Kevin Bridges: The Story Continues...
Kevin Bridges: The Story Continues... sees Kevin return to The SECC to perform a record-breaking run of ten sold out nights to over 75,000 ecstatic fans. Recorded on a Saturday night in Glasgow, Kevin is in his element, as this home town gig shows off his no nonsense approach to comedy. He cuts through the niceties with his Glaswegian man in the street charm to the next chapter of his epic comedic journey.
Kevin Bridges: The Story Continues... sees Kevin return to The SECC to perform a record-breaking run of ten sold out nights to over 75,000 ecstatic fans. Recorded on a Saturday night in Glasgow, Kevin is in his element, as this home town gig shows off his no nonsense approach to comedy. He cuts through the niceties with his Glaswegian man in the street charm to the next chapter of his epic comedic journey. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Kevin Bridges: The Story Continues... torrent reviews
(kr) wrote: I normally love Katie Holmes but this by far was one of the worst movies. Slow, weird, & just boring.
(ag) wrote: When you watch the screen, it's usually pretty obvious where you should look and at which people. But not in "Lourdes". These long sequences are filled with people. Everywhere you look at that screen, something happens. That's the first of director Jessica Hausner's miracles.Christine has MS and bound for wheelchair for the rest of her life. She can only move her head and her face muscles. She can't eat without help, can't get to the toilet and there are of course feelings of envy towards people and anger against God.This is shown in such a splendid, quiet way. This is not a film of big physical expression. Emotions like jealousy, slightly growing passion and disappointment are fully readable, but only through a move by the head.How boring this sounds and how little boring it is. Christine is cured, but is it by God? Is this a miracle? Does this man like her or is he just interested in her health, in her as a miracle object? You can read it from his shy body language. And this roommate. Is she a helper or just somebody who wants Christine back to her disease? Is the helper in fact the devil, who hates all miracles, both those performed by a god and those who come from his children? So many questions here. So much reality in an environment, which lacks realism.
(it) wrote: Shit poor quality and delightfully offensive.
(ru) wrote: Culture and family honour collide in this story - great performance by the lead actress.
(br) wrote: The first 2/3 of this film are a drag. Terribly dull. It could have been an interesting film if it wasn't too much like an episode of Law and Order. The character TJ is terrible and ruins the film. The 3rd act finally has some interesting elements in it, but at this point you don't care about anyone. Pass.
(es) wrote: It's rare accomplishment for any kind of filmmaker, whether he might be a veteran of this medium or just newcomer starting out, to create a kind of engaging, endlessly-fascinating environment that Proyas brought to the screen in The Crow. Now, with his follow-up movie, ''Dark City'', the director incredibly manages to one-up himself. 1998's ''Dark City'' is quite a remarkable film also quite a cerebral film. You really have to pay attention if you want to follow the plotline perfectly. I feel like i have to see it again to fully enjoy and immerse myself into the full experience that is ''Dark City''The writing is excellent, original, mysterious, surprising, thrilling and dense. The performances are very solid, e.g Rufus Sewell as the paranoid leading man who suffers from memory-loss, Kiefer Sutherland as the peculiar doctor, John Hurt as the hard-headed detective, and Jennifer Connely as the ''wife'' of Sewell's character.''Dark City'' has lots of remarkable scenes, but the one that stands out the most is the boat ride scene with Murdoch, Bumstead and Schreber. That scene hits you like a ton of bricks. However, it is quite expositional.A tiny detail i noticed (that i loved, and i hope is an intention reference) was in an opening shot that approaches the hotel window behind which we meet Murdoch. The window is a circular dome in a rectangular frame. As clearly as possible, it looks like the "face" of Hal 9000 in "2001: A Space Odyssey" Hal was a computer that understood everything, except what it was to be human and have emotions. "Dark City" considers the same theme in a film that creates a completely artificial world in which humans teach themselves to be themselves.The two (slight) problems i had is that the movie is original and has lots of creative ideas, but actually really isnt that original (it's not that Dark City itself was unoriginal, more that the themes expressed in it have been explored in a variety of movies since, and before the movie's been released. Possibly making it a transformative work for the time, but less impactful watching it as a modern viewer.?), it's like an assembly of a whole lot of other films, and Proyas has done that with meticulous precision. Movies that come to mind that have a lot of the same elements are (Some will be movies that were released subsequently but still): Brazil, Metropolis, The Matrix, The Truman Show, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, The City of the Lost Children, M, Nosferatu, Inception, Memento, The Game, Total Recall, Blade Runner, The Twilight Zone, Kafka, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, and maybe even a little bit of Batman and The Fifth Element. This doesnt make this movie bad at all, but it was quite obvious and noticed it quite some times throughout watching the film. The other slight problem being, that it can be quite confusing to watch and you really need to have your head in the game, otherwise you will be lost in the story. A second viewing will most likely be very rewarding.''Dark City'' is not a story so much as an experience, it is a triumph of art direction, set design, cinematography, special effects and imagination.
(ag) wrote: Not as good as the first two but certainly better than part three Resurrection restores the potential of the science fiction horror classic by improved special effects and likeable characters.
(nl) wrote: I loved the film. Saw it as a kid and found it fun.
(jp) wrote: no thanks not my thing
(fr) wrote: Shameless fanservice: the movie.
(de) wrote: A sold-out insult to the original Looney Tunes cartoon
(br) wrote: If only there was some way to release this film to the world, I know it would solve all our problems.