Suing The Devil

Suing The Devil

Luke O'Brien, a washed-up salesman turned night law student, decides to sue Satan for $8 trillion dollars. On the last day before Luke files a default judgment, Satan appears to defend himself. On Satan's legal team are 10 of the country's best trial lawyers. The entire world watches on Legal TV to see who will win the Trial of the Century

down-and-out law studentĀ for 8 trillion dollars. On the last day before Luke files a default judgment, Satan appears to defend himself. On Satan';s legal team are ten of the World';s best trial lawyers. The entire world watches on Legal TV to see who will win the Trial of the Century. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Suing The Devil torrent reviews

Spencer G (br) wrote: this looks reele good!this looks reele good!

Multitron R (nl) wrote: "The Incredible Hulk" is endless smashing but does not have a fun enough story to follow along.

David T (es) wrote: After almost 20 years Disney's ambitious musical comes here. The movie "Tangled" besides the well made story of Rapunzel and the funny moments. Has sth everyone has tried to do. An excellent musical movie. I think is a very well Disney movie.

Brett C (mx) wrote: Review In A Nutshell:For me Ronin is a film of two halves, the first one about the obtaining of the mysterious grey/silver case and the second about the betrayal and the chase in obtaining it back. My feeling towards the film is split, with the first half of the film being wonderfully handled. It showed us how these hired men, all of which possess a specific task and skill-set, prepared themselves for the job. Watching these men plan their mission is exciting, the film was able to suck me in and having me wanting more. I wanted to understand the process of being in this business and the personalities that found within it; though the film delivers this at a satisfying level, I did want the film to be a bit more indulgent as it would have given a film a bit color during the early quiet sequences of the film.The film's second half on the other hand was quite dull, it failed to maintain my interest as it starts to lose that sense of professionalism that was found on the first film, it started to feel more like a payback/revenge film. It relies so much in its action sequences to maintain one's interest, which it did for me some of the time, but it still felt highly unsatisfying with a human story that fails to remain interesting. At least this half was able to deliver a more than satisfying car sequence that doesn't rely on abundance on shooting or explosions to inject that sense of adrenaline. The film's resolution was a tad bit underwhelming, as I expected it to somehow top or at least match the intensity found in the previous scenes.I was satisfied with Robert De Niro's, Sam, performance in this film as it is clear that he has given the role a bit more than what was expected. My expectations for the actor were low for this film, and with that mindset I think that did make a difference with how I feel about his performance. I just love the scenes he had against Sean Bean as one can truly feel the dislike the character feels for Spence. Jean Reno on the other hand started off decent then as the film went on, I got more and more bored of his performance; remaining interchangeable throughout the entire film.Ronin has potential, and it is one of the reasons why I would consider watching this again in the future. It features a story that started off strong then failing to hold my interest during the second hour of the film. It also features a sufficient performance from De Niro and action sequences that are above the films similar to its nature.

David M (ru) wrote: This movie is unbelievably relatable. We all wish we could be Randall, but in reality, we're all Dante. We've been through a job that we despised, we felt stuck in a rut, and we made our problems sound like the worst thing ever. This film can actually change the way you view your situation in life and probably urge you to think about your next move.

Erin O (es) wrote: Has a few inadvertently funny moments. Mostly pretty lame, though.

Tim M (nl) wrote: Needed more Lorenzo.

George I (it) wrote: The second time I've seen this, and I'm not gonna pretend I know what it's about. The first time (which was within the last few years) I had the creepy feeling that I wasn't watching fiction, which is not the same as believing this is a documentary (those are often a type of fiction as well). There was a little of that this time, but with more of a sense of watching a dream of someone watching a dream. Aren't dreams fiction? No. Not necessarily. Dreams are often an arrangement of sights, sounds, and (or) sensations that try to make sense of one's current state of being, mentally and most likely physically (it's one machine). There's a non-linear logic at work, but it's still truth, not fiction.

Greg D (ru) wrote: The film could be titled "Empty Nest Syndrome" because that is essentially the whole of the story. As a young boy Apu's father dies and is raised by his widow mother. Apu receives a scholarship to college and leaves his mother to go study. He becomes too preoccupied with his work and his studies that he rarely visits her. This sounds like a simple plot line but to the films credit, it is told in a structurally heart wrenching way. You do feel sorry for the mother and you do understand Apu's side (especially as a college boy myself). The film does lag from time to time however. Slow can be good, but sometimes it cannot be so good.

Sean S (br) wrote: Viewing this film today, especially if it's the misguided American edit dubbed "Creepers", it would be easy to think Argento had sold his soul to Hollywood and produced a work of best-forgotten mid-1980s American horror schlock. But it's not so, and the American marketing campaign should be ignored. Jennifer Connelly and Donald Pleasence are both interesting cast choices for a film that somewhat sanitises Argento's creepy, often disturbing imagery and work. But it's still here, just in a modified form; Connelly playing Jennifer (!) Corvino who has a gift for telepathy with insects doesn't result in the kind of film you'd think it would, and in typical Argento fashion, there are twists right up until the end--as in those other 1980s works though, there aren't distracting cliches to be found here.