Terminator 2: Judgment Day

Terminator 2: Judgment Day

Nearly 10 years have passed since Sarah Connor was targeted for termination by a cyborg from the future. Now her son, John, the future leader of the resistance, is the target for a newer, more deadly terminator. Once again, the resistance has managed to send a protector back to attempt to save John and his mother Sarah.

Almost 10 years have passed since the first cyborg called The Terminator tried to kill Sarah Connor and her unborn son, John Connor. Now John, the future leader of the resistance, is the target for a newer, more deadly terminator. A second protector is sent back to the past by the Human resistance to protect John, at all costs. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Terminator 2: Judgment Day torrent reviews

Alfin N (kr) wrote: Learning about God is basically learning about yourself.If you don't know yourself, you're bound to miss His whole truth, whatever your religion is.

Cedric L (kr) wrote: Well-animated with charming characters and a sense of adventure.

hii p (us) wrote: I love this movie it has such great emotions~~

Jimmy C (nl) wrote: Grandement inspir de la nouvelle vague, le film s'amuse dlibrment avec la narrativit pour raconter sous diffrentes faons et techniques une histoire sommes toutes simple, mais qui s'amplifient de diverses rflections tout comme de degrs. l'aide d'une photographie lumineuse, d'une camra anime, d'un montage rythm et d'une ralisation attentive, le film capte notre intrt jusqu' sa fin, charnire et magnifique. Excellentes interprtations, tout comme les savoureux dialogues. Brillant.

Carlos I (ag) wrote: Bruce Willis and Miko Hughes are pretty good in this, but there's not really much else to phone home about...

James C (it) wrote: A campy crime/love story intersects with random vignettes from the lives of various hustlers on Santa Monica boulevard. The protagonist, an pretty and amoral dumbster, robs a hippy trick and steals his car, running over and maiming a skinhead in the process. A prissy writer comes to the city and becomes obsessed with the same hustler. They get together, talk about the history of hustling on the boulevard and end up snogging on the beach (after a near fatal jacuzzi accident). The surrounding vignettes are more outr, with a singing cowboy saddling and riding a young man, s&m mortician snuffing out an amputee and a white twink raped by half a dozen hung black men. All in a day's work seems to be the moral. A postmodern plunge into some pretty disconnected lives, with references to Warhol, Baby Jane and Sunset Boulevard thrown in for good measure.

Brian W (br) wrote: Based on the true story of a group of teenaged boys who spend a semester of school aboard a sailing vessel captained by Jeff Bridges who tries to instill a sense of pride and respect in these otherwise lost youths who are put to the ultimate test when their boat sinks after being hit by a raging storm known as a white squall.

RichardYves S (kr) wrote: Flawed but very engaging, and a distinct improvement on that wretched W.P. Kinsella crap that inspired it. As a rezzified Shauganaush, I can sympathize with anyone who gets initiated "the hard way" into a Nishnaab family. Podemski is a goddess, and the Secola soundtrack is rightly popular.

Soham G (kr) wrote: "I understand and appreciate what Cox was trying to do with this film, really I do, but what I can't get past is the terrible execution, the bad characterization and the atrocious disregard for viewers intelligence. Maybe a completely noble miscalculation, but still a miscalculation."

Gustave K (es) wrote: the paradox within the cultural temperament of 1960s america is the juxtaposition of sexual liberation (free love among the youth) and the height of bourgeois suburban dream, the co-existence of radical activism and the conservative reactionary. thus "strangers when we meet" is the mediocre lukewarm product moulded by such social atmosphere. on the one hand, it encourages emancipation for married woman to re-vitalize her confidence meanwhile it also dubs moralistic pedogogy that marriage is a commitment which should not be nullfied. kim novak plays a housewife with a wooden un-passionate husand who demands her to put her clothes on in order to appear decent in their own house (come on, your wife is kim novak, wouldn't you supposedly be more passionate to such voluptuous woman?) thus she finds herself suffocated in a lifeless marriage, and she seeks solace from her neighbor, who happens also to be married, who also finds his wife quite insensitive to his passions of life, frustrated by the lack of mental connections and spiritua)l communications. in one scene, novak without bra, in a scarlett (flesh-red dress requests the man to kiss in a hissing exclamation as if she's sensually requesting for orgasm as you could clearly see the tempting shape of her naked bossom. the ending is that the woman just bids farewell to the man graciously without making a fuss about his sudden decision to depart and leave her in a loveless marriage. it's like saying: we have had a great fun together, and eventually i will return home to be a good little wife and you could easily take off. ok, perhaps i ideologize everything, it feels like a patronization of hugh hefner-esque chauvinism. yes, free love is only doable under the premise that woman is the man's plaything without any actual romantic consequence. (and woman, you're on your own, since i'm gonna help you.) BUT, how could you do except just letting him go? strangers when we meet, still strangers after you put your pants back on! quite a roller-coaster ride of free love without paying the ticket fair, isn't it?

John R (br) wrote: 150501: When this movie first started I thought it was going to be pure stupidity. Custer is portrayed as an idiot at the beginning but, as we see his luck and tactics for climbing the ranks, the story blossoms to become a classic. Without considering the historical accuracy of this film, I can say it's pure entertainment. Some great acting here from Flynn. Loved the relationship between Custer and Libby. Desperately want to look up details on the life of Lt. Butler. And, there is at least one really cool horse stunt. The only area lacking in my opinion was development of the First Nations characters. Would've been nice to get to know Crazy Horse a bit more. Good film. Well worth a western fan's time.

Jim M (jp) wrote: Slow, uninteresting, unoriginal, poorly, filmed, poorly acted mess. At least its short. People actually watched this?

Nio B (ru) wrote: A legendary silent crime serial in ten episodes. I guess the original caper caper or the mix nuts caper...no matter its a long mission. "full of disappearances and disguises, sudden death and uncanny resurrections, hidden trapdoors and secret tunnels" This film is one of my early influence... as we can slowly see coming out from the dark experiment...of social science

Matt C (fr) wrote: Not scary just trips you out psychological ok movie


Dallin K (kr) wrote: I really, really did not like this movie. I was hoping for something upbeat and inspirational but there was very little with that. There was way too much time dedicated to the things people do you wrong and not enough to hope and inspiration. Ended the movie feeling dark and depressed. It seemed like the movie tried to do too much and scenes sometimes seemed random or inconsistent with other scenes. Really did not like this movie.