Neena, in the company of her mom, and several female friends, travels to a remote holiday spot, and stay overnight at a lodge. A young man named Kumar also attends at this lodge, claiming to be the owner, and asking the caretaker, Shyam, to get rid of the intruders. Shyam assures Kumar that he will do so immediately. Instead of asking them to leave, he tells the visitors that Kumar is mentally unstable, and believes that he owns this lodge. After several misunderstandings, Kumar and Neena fall in love, and want to get married. And it is then Neena and her mother are come across photographs of Kumar and a young woman named Kamo alias Kamini, in very intimate positions.
Neena, in the company of her mom, and several female friends, travels to a remote holiday spot, and stay overnight at a lodge. A young man named Kumar also attends at this lodge, claiming ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Melanie G (it) wrote: Typical rom com.... kind of slow and awkward at some parts.
Don S (mx) wrote: Completely unbelievable, but it is not meant to high art, just enjoyable family fun. The puppies are cute as always, the story is far out, and the entertainment value is decent. The child actors can't act, the adults do fair jobs and the CGI is on the poorer side. Still, it is what it is and accomplishes what it sets out to do.
Amanda W (fr) wrote: Different/Weird/Strange/Not Bad/Kinda Liked...
mirabella 1 (mx) wrote: L'ANATOMIE DE L'ENFER (2004)Directed by Catherine Breillat.
Johan B (nl) wrote: Straffe film. Het thema van de magdelena sisters met de kwaadheid van the name of the father. Harde film, de geestelijken komen er niet goed uit.
Samitha G (jp) wrote: Not bad to watch, but nothing new...
Natalie (ru) wrote: I loved this movie, it was weird....
David S (br) wrote: Another noir-ish tale from the criminally underrated John Dahl, though admittedly this is his weakest film. The movie definitely has an interesting story concept (see the memories of a murder victim to uncover her killer) but its just not as convincing as it should be in presenting this idea. The film does have interesting twists (as all Dahl's films do) but the film simply isn't as tight or focused as his other films, with too many ideas thrown in that are not tied together. Still, not a total loss as Liotta gives a fine performance and it never really is dull... though it never really makes complete sense either.
Phil H (br) wrote: Odd combination of Jeff Goldblum, a depressed insomniac whose life is dull, uneventful and his wife is cheating on him, the other person being Michelle Pfeiffer who is a jewel smuggler and has some Iranians after her for some precious stones. The mismatched pair bump into each other, make friends and have to run from the nasty Iranians which leads to all manner of scrapes and tight situations none of which are particularly exciting or original.The film is really quite dull much like Goldblum's performance and doesn't offer anything other than an impressive list of cameos, why? beats me. Pfeiffer and Goldblum don't blend a tall, the action is weak, its naturally very very dated and director Landis is one of the Iranian agents in (I think) his only full movie role.
Al S (gb) wrote: A riveting, dark and gritty action-packed edge of your seat thriller. It packs real serious punch and showcases Dirty Harry at his toughest and most bad-ass. Clint Eastwood is leaner and tougher than ever as Dirty Harry, giving a terrific performance and this time in the directors chair showing off his craft and style. Sondra Locke gives an intense and effective performance. It`s definitely the darkest film in the series and showing that its not afraid to take risk. It`s packed with dark humor, great performances and sizzling action sequences.
Aj V (jp) wrote: Not a bad movie, but it's really just another romantic comedy, which just happens to be set in Italy. It has it's moments, but overall it's not a great movie.
Susan W (br) wrote: Awesome movie!! has you laughing and crying.
Joanne N (ru) wrote: Saw this on the airplane. Twice. Read the book a few years ago. Can't believe the mediocre results given to the movie. It was SO GOOD! I loved the actress who played the little girl, and of course Geoffrey Rush.
Bertrand M (fr) wrote: suite de Smoke totalement improvis. Ils se sont tellement clats sur le premier qu'ils l'ont tourn en quinze jours pour le plaisir en invitant des potes new yorkais qui se nomment Lou Reed ou Jarmusch (excusez du peu). EXcellent.