The Arnelo Affair

The Arnelo Affair

A neglected wife gets mixed up with an hypnotic charmer and murder.

Anne Parkson feels neglected by her lawyer-husband Ted, so she falls in love with night-club owner Tony Arnello, a shady character who is a client of her husband's. This being a MGM picture... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

The Arnelo Affair torrent reviews

Jeffrey H (ru) wrote: Saw this movie in Hong Kong I think. It was both scary and hilarious. Loved it! trying to find it on dvd. Had some good dry humor as well as slapstick. Surprised it's not doing better here.

Jeffrey C (br) wrote: It's funny, and has a good plot, but some of the acting is REALLY bd.

Andreas K (jp) wrote: En skon ma bra film av Tysklands svar pa Joseph Fares

Sara E (de) wrote: An uncompromising tale of dirty deeds, vengeance and love.When you've adjusted to the haze of blood-drenched hallucinations and perpetually grinning maniacs you'll a find a solid story and fascinating characters. Also, this film is pure gleeful, carnage soaked FUN :D

Tom G (fr) wrote: White Squall is at it's most beautiful and inspirational when it doesn't try to be. However, it is a great lesson in character development and genuine story telling. Heartbreaking to its core, White Squall is definitely one to watch.

Andres C (br) wrote: I liked the movie but it hurts very badly acted Georges Corraface as Christopher Columbus. Timothy Dalton was better. But the performance of Benicio del Toro worth. And Mario Puzo knows nothing of Christopher Columbus.

GMan (kr) wrote: this was a classic i loved this one

Adam S (kr) wrote: I don't see much stylistic difference between this film and other Mizoguchi films of this late period in his career, but according to Tony Rayns on his typically excellent overview of the film on the Masters of Cinema DVD, Mizoguchi, ever the grumpy studio auteur, wasn't happy with the assignment (or the leading man), and breezed through the shoot (his third of the year) in a month's time. Despite Mizoguchi's reservations about the studio assignment and his actors, there's no denying that his cinematic form is impeccable as always, and Miyagawa's cinematography is overwhelmingly beautiful.

sabrina i (br) wrote: This one is sortof like 'The Killers' except it improves on it in one aspect - the love story. That film lacked the intense passion we usually see in noirs so this one more or less makes up for it. Lancaster's character is clearly obsessed with his ex-wife and we see him ruin his life over it. Typical noir, we got a narration, we got fatalism, we got the moody lighting, a heist..so I guess this one is like noir's greatest hits. Pretty much whatever one loves about noir-this film has. Still, I found some parts of the film surprising. It wasn't all predictable and Lancaster is very good in this. I didn't feel sorry for him, his character is an idiot :P though I'd like to say I'm always fascinated by how in film noir-these character always talk about being pulled towards something or how it's their fate and they have no control or how they know they shouldn't be doing what they are doing but can't stop themselves. They KNOW it won't end well but they give in and just let it happen. That's what I find so fascinating about film noir. Anyways, my favorite scene is one that's quite suspenseful...when Lancaster is in his hospital bed and is pretty much just waiting to be murdered. Excellent scene, beautifully photographed. Overall...great noir!

SV G (ag) wrote: A sweet ol' classic starring Clark Gable as Blackie a nightclub and gambling hall owner who's bestfriend is a Priest played by Spencer Tracy. Blackie hires and falls for a songstress played by Jeanette McDonald and this all leads up to the San Francisco earthquake of 1908 - of which this movie from 1936 surprisingly does very good special effects for it's time. A big tear-jerker of an ending.

Baurushan J (fr) wrote: Probably one of the most underrated Sharon Stone films if not the most. This is my review of Sliver. The story is about a book editor named Carly played by Sharon Stone who moves into a new apartment and meets a few curious neighbours especially Zeke played by William Baldwin who is hiding something from her even though Carly is attracted to Zeke. While Zeke, an obsessive voyeur, watches his tenants from a bank of television screens at his headquarters. But when Carly discovers Zeke's voyeurism, she herself becomes obsessed with the daily lives of her neighbors. Whilst so many critics may hate this movie, for me, this movie was so good. It has strong writing, powerful performances, an intense soundtrack and an ending you never see coming towards till the very last second. Sharon Stone is a sexy badass in this movie and she will get you laid within less than halfway through the movie, trust me. All the other actors including William Baldwin, Tom Berenger and CCH Pounder all give strong performances. Overall, Sliver is an intense, glorious, dramatic, suspenseful, mystery-filled masterpiece. Sliver gets a 9/10.

