A Scotland Yard undercover detective is on the trail of a saboteur who is part of a plot to set off a bomb in London. But when the detective's cover is blown, the plot begins to unravel. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
A Scotland Yard undercover detective is on the trail of a saboteur who is part of a plot to set off a bomb in London. But when the detective's cover is blown, the plot begins to unravel.
You may also like
Sabotage torrent reviews
Keith R (fr) wrote: "You're In Hell! Welcome To Your Eternity" **SPOILERS**I found this item by chance while looking up the films of Charles Durning. The plot appeared that it might be of some interest. This film was described as "a thriller with a message." Three women, who had been expecting to abort their babies, wake up to find they -- along with a doctor -- have been kidnapped by what the believe to be a fanatical anti-abortion group. Their "jailer" addresses them from a closed-circuit television. It is his intention to compel them to deliver their unwanted babies. Instead of your usual horror fare, the women are dressed in nightgowns and fed decent food, while reading and watching propaganda on why abortion is bad.They are shown purportedly video taped messages from their families and the settle into a routine. Inevitably, they go into labour -- simultaneously! The babies are delivered -- one, most outspoken pro-abortionist of the three gives birth to twins. Afterwards, the one who had twins is sick and in pain. After examining her, the doctor is dumbfounded to discover something that she says "is impossible." She informs the woman she is still pregnant. The woman says "it can't be." Suddenly it transpires that the two other women who gave birth there were never real; it turns out that the die-harder had died on the abortion table and the doctor had committed suicide -- they are, and always have been, in Hell. The story for most of the film went along a clear and straight forward premise. It turned out to be a blas story with little intrigue for most of it. But the twist at the end ruined it even on that level.The whole premise that a grumpy old man kidnapped three pregnant women from abortion clinics to force them to give birth is plausible. The whole story presents that premise with the videos from the families and the interaction of the three women and doctor. The reveal at the end that only the one girl and the doctor are real and that they are in hell totally invalidated everything throughout the movie. The entire story of the film is shown to have been deception; there's just no reason for such a development. They are in Hell -- there's no reason for them to be told otherwise. And the faked videos from the families really is a stupid turn. They are dead so their families wouldn't be sending any such messages -- there's no reason for it.The twist at the end only made a story that was lack-luster at best, a complete waste of time.
RayNormanBateman (de) wrote: I've always been interested in J. Edgar as a person because there are a lot of rumours about his private life yet no one knows what is true and what is made up. The movie kind of touches on all those so called stories, maybe with caution as it does not exactly say he was gay or a cross dresser but hints at him experiencing both aspects. I think Leo does a great job as always but the film does feel long and sometimes drags on with nothing much happening.I think the issue here is that Edgar was a very interesting man and there is so much to look into and to show on a live screen that it would never work properly. I have always admired Eastwood's directing skills and i thought he did a decent job here too.
Deedee W (it) wrote: So romantic. Love Diane Lane and Richard Gere together.
kelly (de) wrote: I did not know this culture existed and this film provides a very interesting glimpse into the world of outcasts shunned by other outcasts. Check out the HULU page discussions on this for a thorough exploration of the piece.
angel m (au) wrote: Omg 2 fave parts made me lauph ... The barn with the cows and the sluty milk maids, And The Kids Wet Dream in the forest This is a rilly QT show !
Jessica R (nl) wrote: A great combination of ghost story and naval movie.Creepy with a thunderous ending.
Cj O (mx) wrote: The acting isn't good anymore. The SFX were a lot better in the first. The story is bad. And the names they choose for the villains are still worse than the names with obvious origins in the Star Wars films.
Gordon S (kr) wrote: Swayze was excellent and he wasn't alone. I found the movie a bit on the long side but I suppose it takes some time to forge the bonds of these new (or improved) relationships and of course to witness the personal alterations that also transpire... Even though the envelop for socially acceptable in the 50's is pushed, its definately worth a look.
Kyle S (de) wrote: Awful movie. Honestly the Stiller father son duo, you would think would be movie magic and it was the complete opposite. The movie starts out actually pretty good and has almost all of it's laughs in the first 20 minutes. Aside from the Danny McBride few few actual funny jokes which you'd expect from him and the rest of the cast but only he delivers, the rest of the laughs are in the first 20 minutes of the movie. And the thing that bothered me the most was the ending. Seriously, am I the only person that found this to be maybe the worst ending to a movie of all time. I mean seriously, I'm not going to spoil it but it was the worst ending of all time. It really pissed me off. (60, D-)
Patricia K (it) wrote: I think this is the best movie adaption of a Greek tragedy set in Rio.
Ryan S (es) wrote: 4.5/5. A really excellent western with outstanding performances all around. The train itself isn't in the film much, and I was really hoping for an action scene involving the train, but apart from that, 3:10 to Yuma delivers more than one would expect.
Jens S (ru) wrote: That's what a comic book adaption should be like: not taking itself too seriously, excellent choices of actors (Ron Perlman is the perfect Hellboy), awesome set and production design, great special effects and just a whole lot of fun. The pace is not quite as perfect as in part two, but the package works.
Gareth D (es) wrote: Make it up as you waffle along rubbish.
Kyle M (au) wrote: Same enjoyment level as "Glory Road," but with more spirits. (A-)(Full review coming soon - with better wording probably)
Elise H (fr) wrote: lou ferrigno,aka the hulk, as sinbad, if that is not the funniest thing you have ever heard of, watch the movie. the only reason this gets 4 stars is just because it was so bad it was hilalrious. this movie was so awful, all of the costumes looked like they were designed by liberace, especailly the skin tight spandex on the men. lests not forget the dubbing and awful dialog as well. this was just so awful, it put the bad in sinbad. my eyes and earys still hurt. and another thing, the music is just awful, it sounded like it belonged in a really bad video game.
Ifrah A (ca) wrote: mediocre acting. mediocre storyline.
RODNEY G (fr) wrote: as good as the first one and the cast being the same made it even better for myself. Olympus Has Fallen being the first