A wealthy, decadent count convinces a disillusioned playboy that they shall murder one another's relatives, to get away with the perfect crime. The count murders the playboy's unpleasant ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
A wealthy, decadent count convinces a disillusioned playboy that they shall murder one another's relatives, to get away with the perfect crime. The count murders the playboy's unpleasant ...
You may also like
Slam Out torrent reviews
Richard D (it) wrote: Here's a black comedy ... a dark black comedy. Schwartzman stars as a novellist about to publish his second novel. He's a terrible terrible person ... a perfrect blend of ego and insecurity. Moss is his live-in girlfriend who has already lost all faith in the relationship as the film starts. It gets worth. Jonathan Pryce plays an older successful novelist who takes Schwartzman under his wing. He's a terrible man who is facing the fact that he has systematically shed all his family and friends. As a film it may remind you of a more ascerbic Woody Allen piece of a Noah Baumbach film from his "The Squid and the Whale" days, but the fact that Pryce reminds one of Philip Roth more precisely locates where this film is coming from. It's the most successful Roth adaptation not based on any of Roth's work.
Joel S (nl) wrote: If you have any curiosity about bitcoin, this is a great place to start.
Tim S (it) wrote: should be catnip for "Sons of Anarchy" fans
Angel L (de) wrote: it's funny and sweet, but something doesnt make sense
Austin G (jp) wrote: It definitely shows that Kevin James is better in the movies without Adam Sandler being involved.
Amreen G (fr) wrote: dont know why it took me s long to catch this one. truly entertaining.. loved Rajeev.
Andrew A (kr) wrote: Super documentary. The different styles of the three guitarists is brought out so well. Page is pure class. White is pure bohemian cool.
Ibrahim A (nl) wrote: I don't know why I love "Flashbacks of a Fool" so much, maybe because of Daniel Craig's powerful performance, or it is the feeling of nostalgia that this movie provides.
Olivier D (mx) wrote: Dur, noir mais trs russis pour un film franais du genre
conrad t (kr) wrote: This is a really good australian film. David Wenham's performance is a stand out.
Tom H (mx) wrote: 13.08.1993, 09.05.2013,11.05.2013,24.03.2017
Graeme B (ru) wrote: Better than the first and on a par with the second. Some really dated and corny stage effects ( watch out for Lloyd's Klingon villain falling off a rising rock on Genesis as he fights Kirk), but also some nice visuals for its time, specifically the docking station scenes and the new Starfleet ship. Acting is average and i still cannot quite get over just how quickly Kirk gets over the execution of his son. The plot is so busy dealing with the bromance between Spock and Kirk, it fails to deal with this personal tragedy adequately and makes the whole thing seem unnecessary.
Sandeep C (mx) wrote: An interesting perspective of world from the eyes of a madman, or more correctly a man who thinks he is mad. I found this one of the movies you do not know why you are drawn to see to the very end.
Lee M (kr) wrote: Poitier's always a pleasure to watch, even when the story surrounding him isn't exactly captivating.
WK J (gb) wrote: aka Attack of the Mutant Gumbys.
Paul D (ru) wrote: I am surprised that I actually made it to the credits! I hated this more than words can describe! Very boring. No matter how hard I tried, I could not get into this or care about it at all.
Kylie C (es) wrote: This movie totally confused me because it jumped back and forth so much and the girl would black out and such. But after watching it all, I finally wasn't confused. It was an easy to guess the ending movie, too.