Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance

Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance

This is the story of Ryu, a deaf man, and his sister, who requires a kidney transplant. Ryu's boss, Park, has just laid him off, and in order to afford the transplant, Ryu and his girlfriend develop a plan to kidnap Park's daughter. Things go horribly wrong, and the situation spirals rapidly into a cycle of violence and revenge.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:127 minutes
  • Release:2002
  • Language:Korean,Korean Sign Language
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:murder,   robbery,   suicide,  

A recently laid off factory worker kidnaps his former boss' daughter, hoping to use the ransom money to pay for his sister's kidney transplant. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance torrent reviews

Tristan D (mx) wrote: How in the fucking world did rottentomatoes critics give this a 73%?! Yes, this is a fun movie to pick at, but this got a Certified Fresh Rating. Yes, that's right, this movie got a higher rating than Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb, Pacific Rim, Lucy, and many other much better movies. What are you guys thinking? If it's a guilty pleasure movie, you rate it based on that's it bad, meaning 3 or 4 out of 10, and then you say it's a fun bad movie to watch. By rating the movie like this, you're making it out that it's a genuinely well made cinematic movie, and that is bullshit.

JoJo (mx) wrote: ????? I haven't much to say about this film

Mark H (au) wrote: A fellow grad-student in a history class likened Solomon Perel's tale of survivial during WWII to a 'Forest Gump-like tale" - it truly couldn't be summed up better than that. The film has everything one could hope for in a foreign-made big budget movie, historical nuance, humor, and a very very young Julie Delpy.

Tyler S (us) wrote: Freaky creepy crawlers brace the screen and the outcome is one of genuine disgust and terror. Solid flick with a nice performance from Daniels and excellent John Goodman cameo.

Morris A (it) wrote: Can never get old seeing Morgan Freeman ranting. Classic film and a definite keeper in the collection.

Josh T (it) wrote: A classic that stands the test of time.

Gleb I (gb) wrote: dark, a film noir with wit and a romantic element.. a little dragged out though. a good performance by Gable but the rest of it isn't revolutionnary; score, screenplay and cinematography combined. this movie doesn't live up to its full potential.

Peter S (mx) wrote: Wow, what a great debut! Darren Aronofsky is one of the most interesting directors today, probably best known for directing requiem for a dream and black swan. If you are unfamiliar with his directing style, or have not seen any David lynch films, you will probably be very weirded out, or bored to tears until Max starts having his bursts of insanity and when his findings prove to cause trouble. If you've seen requiem for a dream, it has the same kind of filming and fast editing, like when Max pours cream in his coffee and when he takes his pills a lot of times. This film is utterly fantastic, not necessarily a must see, but it's still a hell of a ride!

Holly E (it) wrote: Lovely heartfelt movie

Andrea E (kr) wrote: I loved this book as a child but the movie was nothing like what I imagined or remembered from reading it. It also doesn't help that there has been an onslaught of these movies in the last 10 years or so, many of which have been better. I waited forever for The Giver to be on the big screen and it was definitely a disappointment.

Andrew J (it) wrote: The last 30 minutes made this palatable, especially the call out to 2001: A Space Odyssey