Policajac sa Petlovog brda

Policajac sa Petlovog brda

The adventures of a skillful Belgrade policeman who proves to be equally successful as a caring father.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:91 minutes
  • Release:1992
  • Language:Serbian
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:masturbation,  

The adventures of a skillful Belgrade policeman who proves to be equally successful as a caring father. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Policajac sa Petlovog brda torrent reviews

Brandon O (de) wrote: /10Acting - 8.5Writing - 9Dialogue - 9.5Plot & Characterization - 9.5Cinematography & Editing - 9Soundtrack/Score & Set Design - 8How much I enjoyed it personally - 8.5

Kellie G (br) wrote: Not sure if the bad acting is done on purpose or it's just bad, but the actual movie isn't too bad. A bit silly but entertaining.

Manny C (us) wrote: If you loved Jack Black in School of Rock, you'll love the real thing just as much. Meet Paul Green, who runs the Paul Green School of Rock Music in Philadelphia. In this amazing doc from director Don Argett, Green is seen preaching the gospel of rock and roll goodness to student who vary from age nine to seventeen. Green is a self-avowed Zappa fanatic who brings his best students with him to Germany to compete in the annual Zappanale. It's riveting.

Andrew L (nl) wrote: When the ass kicking begins this is a joy to watch. Gets better with every viewing

Gina E (it) wrote: About my favorite time period in history. Martelli is really amazing and will be one to watch in the future.

Raghad H (kr) wrote: It Is Movie Based On "Tuesdays With Morrie" Book.. For Mitch AlbomIt Is Really Nice Movie.. Non-Fiction

Morgan R (au) wrote: Joshua Logan, directed this screenplay based on a play written by William Inge, which he also directed. The 1953 Broadway production debuted Paul Newman, who played Hal, the part William Holden plays in the movie. You could tell the movie was based on a play by Holden's over acting. His performance was geared for a playgoing audience not a theatre going audience. Overacting, with robust body movement made Holden look out of place. I blame Logan for this direction as Holden has done much better in other movies. Rosalind Russell, who was primarily a Broadway actor, was outstanding in this movie, especially in the second half. If you watch her and Arthur Kennedy's scenes against Holden and Novak's scenes the difference in talent is striking and should have been embarrassing to Holden and Novak. One of Kim Novak's lines in the movie is: "I just get so tired of being told I'm pretty." Well, girlie that's the only thing you had going for you in this movie and your career. "Picnic" was not a good movie. It did pick up in the second half, but very few movie productions based on plays are successful. A movie production requires different skill sets for the director and the cast.

Christopher C (us) wrote: Released in 1982 in a 5-hour version for Swedish television and cut to 180 minutes for theatrical release, FANNY AND ALEXANDER was meant to be Ingmar Bergman's last film. Though the great auteur lived on another 25 years and even wrote and directed some smaller projects, FANNY AND ALEXANDER can still be seen as a great capstone to decades of legendary cinema. (The best way to see it is in Criterion's 5 DVD set, which has both the television and theatrical versions, as well as two DVDs of "making of" and other commentary).FANNY AND ALEXANDER deals with the great two preoccupations of Bergman's career, namely the absence of God and the unbridgeable gaps between human beings, but the result is wonderfully life-affirming. Fanny and Alexander are the children of Oscar and Emilie Ekdahl, actors in Uppsala circa 1907, but the film gives a panorama of the extended Ekdahl family, presided over by grandmother Helena, uncles Gustav Adolf (a restauranteur and the film's most comedic presence) and Carl (a professor who has fallen into debt and is trapped in a loveless marriage), their wives and children, and the selfless Jewish shopkeeper Isak Jacobi. This Swedish family lives in an Old World opulence that is hard to believe for audiences today, especially for a country whose class system by and large disappeared after the war. The rigid interaction among people not closely acquainted and the deference of servants to their employers make for gestures as alien to us 21st century viewers as a Noh play.In a way, FANNY AND ALEXANDER is like those big novels of a century ago, by Tolstoy or Galsworthy, dealing with the vicissitudes of a whole family. The vaster family drama, however, is only a backdrop to a more personal one: Fanny and Alexander are soon orphaned, and their widowed mother eventually remarries, this time with a cruel clergyman. The children move from the freedom and comfort of the Ekdahl home to the austere bishop's place, where the children are punished for the slightest infraction by beatings or being locked up in the attic. The Ekdahls' torment living under the bishop is the great crisis of the film, and their unexpected liberation from it presents Alexander with a burden that he will carry into his budding manhood.The original television version is the way to see Bergman's final masterpiece. Don't be daunted by the length: 5 hours should not be a problem in an age when people will watch an entire season of a sitcom on DVD in one sitting. FANNY AND ALEXANDER is not slow, meditative cinema like, say, Andrei Tarkovsky or Bla Tarr, but rather Bergman is always presenting the viewer with some engaging drama. The theatrical cut, which Bergman made only with the greatest regret, is a very different (and much weaker film), cutting out much of the film's magical realism, the touching meditations on growing old represented by the character of the grandmother, and some vivid depictions of early 20th-century Sweden.

Daniel C (fr) wrote: It actually had a decent climax. Tough to sit through until then....

Jack G (kr) wrote: this is how the genre should be done, in general from France in the 60s

Stephanie F (nl) wrote: This movie has many problems: lame plot; some lame Berlin songs (some are good) and it is apparently set in some alternate world where Bing > Fred. I, for one, am very grateful not to live in that world because it seems awful.


Phil H (ru) wrote: Two major Hollywood tough guy legends team together for this 30's period set comedy/crime thriller which doesn't quite get there.Its basically an buddy action flick but for some reason they have forgotten to include some action haha there is allot of dialog and its all pretty dull, everything looks damn fine to be truthful though. All the sets, costumes and cars look really nice and compete easily with say...'The Untouchables' but as usual Eastwood plays his usual cliched tough guy with no rules whilst Reynolds fairs better with some reasonable laughs as the smooth talking danger magnet who is also handy with his dukes.Bit of a flop when released and I can see why as this really does stand out as a missed chance for a good film, the blend does work almost but its just lacking some originality and punch.