Kutsal Damacana 2: Itmen

Kutsal Damacana 2: Itmen

Safak Sezer as a sailor who returns to Istanbul, following misadventures with Somali pirates and a sojourn in a Budhist monastery, to do battle with a werewolf. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Kutsal Damacana 2: Itmen torrent reviews

Cyndi G (gb) wrote: Couldn't even sit through the first hour. Painfully simpleminded profanity filled plotless flick. Didn't hold a candle to Knocked Up.

Diana D (gb) wrote: It was not at all the movie I was expecting it to be. Had good moments.

Pascal L (nl) wrote: ?tonnant, et mme trs suprieur au "This is it" de Michael Jackson. La question qu'on doit se poser est: Pourquoi je l'ai cout?

Adrienne L (fr) wrote: OMG this is terrible. I warn anyone curious to avoid it. Trust me.

Steve S (gb) wrote: ***Due to the recent RT changes that have basically ruined my past reviews, I am mostly only giving a rating rather than a full review.***

Ryan H (es) wrote: I'm sorry Matt Gomez, if you see/read this. I feel like me disliking this would disappoint you. The question that arises while watching this movie is how much information should the story teller give the audience at a given time? I loved this for the exercise in trying to discover what's the smallest end possible. I also loved the way none of these characters can be remotely seen as all good or all bad. However, I didn't fully believe in all the decisions Jackie made, and I also felt like after a while Arnold was forcefully trying not to tell us things. The holding back of information works at first. I was really sucked in when I began to see things unravel. At the wedding everyone tells Jackie that they haven't seen her in a while and a man says he wants to be able to mourn someone just like she can. We also know previously that a man is out of prison that effects Jackie, but he also doesn't know what she looks like. We can connect the pieces that someone close to Jackie has been killed and this man who has been let out of prison early for good behavior has something to do with it. The problem is the only thing we get after that is figuring out Clyde killed Jackie's husband and child. What keeps us going though is the interest in the characters. Clyde kept the movie alive. I enjoyed getting to know his character, plus was intrigued about how Jackie would interact with him. We see her pick up things off the street that could be dangerous, like rocks and glass, whenever she goes around him. But is he dangerous? We don't really know because we don't know how he killed her family. This is played up with the anxious feeling we get whenever she goes to the Red Road apartments. First she meets Stevie and April who live with Clyde. Stevie was also in prison. We assume this because earlier in the film she says that people who live in Red Road were typically ex-convicts. So when Stevie says go to the window and feel the breeze, we feel a little scared of what he's about to do. The problem for me is that I never felt like I got to know Jackie. I never understood why she was making all of these decisions. Even in the end when she says that the last thing she said to her daughter was something angry and mean, then Clyde killed them while driving on crack, I still didn't get it. Why did Jackie hang around everyone so much? I know she's angry that he got out early just because of one line said earlier, then her sex drive is thrown off and can't secretly bang the one guy anymore. Her stalking became kind of a movie thing. I didn't really believe what was going on. I especially didn't believe her having sex with Clyde no matter what. Was that really her plan? To convict him of rape? And why did everyone believe her, considering this was the guy that killed her family? Even the guy at the police department talked to her about him earlier. I felt like this film took sex too lightly. What would have been more interesting is seeing Jackie cry as Clyde has sex with her. But instead there was pleasure, which I'm sure is supposed to be some kind of statement, but again I'm having problems believing any of it. And nothing really seemed to make me believe that she would have let Clyde back out. After seeing it I realized she probably did this because his daughter came by, but I don't think that would cause a change of heart. At least while watching it nothing clicked there for me. I guess I was just waiting for something to blow me away since information was kept away for so long, but the information held was something that has been done in films plenty of times. An example of this story that comes to the top of my mind is Signs, where the man can't forgive the one who killed his wife. I understand they are both done in completely different ways for a reason, but the regret on both sides is something seen in plenty of other films. If you're going to be secretive then give us something that's not cliche. Perhaps my problem is I'm not a big fan of films that just try to lead up to one big surprise anyway. I like when Hitchcock would do it because he would hold information until the first half was over then the next half would be all about what comes from the reveal. I also didn't quite understand why Arnold felt it important to have unsimulated sex for the scene between Clyde and Jackie. What I think this film would have benefited from was someone to look over the script as a story with real characters and not just an exercise of style and unique storytelling.

Sam M (de) wrote: oneof the best comedy sequels on earth a must see film

Gema R (es) wrote: Promising sci-fi thriller, lacking more interesting stories besides the main characters

Charles P (nl) wrote: This is a vision of the future of Canada if the NDP wins tonight.

Jacob F (us) wrote: A funny, and bittersweet look at the lives of a group of 1960's high school graduates. With with a timeless message, and entertaining characters.

Greg W (ca) wrote: another fave seventies movie where images and music blend so well

Clay B (fr) wrote: PORK CHOP HILL (1959)

Sarah P (gb) wrote: Wow...not sure what to say.

Darius G (nl) wrote: Amazing movie, not only the production value is something I wouldn't expect out of a movie from my country but also the writing is great. It's funny, action packed and never gets boring.

Leonardo Malacay S (br) wrote: Esto hubiera estado bien para el teatro pero como pelcula zzzzzz

Lesline D (ca) wrote: one of my favourite movies!

Dan H (nl) wrote: Good action, worth watching. Not as good as Olympus has fallen.

Keating T (ca) wrote: Somewhat brutally honest at times, Smooth Talk is about a sixteen year old girl who is falling in love with older boys, while falling out of love with her family. The film depicts a strained mother-daughter relationship; I have two sister, and this film gets it spot on. There is a a dark side to these boys that you are made aware of in the first scene, subtle at times but when you realize it, you can't help getting creeped-out.

Bill T (de) wrote: Incredibly enjoyable (and incredibly violent!) romp with Henry Rollins starring as Jack, a man with more than a few secrets. We don't find out right away, but at the movie progresses, we find out more about his weird and gross habits. Further Revelations of the plot and its secrets would just spoil the movie for you. This movie was fun, original, gory, and a helluva lot of fun. One of the best movies I've seen this year.