Rude Awakening

Rude Awakening

In the later 1960s, two hippies are forced to leave their friends as they are wanted by the FBI, who sees them as criminals. They hide in the jungle for 20 years, secluded from the outside world. In the later 1980s, the find out that a secret war is about to start in the US, and decide to return to New York to tell someone about it.

In the 1960s, two hippies go off into the jungle to evade the FBI. When they come back to New York in the 1980s, their fellow hippie friends have become rich yuppies. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Rude Awakening torrent reviews

Kevin R (es) wrote: Highly trained modern idiots.Rusty is a Knight that enters a competition to hopefully one day have a castle and get knighted. He accomplishes his goal but eventually messes up and losses his rank and status. He is shunned and told to regain his status he needs to slay a dragon (he happens to have a dragon as a best friend). Can Rusty find a way to be a knight again?"Do I have no competent knights?"Thomas Rodenstein, director of Moonbeam Bear and His Friends, delivers Knight Rusty. The storyline for this picture is pretty miserable and unimaginative. The dialogue is also poorly written; which is too bad, because the animation was awesome."Let's burn metal."I grabbed this from Netflix to watch with my daughter. We watched it together as a family and my daughter found it entertaining and enjoyable. We felt this was very straightforward and unimaginative. I adored the animation in this which was very creative and unique. I only recommend seeing this if nothing better is available. "You already have a knight...in armor anyway."Grade: D

Mago B (mx) wrote: Contamos con una historia asquerosamente simple que es estirada como una liga elstica hasta casi romperse, lo que la hace increblemente lenta, carente de dinmica y estpida conforme ms avanza. El guionista recurre a chistes sin gracia e inspidos y al reciclaje de situaciones de la pelcula pasada, solo que ahora estas situaciones resultan incoloras y sin vida como las bromas. Los dilogos son sosos y tontos, el final se reduce a un deus ex machina descarado y para colmo de males anticlimtico gracias a la psima animacin. Por cierto, pueden ver el ttulo? Pues saben, para ser un especial de navidad es un tema que ni siquiera tocan en realidad, es ms, los protagonistas se acuerdan de l ya faltando 5 minutos para que todo acabe. Esto es el resultado de un estudio pattico, que por un modesto xito ya quiere tirar la casa por la ventana y exprimir hasta donde ms puede una historia que, tras culminar con la primera entrega nos damos cuenta que no daba para ms. Al parecer piensan hacer ms entregas de esto, qu bien por ellos, que lo disfruten, porque yo me rehso a seguir consumiendo ms de su pozo, aquel que se sec hace tiempo y que lo mximo que puede entregar no es ms que arena seca.

Aaron M (it) wrote: This rags to riches story is an amicable one even for a non musical lover like myself however I have seen the west end show which is much better than this retelling. The fact of the matter is, the movie gives very little more than the theatre production, instead the level of acting from the Four Season actors themselves feels amateurish and scenes with music are actually shortened and feel more like an afterthought. It follows the musical closely right down to the script, but mixing the layout up a bit which isn't really for the better either. Its a decent watch nonetheless and would be much better if you haven't endured the film in another form yet Eastwood has put in little effort with this one.

Hayley M (ca) wrote: Seems like they just put this movie together to make money and that was it. Predictable story line and definitely no way near as compelling as the last installments. A disappointment, don't see it.

Derek W (us) wrote: Sloppily made and scatter-brained but redeeming itself with Mike Myer's delightfully cheesy and hilarious performances as Powers, Evil, and the titular Goldmember.

TheScarlatescu R (ca) wrote: the movie is so bad for so many reasons, the kitch that was the 90s refering to style, the weak storyline and overacting, but I am ashamed to admit I loved the 90s and I did enjoy the moviePS and for some reason it reminded me of Bad Boys 1995

Martin K (it) wrote: Jeg kan huske, at jeg tilfldigvis s Style Wars p tysk fjernsyn en aften. Jeg mener at jeg var 14-15 r , og jeg (og min bror) var SOLGT p stedet. Selv med drlig tysk tale, er den bare s fuld af kraft!

bobby u (de) wrote: B- What happens when the doormat of the world gains control over a horde of rats? Revenge is Sweet! watching crispin glover and the rats is entertaining.

Matthew W (au) wrote: Sylvester Stallone at his finest. What a great movie. Its a survivalist fans dream movie

Norberto A (ru) wrote: Hitchcock' was a wonderful experience that I didnt want it to end! Anthony Hopkins and Helen Mirren were astonishing as the married filmmaking duo dealing with their relationship becoming rocky during the difficult process of making the film 'Psycho'! All performances are solid.The film puts you under its spell and its fascinating to see the struggles and negativity Hitchcock had to face in order to make a film he believed in and was passionate about. To see his private life behind the scenes and his relationship with his supporting wife Alma was intrigiung.The film was also hilarious! I found myself laughing and smiling more than anything, but there are dark,eerie moments when the infamous Ed Gein story is channeled in to the film! I only wish James D'Arcy as Anthony Perkins who played Norman Bates had a bigger role!He was dead-on as Perkins!!! Also, I feel the film deserved to be much longer as I frowned when the end credits appeared!

Mark W (fr) wrote: There's nothing earth shattering about "Cleaner" but it does include a star-studded cast, all of whom deliver solid performances within a story that is partially original. This movie is a good watch but could have been better.