Jack Reacher

Jack Reacher

In an innocent heartland city, five are shot dead by an expert sniper. The police quickly identify and arrest the culprit, and build a slam-dunk case. But the accused man claims he's innocent and says "Get Jack Reacher." Reacher himself sees the news report and turns up in the city. The defense is immensely relieved, but Reacher has come to bury the guy. Shocked at the accused's request, Reacher sets out to confirm for himself the absolute certainty of the man's guilt, but comes up with more than he bargained for.

A professional gunman has killed five people only with six gunshots. FBI starts a big investigation to find out traces of the murder. But all the traces point out the murder is a man who is in prison. This man doesn’t reveal any things but provide a piece of paper written “Get Jack Reacher” . From here, Jack is pulled into many unexpected situations . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Jack Reacher torrent reviews

Elijah B (us) wrote: No one saw this film coming, no one. Sausage Party is the first R rated computer animated film to hit the silver screen and gets really smart during the entire film with entertaining jokes for adults, strong course language, extremely sexual content and humor.

Krystin D (gb) wrote: If anyone has the super channel this is free right now and I highly recommend watching if if you in philosophy.

Charley G (mx) wrote: I love the dark humor of this move, It's got loads of good actors and actresses especially in their later years and the documentary shtick adds a lot of funny situations. Kristy Alley should play the villain more often.

James H (br) wrote: A sweet story, nicely cast and acted. The Boston location filming is well used. Pleasant screenplay, good score. It can be a little dull at times. Overall though it's good.

Troy M (ru) wrote: Should be called "Angels and INCEST". Best of skin is with yer kin. ;)

monsieur r (jp) wrote: A fine, tense Western, action and drama filled with marshal Burt Lancaster on a one man crusade for justice. Lots of veteran actors in this one and future veteran actors as well. This film is thankfully all Burt Lancaster's. Easy to follow plot too, a bonus. Lawman and marshal of the western town of Bannock, a now older Burt Lancaster as Jered Maddox is on the trail of men he wants to bring back to Bannock or else. But he finds the trail leads to an uncooperative but friend, marshal Robert Ryan of the town of Sabbath. Even the town rises against him. Bringing back to Bannock the cowboys who accidentally shot an old man in Bannock is no easy matter. Lancaster is up to the challenge in a Dirty Harry, matter-of-fact, passionless way. One scene in particular comes between Louis Jordan and Lancaster at a beautiful setting of a lake and waterfall. Jordan aims to fight it out with Lancaster, but all he ends up with is a fine lecture from the lawman. The segment is worth watching all by itself. Directed and produced by Michael Winner, he had a lot to lose by hatching a loser film. But the direction is petty good, much better than I am used to seeing in these older Westerns. While preposterous that a lone lawman can outgun all these revenge filled cowhands of Cobb is simple... Lancaster tells Louis Jordan they are not professional gunmen. This reasonably authentic film reveals a deadly and truthful look at the way the West really was, not always a honest duel. Those with money ran things. The law was in books, for the most part and that was all. Starring Burt Lancaster, Robert Ryan, Robert Duvall and Lee J. Cobb, with many, many others in supporting roles you should be able to recognize. Just a delight to see all these veteran guys in one place. I recommend this Western to suspense/action fans of serious dramas. Why this was rated PG I will never know as there is violent shooting and death all around plus bed scenes. Cast Lee J. Cobb (veteran actor plays Bronson, the rich cattle rancher and big man in the county) Robert Duvall (works for Cobb, he too ambushes Lancaster) Richard Jordan (Cobb cowhand, in several Wayne westerns) John Hillermam Burt Lancaster (the Lawman Maddox, sheriff of Bannon) Sheree North Robert Ryan (sheriff, meek and a Cobb hired man, but good) Crew Costume Designer: Ron Beck Composer: Jerry Fielding Production Designer: Stan Jolley Set Decorator : Ray Moyer Cinematographer: Robert Paynter Editor: Frederick Wilson Screenplay: Gerald Wilson Art Director: Herbert Westbrook Director: Michael Winner Producer: Michael Winner

Carolann C (au) wrote: great movie loved it

Will J (br) wrote: Will Ferrell, Vince Vaughn, and Luke Wilson. Just from the cast, you knew that this would be fantastic. A mix of very raunchy comedy, and surprisingly great story. This is a must see for pretty much anyone who enjoys comedies. Mitch, is one of my favorite characters in this movie. He's pretty much the brains of the group. He is funny at times, but he mainly solves all of the problems in this film. Frank is hilarious! When he goes streeking that is his best part by far! I think he is the funniest in this ill by far. He knows how to lighten the mood. Beanie was...well...I'm not sure what to say about him. He is the only one with a child. He has is moments like the earmuffs. That is freaking funny as all get out! But other than that part he is just a...a floater. He floats around the group of people.In the end this is a great raunchy comedy. If you like stupid but great laugh movies-this is for you.

Charlie G (gb) wrote: Two invalids from the past come to the present and meet the nobles descendant. Typical misunderstand of modern technology. Been done before.

