. You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Sabina torrent reviews

Tea R (mx) wrote: Kako sam bila jako umorna, film sam gledala s ocima na pola koplja. Nisam se mogla koncentrirati na njega, neovisno o napetoj radnji i triler zanru. Dajem mu prosjecnu ocjenu jer nit smrdi nit mirise. Od pocetka do kraja se lagano vuce neka napeta radnjica, ali opet nije nista novo ili spektakularno.

Benedict R (jp) wrote: Basement was truly the worst film I have ever seen. I didnt expect much from a Danny Dyer film, but I didnt expect to want to give it 0 out of 5. Firstly the story/plot was non-existant and didnt even make sense. I literally do not understand what the conclusion of the film was, and why any of what happened, actually happened. Second the script was appalling. The "Actors" just came out with random lines with no relevance to what was going on, and the proceeded to run around a bit more. And Finally the acting was abismal. We all know Dyer cannot act, but apparantly neither can Mistry or anyone else in the film. The film was a waste of time and money, both to those who made it, and those who had to sit through it which wasnt even rewarded at the end.

Barney o (it) wrote: WHAT I LIKED: This is an odd mix of the amazing and the awkward, but mainly Iron Man 3 is full of the character stuff that makes Marvel films so great. Forget the rubbish of Iron Man 2, Tony Stark is developed perfectly and we really feel like we know him here. This is largely thanks to Robert Downey Jr being stripped back to basics, but it's also thanks to Shane Black's distinct style, humour and charm.WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: There are sadly a few things that you really can't ignore. I don't normally get hung up on plot if the thing flows; but hugely glaring holes and a baffling villain do sometimes make for one hell of a confusing narrative experience.VERDICT: Iron Man 3 is arguably the best film in the Iron Man franchise. It's darker than the first, but still a whole lot of fun.

Gregory W (ca) wrote: great casting gives this quiet little indie the fuel to go and go it does.

Eric H (ru) wrote: NIGHT CATCHES US is a gripping film that reminds us of the importance of the Black Panther Movement. Historical distance and changes in this country may have numbed the memory of a social movement as an important racial equality step and the very words 'Black Panther' are unfortunately tainted with the radical ugly aspects. All I know is this is a terrific movie and a must see

Asif K (es) wrote: just watch it for the chemistry , bizzare cliche .... all that kismat and naseeb was over done, should have been much better.

Aeem A (au) wrote: A must see film which will take you by surprise. Mostly Pakistani cast but with Kiron Kher as one of the main characters. Good acting with a very good story line. It shows the fall out after the partition and how peoples lives are changed depedning on which side of the border they end up at. Enjoy the movie.

Molly R (jp) wrote: This story kept me interested and the performances are great. I'm surprised critics didn't like it more.

Brendan N (jp) wrote: Dudikoff returns with a sequel that bears little resemblance to the original. The beach scene was humorous which takes any seriousness away from a film that is so bent on seriousness. The overall scientific plot is absurd and the kidnapping of soldiers is laughable. The film doesn't quite have the energy to keep the plot line moving and the acting hasn't improved. The series continues a downward spiral from here which is a shame because as kids we all loved the series. I had to track this series down which I'm sadly beginning to regret. Cannon really didn't make a lot of great films but at least they made films for the audience.

Hllywood (br) wrote: Love this movie! Matt you rock abs! LOL!

Tim C (br) wrote: The Kingdom of the spiders' movie was a movie that you will never forget. It has an interesting plot and an interesting environment. Although, this movie was horrible and is a movie that will make every other movie you've seen seem like the best movie. This film had horrible acting, a horrible dialogue, and a horrible story line. The acting had either lack of emotion like when the farmer's prized cow died and all he could say was "What a crock". The acting also had some weird moments. Like when the little girl was surrounded by spiders on the bed, she was picked up and then dropped on the ground next to another bunch of spiders. The storyline also badly needed work. Half of the time you didn't know why or how something was happening and the story just kept on continuing. There were also some scenes that were extremely unbelievable, like when the farmer's wife was in a corner and there was a spider on her hand, she then shot her finger off by accident instead of brushing off the spider. Many scenes in this so-called horror story generated widespread laughs by the audience which everybody knows isn't supposed to happen while watching a horror film. The film also moved at a pretty slow pace in the beginning by showing a few spiders and only introducing new characters. The film also had a very open and disappointing ending. Instead of killing the pinned down humans to show their dominance the spiders simply left the whole down spun in a web and completely evacuated from the town. The camera angles used in this movie also showed no creativity, and were not interesting or impressive. Most of the time during this movie they were just level medium shots with the scene, which created an unwanted repetition that viewers don't appreciate. To the credit of this movie, it had a decent message. It was the killing the environment will impact us greatly, they message was shown in an extreme way. At the time people were polluting nature with chemicals and it was killing many of the wild inhabitants. This movie had a good message, but it lacked in every other possible aspect of movie making. I do not recommend this movie to anybody that once to see a decent movie. Although, it sure makes your own videos look better after watching this if you're a filmmaker.

