Nine To Five
Frank Hart is a pig. He takes advantage in the grossest manner of the women who work with him. When his three assistants manage to trap him in his own house they assume control of his department and productivity leaps, but just how long can they keep Hart tied up?
- Stars:Jane Fonda, Lily Tomlin, Dolly Parton, Dabney Coleman, Sterling Hayden, Elizabeth Wilson, Henry Jones, Lawrence Pressman, Marian Mercer, Renn Woods, Norma Donaldson, Roxanna Bonilla-Giannini, Peggy Pope, Richard Stahl, Ray Vitte, Colin Higgins,
- Director:Colin Higgins,
- Writer:Patricia Resnick (story), Colin Higgins (screenplay), Patricia Resnick (screenplay)
Sakuraba Junko, a 29-year-old single English always dreams to work in New York. In the funeral of an acquaintance, Junko has committed a mistake made herself very ashamed with the monk Takane Hoshikawa. Accidentally, they meet each other again in a blind date. And the two fall in a sweet love. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Nine To Five torrent reviews
(de) wrote: a crass blass from the pass.
(it) wrote: The ending made absolutely no sense. The beginning segment was the best part and honestly would have been better as a short film not an hour and a half film because it got stupid in the middle.
(us) wrote: It is a terrifying and emotionally harrowing story, given depth by superb performances. It pays more than a lip-service to put a spotlight on a thin line between following your conscience or keeping your loved ones ... an idea that has a compelling and unapologetic moral seriousness. I'm craving for more moral redemption!
(gb) wrote: A typical love story, the guy loves the girl, the girl plays hard to get, soon they fall in love, get married and then find out that marriage is all bad. and in the end, everyone lives happily ever after.I don't really like this movie. But AR Rehman's music, is [as usual] awesome! Vivek and Rani don't make a good couple.And Of course I loved the way Shahrukh suddenly popped up at the end. It was pretty LOL.
(nl) wrote: A Touchstone classic. Sister Act is a riot! (First full viewing - In my early twenties)
(ru) wrote: Norris did the fight choreographic, but that wouldn't help for this movie.
(au) wrote: This is the first and best of Sergio Sollima's three spaghetti westerns. It's also the first film to feature Tomas Milian and the first where Lee Van Cleef is the leading hero of the story.Cleef plays a bounty hunter, Jonathan Corbett, who has been employed to track down Cuchillo Sanchez (Milian) for the rape and murder of a 12-year-old girl. Corbett spends the whole second act in a cat and mouse chase after Cuchillo. The wile Cuchillo manages to escape Corbett over and over, always leaving the bounty hunter in a worse off predicament. It's during this manhunt that Corbett's opinion of Cuchillo begins to change. These characters and their arcs are some of the most intriguing you'll find in any spaghetti.But the most famous aspect of The Big Gundown is the Big Gundown. Sollima gives us one of the best mexican standoff moments in the history of western cinema. Watch and you'll learn that for some it's not always bad to bring a knife to a gunfight.And I can't forget to mention Ennio Morricone's score. As you would expect, it is totally awesome. Morricone seems to always attach himself to the very best western films. And The Big Gundown is definitely one of the greatest.
(kr) wrote: Solid revenge drama with a good performance in the lead by Robert Preston.
(gb) wrote: The movie give scare, give emotion, give many scare feelings and the best thing is the incredible produced effects....a good movie !!
(mx) wrote: I can clearly remember growing up in high school when this movie was all the rage. Everyone was talking about it and quoting it left and right. I'll also admit I found it fairly entertaining, and that's why after years of not seeing it, I wanted to check it out again. Boy has this thing not aged well. The film's premise is still sound and some of the characters still feel fun, but most of the jokes and gags really don't work for me anymore. Now some do, but I found myself rolling my eyes more often than laughing, which for a comedy is a real problem. The only thing I could think of after the fact, was did I really find it that funny all those years ago, or did I think I liked it because most of my peers did, and there for I was supposed to like it? If for nothing else raising the question of such ideas of how film is influenced by peers, social groups, and a collective the film was worth the re-watch. But not for Ben Stiller's scene chewing, defiantly not for that.