welcome. The last few scenes raise many interesting questions that the movie could have explored if it had condensed its material into the first 2 acts.
Timothy H (mx) wrote: The singing sucked compared to the original, but the visuals and story were very good...
Ben M (ag) wrote: Yes!!! Just Yes!!! Thought I would have hated it now it's my favourite DC animated film!
Aloura M (br) wrote: A classic, childhood favorite that succeeds through the years.
John S (au) wrote: This is one of the worst CGI movies that had a big budget. It just isn't funny, the animation isn't bad, but it is not funny. Cheap Over the Hedge ripoff.