Redemption Road

Redemption Road

Two men embark on a music-steeped journey through the American South.

Two men embark on a music-steeped journey through the American South. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Redemption Road torrent reviews

D M (ru) wrote: Nerdy super-cute girl (Maria Thayer) wakes up after a one-night stand to find the zombie apocalypse has started. She partners up with her reluctant fling only to learn he is closer to the source of the problem than they realized as his father (Ray Wise) is responsible. Top-notch zomromcom.

Jay P (gb) wrote: These guys are living on a different planet. Enjoying watch but quite heavy on the weirdness between Pete and Carl.

Jonathan S (kr) wrote: A well-done film with an interesting look into an oppressive society.

Mildreth A (es) wrote: Gregg Is Freaken SEXY! ;D

Andy C (it) wrote: was an exceptional movie an incredible story. The Mr.Schnabel should take a bow because i feel that this was better than The Diving Bell... It is unfortunate that the story is all to common. Perhaps this will give some insight into how desperation can motivate anybody to do anything

Fred V (mx) wrote: Eurotrip is quite lame, but to its credit, its definately highly entertaining and well-presented with a likeable cast and grrreat cameo's of superactors. Its full of European inaccuraties, but of course its not about that, its about the ride. the robot joke, the creepy Italian lick-his-face, the brother and sister makeout scene, the Eastern European debauchery, 'Scotty doesn't know', all excellently done. I like this movie!

John W (mx) wrote: Not quite what I expected. Beautifully shot and well-acted.

Paul D (au) wrote: As a television movie the next installment of the famous horror immediately suffers in terms of style even before the poor story reveals itself which is a rehash of the previous films. There are nuances from the other franchises that give it some relevance as a sequel but there's little Devilish stimulation here.

D M (us) wrote: A scientist dies in a lab accident. His brain and other parts are preserved and kept alive in the lab long after his funeral. His remains are used to test what the other scients have been working on, a super-strength cyborg. The cyborg gets hella pissed when it touches anyone, for some strange reason. More of a revenge-horror film with a facade of a Frankenstein-type theme (fyi, it was originally known as Frankenstein 88 and later in some countries as Frankenstein 2000 [the D'Amato movie released in the US under that name has no relation]), it appears to have been marketed as a Terminator rip-off. It may also be seen a loose blue-print for Robocop and also has aspects remnicent of the earlier Swamp Thing and the later Darkman. Some gruesome stuff is shown, but his voice is damn annoying and the pacing sucked. (As an aside, for some strange reason I have seen this credited as being from any of the years 1983-86, but my VHS case says 1984.)

Phil H (jp) wrote: Directed by Richard 'Lethal Weapon' Donner but looking more like an epic Ridley Scott picture. This is a curious tale of love and romance tied in with a typical medieval/dark ages animal based curse. A form of witchcraft cast upon two young lovers by a man of the cloth, a Bishop, simply out of jealousy. A Romeo and Juliet style historical fable.First thing that will hit you with this film are the striking visuals. The story is set in central Italy (I presume) and there is a very real historical grandiose feel to everything you see. All the scenes are set within (or around) real locations, real castles, real towns, real ruins, real old courtyards etc...The visuals are HIGHLY stylised believe me! every shot is incredibly slick and glossy looking, one could coin the term 'historical scenery porn'. Everything looks like a beautiful living water colour painting with stunning sunsets, dawns, dusk's and twilight's set against some jaw-droppingly lush European countryside and rustic ruins villages and fortresses.Admittedly the one draw back about the visuals are they look too clean, almost too good!. I know this is a fairytale of sorts, a fantasy, but there doesn't really appear to be any dirt or mud anywhere hehe. All the buildings are spotless, the countryside is perfect, every character is dressed immaculately in clean attire, the horses have gleaming coats etc...It all has a lovely dream-like quality but I just felt for the period some grubbiness was required.The other main thing that will hit you is the strange choice in musical score. I'm sure most would think an orchestral score would be fitting for such material, but no, Donner goes down the 'Tangerine Dream/Legend' route with an 80's electronic rock based set of tracks. There are of course some more traditional tit bits in there but most action and fantasy moments are accompanied by this odd rock score. The problem is the visuals and general style in this film are so good and authentic the score just doesn't sit right in my opinion, it feels a bit cheesy and ruins the classical approach. I'm guessing the film 'First Knight' may have pinched this idea, thing is that film didn't have the spectacularly lavish locations, good cast, slick camera work, timeless story...OK that film was just crap.I think this film also has some great casting. Both Hauer and Pfeiffer really do look stunning with their big blue eyes, makes one feel quite ordinary and pathetic. Hauer really is the true knight in shining armour here, the real Prince Charming...OK maybe not in shining armour but instead uber cool pitch black...errr armour/Jedi robes kinda thing. Typical heroic attire with a sweeping black cape with posh red lining, this guy looks quite wealthy. With his blonde hair, blue eyes and atop his black steed he really does look very handsome, first time in awhile I can genuinely honestly feel comfortable saying a bloke looked attractive, I was envious.On the other hand Pfeiffer has this ethereal-like beauty with her lovely short blonde locks, pale skin, strong facial structure and yet more big blue eyes. She truly looks angelic, the perfect Princess or damsel in distress for Hauer's brave knight, together they really are a perfect match and I really could believe the fact they turn into a wolf and hawk at their respective times (Ladyhawke...speaks for itself right). Unfortunately the film is let down by the one casting of Broderick who is a stain upon this gorgeous film. He is truly annoying with his constant nervous ramblings in that squeaky voice of his. I just wanted to slap him across the face every time he made those idiotic expressions of shock or surprise...good God!.The plot does take a bit of getting used too, Hauer as a wolf by night and Pfeiffer as a hawk by day, it also takes time to explain this which is a bit confusing. There are no horrific mutations or transformations though, its all done with subtle fades and nice eye close ups which works well. Overall I did get the impression the plot was stretched out a bit because there wasn't much to actually do, the aim of the game for Hauer is kill the Bishop who cursed them. Not much more to it than that so I think there is filler or padding here and there, it can feel dull in places. You could say its all style over substance I guess, but that would be harsh methinks.Overall the film looks exquisite and is very realistic to reality, even if it is too clean to actually be reality. Everything and especially Hauer and Pfeiffer are period perfect, the pair look like characters from a classical fresco or mural come to life. You'd never guess this was a Richard Donner flick.

Diwas K (ru) wrote: strange cinematography - all the heads are chopped off.

Jon A (br) wrote: Guinness is in typically good form and Bogarde plays the soft-spoken bastard exceptionally well. Good support too from reliable British character actors like Anthony Quayle and Nigel Stock.

craig m (kr) wrote: its a good and adds a interesting twist at the end