"Night Editor" was based on the already existing radio program in which a newspaper editor would recount the 'inside story' of some bit newspaper story, and later became a television series... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
"Night Editor" was based on the already existing radio program in which a newspaper editor would recount the 'inside story' of some bit newspaper story, and later became a television series.
You may also like
Night Editor torrent reviews
Draco I (kr) wrote: Si es bastante malona, jaja. Me la esperaba mejor hecha, algo tipo "The Killer Inside Me" pero no... es una pelcula de 'Serie B' de esas que parecen que las hizo un estudiante que apenas sabe como prender la cmara. Del guin y las actuaciones, ni hablamos. Le pondr una estrellita y media solo porque la sangre se ve chida y el planteamiento tiene dos tres cosillas interesantes aunque nunca cuaja.
Joshua L (jp) wrote: Sexploitation cult flick that's dull, sleazy and violent. Seems like a B-film despite given the A-film big budget treatment.
Wesley J (ca) wrote: Campy? yes. Classic? YES! To fully appreciate this film you must see at least five episodes of the old daytime series Dark Shadows. You will notice how Dan Curtis really elevated the horror factor and how his directing of the film really gives it an atmosphere that is just plain absent in the TV series. Excellent job by Curtis as well as by Fridd as Barnabas the vampire. Some of the actors don't perform as well as the others, but don't let that get in the way of this classic. I cannot believe that this is unavailable on DVD. How is that? You can buy 'The Giant Gila Monster" but you can't buy 'House of Dark Shadows'? What are they thinking?
Adam P (de) wrote: The writing in this film (thanks to its novelist screenwriter) is surprisingly zesty and clever. The characters (save for some overacting children) seem real and it is easy to care for their plight. I wouldn't say the plot is entirely gripping and it bordered at times on pure propaganda. Bette Davis is the big name but she doesn't play an enormous part, merely fleshes out an excellent ensemble cast. Released in the same year as Casablanca, 1943 was obviously a dark year at the movies where the good vs evil cliche actually took on some realistic and topical meaning.
Tanner B (kr) wrote: good thriller, and all around fun.
Jarkko H (gb) wrote: Star Wars Saga's absurd order of the first, but in chronological order, the fourth part does not reach the level of the previous films, but the quality remains (at least in my opinion) the positive side. In this work on the Star Wars films most humorous point of view, but, fortunately, it works just fine.The characters are once again strange, but the overall appearance is somewhat humorous, but it does not handicap much. Such orcs Viewing brings to mind a little bit hilarious opinions. Jar Jar Binks is still in the midst of these humorous creatures serious problem. Not that kind of foolish face and slurred and the yokel countries can not stand anyone, even if such a batty fool fell Viewing and misfortune seems a little funny. Nonetheless, quite reasonably good plot can catch up, and that's it time to pass, when only the opinion attached to the story of the new stuff (racing events), and, of course, good old-fashioned lightsaber battles.