Sex Doll

Sex Doll

Set in London's world of high class call girls, Amoureux Solitaires tells the story of London based French escort Virginie, and Rupert, a man who rescues trafficked girls.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:102 minutes
  • Release:2016
  • Language:English, French
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:Sex Doll 2016 full movies, Sex Doll torrents movie

The movie tells a tale of modern love, following Rupert (Ash Stymest) as he tries to rescue Virginie (Hafsia Herzi), a London-based French escort, from her work as a high-class call girl. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Sex Doll torrent reviews

Donato S (es) wrote: oh my God! Love the serie

Tony B (nl) wrote: 3.5/5 Stars; it has a Juno-ish feel only more indie and less clever. Nice performances, three dimensional characters, and the fact that it is set in small town Pennsylvania vaults it a bit for me.

Mark F (br) wrote: A Pixar movie about dogs was always going to be a winner. This wasn't absolute top notch but it was fun.

Charlie G (fr) wrote: This was well done. A lot of adventure as in the first movie. I would watch this one again.

Denislav R (ru) wrote: So I decided to rewatch it, cuz I saw it on George Takei's filmogrphy and thought "Wait. This movie isn't THAT Bad!" And this movie's score perfectly shows why the tomatometer shouldn't be the end all be all for movies. I s it as good as the original? No. That's a Disney thing I suspect. The first movie is amazing and the next one is a harmless cheesy flick. It's fun. It has some charm. It's just more of the same. And I don't see that much bad of it. At least not as much bad as in those live-action remakes they do. It's just a not so catchy, a bit more cheesy Mulan 1. And I can live with that. More of a "Leave the kid in front of the TV and whatever you want" kind of movie. Is it bad? Yes. But it's the harmless "wasting an hour of your time" kind of bad. Not even as "I shouldn't have watched the movie". More of a "Meh, I did nothing for an hour and 15 min. Big deal" Not a good movie, but if you have nothing else to do- it's entertaining enough.

Dave R (au) wrote: It was a funny one watching older movies sometimes is just better then the new ones

Robin P (au) wrote: Pretty racey for a Dick Van Dyke/Debbie Reynolds 60's movie. Quirky, original movie which dramatizes and plays with divorce and what happens to families in the wake of it. Great cast, enjoyable story.

EllenRebekah A (jp) wrote: Very interesting adaptation. Certainly provides scope for the people and place, and the devastation and hope. Many changes to most understandings of Moses' character and the representation of God. I suppose they wanted something we could relate to more, less strange than a burning bush or clouds. But God is strange, and beyond us. And yet present and also terrifyingly powerful. It was interesting to see the idea of the Prince General he might have been. But he is also described as a poor speaker, not a warrior. Not really sure why Sigouney Weaver would want such a part of Ramses' mother who barely speaks. But Ben Kingsley was not bad as Nun, Joshua's father. Should give a place for discussion to teens and adults.

Brendan S (jp) wrote: Yeah, wtf is right. Though it's both well acted and complexity surreal