Adam R (ru) wrote: Hugely disappointing. It's a weak thriller if you even want to call it a thriller. I found it a little confusing, and didn't feel that everything really tied together. (First and only viewing - 10/16/2014)

Alex r (ca) wrote: Decent disaster film, Earthquake continues the tradition of disaster films that became so popular during the early 70's, except now it's an earthquake that it's the disaster, and it is a film that is quite predictable in what the filmmakers try to do. The film has a good cast, but it never realizes anything truly entertaining, and quite frankly, of all the 70's era disaster films, Earthquake is among the weaker ones, With The Poseidon Adventure being the best of the genre. I really expected more out of the film, and though it was entertaining at times, the script's reliance on genre clichs really brought this one down a bit, and the performances were surprisingly average despite some very good talent attached to the project. This film might be enjoyed by fans of other disaster films of this period, but I've seen better overall and this one just doesn't end up being anything really good. Overall it's a decent affair that could have been much better. Earthquake doesn't break new ground in the genre; it does what every other disaster film has done, and it is fairly predictable. Don't go into this film expecting a truly entertaining film, this is no different than every other genre film, but the script suffers due to a lack of real tension, and the cast here just doesn't deliver anything that stands out among other genre films. I would recommend other films in the genre such as the one I stated earlier in this review. Earthquake could have been good fun, but it simply never really delivers anything truly entertaining, and overall the cast, despite having some good name here, are simply wasted on a lacking script. Earthquake isn't horrible, but it never is a good affair either. This is the type of film that you watch when you have nothing else to watch.

Phenyeia O (kr) wrote: Outstanding movie John Wayne is my family favorite actor

Rainer K (au) wrote: Lange Filme, kurze Filme, es ist mir eigentlich einerlei. Trotzdem lsst es mich immer aufhorchen wenn ein Film an der magischen drei Stunden Grenze kratzt.Bei groen Epen oder Monumentalfilmen wundert es mich selten, doch hie und da, kommen dann Filme wie La Dolce Vita" oder Magnolia" daher, bei denen ich mich frage, wie sie ihre drei Stunden ausfllen.Les Enfants du Paradis" ist ebenfalls in diese Kategorie einzuordnen. Oft gehandelt als das franzsische Pendant zu Gone with the Wind" fehlt ihm doch der Brgerkrieg, der Konflikt zwischen Norden und Sden und andere Thematiken, die einen Film ber solch lange Zeit am Leben erhalten knnen.Les Enfants du Paradis" fllt seine drei Stunden mit Theater. Ich wage zu behaupten, dies ist einer der furiosesten Filme ber Theater die je gemacht wurden. Es geht um Liebe zum Theater und Liebe im Theater.Ein wunderschner Film, mit ausgezeichneten Dialogen und gutem Schauspiel. Hervorzuheben ist v.a. Jean-Louis Barrault, der einen Pantomimen darstellt, der es im Laufe des Films zu groer Berhmtheit schafft.Knstlerisch ist es sehr eindrucksvoll wie Barrault den Pantomimen mimt. Barraults Deburau ist nicht der einzige farbenfrohe Charakter, man denke an Jericho, der fr Comedic Relief und etwas Dsterkeit sorgt, und auch der shakespearesche Schauspieler Frdrick, der es ebenfalls schlussendlich zu Ruhm und Reichtum bringt, aber zu Anfangs gefangen in der Kleinkunst ist, kann als solcher gelten.Immer wieder bietet der Film auch geniale Kamerafahrten, Massenszenen und Tracking Shots und sieht, alles in allem, einfach geil aus.Ein 3-Stunden Opus, der zwar nicht wirklich kurzweilig ist, aber immerhin schn anzusehen.

Charlie L (fr) wrote: Overly long, slow, and even harder to like when Montana is such an unlikeable lead.

Matt B (fr) wrote: Seann William Scott steals this movie. It's his best performance. He's HILARIOUS. This third sequel has plenty of raunchy, gag-worthy moments but works because of its sweet spot.