Orphans of the Storm

Orphans of the Storm

Henriette and Louise, a foundling, are raised together as sisters. When Louise goes blind, Henriette swears to take care of her forever. They go to Paris to see if Louise's blindness can be cured, but are separated when an aristocrat lusts after Henriette and abducts her. Only Chevalier de Vaudrey is kind to her, and they fall in love. The French Revolution replaces the corrupt Aristocracy with the equally corrupt Robespierre. De Vaudrey, who has always been good to peasants, is condemned to death for being an aristocrat, and Henriette for harboring him. Will revolutionary hero Danton, the only voice for mercy in the new regime, be able to save them from the guillotine?

Two orphaned sisters are caught up in the turmoil of the French Revolution, encountering misery and love along the way. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Orphans of the Storm torrent reviews

Justin S (it) wrote: Enjoyable, but not great. It was too much action and too little story. The voice acting was all good, and the animation was mostly up to par. I watched it with my kids. They all enjoyed it. I did too. It just left me wishing for a meatier story in light of such amazing source material.

intuciic (ag) wrote: nice romantic movie with quite common story

Paul B (fr) wrote: A thrilling concept and an excellent cast curiously adds up to nothing at all. Pirate Radio doesn't contain any insight into the true events that took place, and it fails to entertain with hardly a laugh anywhere in sight.

Dorian J (ag) wrote: Compelling film! I thought that J.P. Davis was very convincing. Eddie Jones was fantastic as usual. I thought that this film has some classic line, however I didn't really feel the chemistry between Jones and Davis which in turn made the the parts of the film seem fictious. But other than that this was a good film.

Ethan H (ca) wrote: Good directing but a hollow story.

Freeman M (jp) wrote: Cliched. Boring. Forgettable.

Tim W (nl) wrote: Not as good as the previous (again), but still enjoyable. Missing its original charm though, and seems a bit recycled. Also goofier and cuter than previous, which I can;t fault it for cuz I liked it. The story wasn't any worse. The cliches were becoming more numerous though. 6.5/10

bill s (it) wrote: Bland,boring thriller that's wildly miscast.

Darryl S (us) wrote: Spectacular and stunning! Everything about this art-film is impeccable and eye-popping! One of my top-10 all-time favorites.

Jacob A (gb) wrote: Spader and Downey are I e of the greatest on screen duo I've ever seen. The way they bounce off of each other is phenomenal.

Raanan E (us) wrote: A good watch, not only for the humor value

Yash B (mx) wrote: A tad boring, but still a watchable disney classic. I think it's a bit dated but it's still a moving story that resonates today. It's not among my favorites but it is worth a watch.

Akshay M (au) wrote: It isn't about Love everytime in a relationship, it's more about understanding each others feelings and trusting each other. Simply loved Closer, smart direction by Mike Nichols and lovely screenplay makes it a perfect romantic drama. Natalie Portman and Clive Owen completely overshadows Jude law and Julia Roberts with truly committed performance.

Scott B (br) wrote: Enough to keep you watching, but I can't recommend it.

Salim I (kr) wrote: I liked it, it was ok.

Euge F (br) wrote: There were many things that bothered me in this movie. These were...TRAMA: the plot of the movie was not interesting and you reached a moment in which you don't care about the characters anymore and you get bored. While I was watching it I just hoped I hadn't invite my whole family to watch it with me.CHARACTERS: Jasmine's personality is, in this movie, very different as it was in Aladdin. It seems as if she was five again... were has all her maturity go? Same with Aladdin. Genie was yet a little funny but not as in the first one.MUSIC: Aladdin's music is unforgettable and that's why its soundtrack is so famous. But in this movie the music is not good at all and is easily forgettable.ANIMATION: its quality was really poor, nothing to do with the classic.Well, that's pretty much all. I do not reccomend you to watch it, as it is a pointless and dissapointing to such a classic like Aladdin. At least don't invite anyone to watch it with you.

Alan M (ca) wrote: As beutiful a film as it is harrowing set in backdrop of 80's Glasgow and the choas of war torn Nicaragua. In a similer vain to Loach's Land And Freedom this is bleak in parts but a well recommened love story with some solid lead performances especially from Oyanka Cabezas and Robert Carlyle.

Westleigh Q (au) wrote: This might be a half-decent movie if any of it made sense.