Sankat City

Sankat City

Owning several aquariums, fish-loving Mumbai-based Guru makes a living stealing cars, getting them to his garage-owner friend, Ganpat Gajanan Jagirdar, and re-selling them through an associate, Sharafat. One day he steals a Mercedez and takes it to Ganpat. They inspect the car, find a bag containing Rs.1 Crore, decide to keep it and improve their lifestyles. Ganpat 'refurbishes' the vehicle, and Sharafat finds a buyer in Suleman, who quite unfortunately, recognizes it, and informs the owner, Fauzdaar - a ruthless gangster and money-lender. Guru is located, interrogated brutally, and agrees to return the cash which is still stashed in the garage. When he goes there - Ganpat, who had hidden the cash, has met with an accident, is gravely injured, and requires immediate hospitalization. While recuperating, the doctor finds that he has completely lost his memory. With rising fears of a meteor crashing in the city...

A petty car thief and his garage-owner partner get in the bad books of a ruthless gangster. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Sankat City torrent reviews

Jeffrey R (mx) wrote: I changed my diet after watching this. Enough said.

Kurt R (us) wrote: Horrible. A very homemade flick with awful effects and a ton of talking. Pretty much 2 sets are used. Twist at the end, but you won't care if you make it that far. Foree and Haig are underutilized and laughable, but Pratt is good. Oddly this film doesn't start with any studio logos or credits....

Cayla B (jp) wrote: slow start but gets better with time


Joseph R (us) wrote: a-ma-zing, piven is a master of dialogue and i dont care if the hair was going away, he and john favreau made this movie great

John C (es) wrote: An undiscovered gem in the rough. I don't believe I've ever seen a performance by Voight quite like this.

Shaun B (de) wrote: Loosely based on a novel by Dennis Wheatly. Notable as being Hammer's final film. Hammer was starting to look rather dated and old fashioned compard to the new wave of American films coming out at this time. Shame really as the film was in fact a fascinating glimpse of a possible more modern direction. The film deals with the occult and satanism which has a very Rosemary's Baby feel to it. A pleasent watch throughout with some great acting on show, notably Christopher Lee as the evil priest. The only real problem with this film is the rather silly tacked on ending which i gather didn't go down well, especially the author himself. All in all a decent send off from the Hammer series. Just a shame they couldn't come up with a better ending. 6.5/10

Jon R (mx) wrote: The movie is definitely mis-titled, as the "puppet people" never really do attack Mr. Franz. This movie has some really great scenes, but it also has many horrid ones. Interesting, to say the least.

Will V (ru) wrote: True to its improv style

Paul D (us) wrote: Something of a poor mans Underworld clone, but it's the miscast male leads which really bring this film down.

Steve W (gb) wrote: There is nothing positive I can say about Runner Runner because it is a complete mess with very lackluster performances. There is no denying there is a lot of talent involved here, but somewhere along the way something was lost. Furman proved he could direct a strong and intelligent film in The Lincoln Lawyer, but Runner Runner is nowhere close to what he had achieved in the past. We all know what Ben Affleck is capable of; he just came off with an Oscar for his work in Argo, but in this film his performances was completely uninspired. Gemma Arterton had nothing to work with here, but she accomplished what she was signed up for: looking good on camera. Justin Timberlake couldn't save this film either despite trying to put some effort into his role and trying to look believable. He has done some great work in the past, but this just might be the role that makes him stick to music from now on (or taking secondary roles). Runner Runner is a waste of talent and a waste of time for the audience. You will completely forget about this film the moment you walk out of the cinema because there is nothing engaging about it. It doesn't move you or touch you in any way. If fails to draw you in to their world and there is no suspense whatsoever.

the d (gb) wrote: HATED DEADPOOLThe acting was bad, the humor only gave me cringe, the CGI and "gore" sucked, dull action, bad story and the totally undeserved hype, taking into consideration how "smart" the film constantly sold itself.... When actually it was just the same crap again, though even dummer, unfunny, and worst of all, boring. 2/10?