Joseph S (it) wrote: What is the happiest moment of your life? If you had to pick one moment, one memory to keep with you and the rest were going to be erased what would it be? This is the central question of Afterlife a film about life, memory, happiness, movie making, and only in tangent, death. A group of dead people arrive at a dilapidated building where they are told to select a single memory that they will dwell in for all eternity. Heaven as it turns out is only a memory. The film is mostly these people talking directly into the camera documentary style reflecting on what was most important to them. I recently told a friend about this movie, who told me it sounded "corny", and if the film had only been about these people I, might agree. I told my friend that I liked the film because while watching it I reflected on my entire life, and what happiness had meant to me during it. I was almost shocked and a little saddened by how quickly I came to realize what my moment was, like the movie as a whole it leaves a bittersweet taste. My friend told me they didn't think about their life that way, and that it would be too depressing to do so. I told her that someone in the movie says that too, and what made the movie as a whole so good and not just a clever concept was how honest it was about the complications between notions of a meaningful life, nostalgia, and personal happiness. The dead have a half a week to choose which memory they want and the rest of the week is spent filming the memories in a sound studio. The screening at the end of the week is to be their moment of "ascension". Though silent at first the "counselors" shooting these memory-movies are not separate from the process, they too are dead. Takashi and his trainee Shiori we see handle most of the cases. It becomes clear that Shiori is infatuated with Takashi, but in a bureaucratic purgatory with dozens of films to make what time is there for love? And what would love possibly entail in such a place. Takashi is only concerned with his duties as counselor and helping people to clearly define their eternity. Everyone is ostensibly dead, but otherwise they are completely normal; eating, bathing, shaving, feeling warm, cold, anxious, and uncertain. Afterlife despite its title is not a film about death, but about memory and self-reflection. Two characters become problematic early on, one an old man who says he cant remember his life clearly enough to choose a specific moment, the other a young man who refuses to chose a moment, insisting it would be "avoiding responsibility for his life" and a surrender to empty nostalgia. Takashi becomes interested in the old man's case(for personal reasons we discover later), and has the man's life sent to him on videotape so that he may observe and report, in a quieter variation on Albert Brook's "Defending Your Life" (a conceptual cousin and precursor to Afterlife). I've never really been interested in seeing the greatest films ever made. I like to tell myself that one day I will get around to seeing all of the classics, but at the moment what makes me love cinema are viewing moments that do not just impress me for technical reasons, but that connect to me personally. Sometimes these connections are tangible and explainable with experiences that mirror my own, but with others they are intangible where I glimpse things I could never fully express but feel deeply as if I've known them forever. I think this is why many people watch films, at times to identify and at others to connect with what is unidentifiable. Afterlife is about producing films that capture only a single moment and that only have meaning to single person; films that will only be screened once, but will be remembered literally forever. They are so personal as to be inconsequential to anyone but their intended viewer, but I couldn't think of a more meaningful type of film to make both for an audience and their creators. Russian silent film director Aleksandr Medvedkin used to travel the USSR on a train stopping at random villages and asking the people what their problems, issues, and concerns were and then asked for their assistance in making a film about just that. Doing this Medvedkin wanted to give cinema to the masses. The world of Afterlife likewise gives cinema to the individual. Visually I've heard the film compared to Yasijiru Ozu, and since most of the film consists of static shots, I can understand the comparison, but I haven't seen enough of his work to comment one way or the other. I can say it is simple, sparse, documentary like, and non-obtrusive. Its style is intimate, serene, and quiet, in opposition to the romantic comic zaniness of Brook's "Defending Your Life"; which I also enjoyed, for vastly different reasons. It would have been understandable if this film was absorbed by the fantasy it springs from, but it remains so rooted in the interactions of its characters and the nuanced performances of its actors, that it feels effortlessly natural. There are sprinklings of melodrama in the film towards the end, but they allow the characters to actually reach important conclusions that the film wouldn't have been able to connect together otherwise. Even if you can't remember your own moment, isn't it possible that you are an extra or a main character in someone else's, and nothing as dramatic as some old flame pining over you, but maybe a moment spent with a friend or a family member. Maybe your parent's happiest moment was when you were born. It's only from an imaginary position like an Afterlife that we have the distance to reflect on such grand feelings intimately and sincerely. Since were not dead, this question can be written off as sophomoric or corny, our best days may in fact still be ahead. But I wonder if without some prior sense of what is truly beautiful, meaningful, and warm fuzziness incarnate whether we can know true bliss when we finally see it. This is assuming it's something you can even know when you see it, and not something that only occurs with memory. I was once told in a Sunday Sermon, happiness is predicated on happenings and events, but joy was something internal that had little relation to the outside world. Personally I think real happiness is created when memories generate joy that later events cannot soil or touch. In one scene Shiori speaks to a young girl who chose Disneyland and a ride on Splash Mountain as her moment, and tells her she is the 40th person to pick that same episode. Later the young girl reconsiders and chooses a moment with her mother doing laundry; a less exciting event, and not one that would come to mind quickly, but one closer to heart. Ultimately Afterlife is a beatific trip down memory lane that asks us questions that most people spend their lives asking themselves; I am happy, am I satisfied, and what are perfection, peace, and bliss. It handles these questions with minimal pretenses, conversationally and without judgment and reminds me of why I watch movies, and why I like sharing the things I love with others. At the end I just wanted to give this film a big hug. I can't think of any flaws in this or anything I wanted to see but didn't. Nor anything I felt was out of place, distracting, or insincere. The only objections I could reasonably see are often spoken by the characters themselves, particularly the young man, who thinks the entire system is flawed; what do they do if a baby dies for instance? My own moment (and no I will not tell you nor anyone else) was actually quite "corny", in fact it was the first time in my life I realized why a certain kind of sentimentality existed. This movie is sentimental for sure, but it's definitely sincere. If we get lucky in this universe and there is an Afterlife, we would all be very fortunate to find ourselves in a movie theaters like these with kind hearted counselors to help us grieve for and accept our lives, and if there isn't well at least there's still movies like Afterlife; things worth seeing, things worth talking about, and things worth sharing with each other.