Henry P (it) wrote: 1/14/17A long time ago, in a living room far, far away...Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones ReviewThere is unrest in the minds of Star Wars fans. The Phantom Menace just kept its head above water, worth sitting through at least once or every-now-and-then. The next chronological installment/second prequel does just that too, with less Jar-Jar (Ahmed Best). We open with the opening crawl (obviously) and then tilt up instead of down to Coruscant, where Naboo's Senator arrives, before an explosion takes her life. Wait, that was a decoy, and real Senator/Former Queen Padme Amidala (Natalie Portman) reveals herself to be among the pilots (wow, those Nabooians are so cautious with their leaders, and maybe a little paranoid). What follows is a series of people talking in circles (which repeats itself throughout and brings space adventures and mysteries to a screeching halt), and then things heat up when Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor) and Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen) arrive to guard Senator Amidala after their only run-in with Jar-Jar, who's been reduced in role for this movie, but expanded in role for the larger Star Wars Universe. When a bounty hunter tries killing Padme, Obi-Wan and Anakin get into a high-octane speeder chase that ends with the beginning of a conspiracy being pulled apart throughout. Instead of just focusing on this conspiracy, we get Anakin doing more Padme guarding injected in, followed by their bad romance, which can be explained simply: they've been repressing their emotions in the decade between I and II for the good of the Jedi Order and their political system. Maybe it was the force keeping balance, but I'm gonna admit this love story gets cringe worthy, but whatever you feel about it, this is Lucas' vision. Sorry to say his vision also had a mix of great and horrendous CGI. The good news: Coruscant and Kamino were brilliant looking and the massive CGI battles (while lacking a human link to humanize it) didn't blow you away, even if it was a little too big. The bad news is that several green-screens are so obviously fake. The ones used for windows showing Coruscant's skyline worked well, but when you see Anakin riding his speeder down the Tatooine dunes or Dooku doing the same thing in the Geonosis dunes. The CGI characters aren't horrendous, just a little odd (this technology was in its infancy at the time) but well detailed. And they advance the plot in some form or another. All of this is set to John Williams' great soundtrack, that never fails to disappoint. His main theme music "Across the Stars" really captures the romantic tension George Lucas fails to sell if you don't think about how emotionally repressed the two are. Their dialogue isn't great, but the bad dialogue can actually have some good meaning: Anakin's "sand monologue," as I call it, is actually a reasonable thing for him to say, because he grew up on a desert planet, in the sand! Just like eskimos would have more words for snow than we do, he would have more knowledge and descriptiveness for sand. It feels redundant, but it's something he knows, and it's what he can use as a parallel to Padme in his twisted world of joining the Jedi Order too late. Overall, Attack of the Clones is not the attack on cinema people make it out to be, but I can understand why: mixed-result CGI and never-ending political debates bringing the pace to a screeching halt to the space adventure. I know this is just opinion, but I like (not love) Attack of the Clones for its coherent story, decent (but forgivably flawed) character development, everything there for the sake of telling how the war Anakin Skywalker would fight in and eventually lead to the Original Trilogy, a John Williams soundtrack that does its job in the movie and is worth listening to outside of it, and dialogue that makes sense to George Lucas and the Star Wars Universe, but not to most other people. Thanks, and may the force be with you.9/21/13Coming off the heels of The Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones proves to be my least favorite Star Wars. While the CGI imagery improved, the story proves to drag on and on with things like flying through Coruscant being one of only few exciting scenes. Hayden Christianson takes on the role of an Anakin 10 years older than Jake Lloyd's. While girls and women may like his looks, no one will like his acting. And they say Natalie Portman sounded like a robot in The Phantom Menace. She was speaking in a royal tone to sound dignified, and allow Kiera Knightly as her royal body double to go unnoticed. This is unexcusable. This is why I prefer Matt Lanter's Clone Wars voice. Confident, bold, neither of these are present in Hayden Christianson. Ewan McGregor starts to look more like the Obi-Wan my parents knew before George Lucas and Steven Spielburg snapped. The plot may not be desirable to retro fans, but here's the thing: Jedi worked for Republic, they strayed from light, that's what this is about. Sorry it's so political, but we should just accept that's how the Jedi Order fell. Finally, the dialogue was pretty stale. Mostly. Some lines actually stuck in my mind. If I listed them, I'd spoil the movie. If you like chronological order like me, or enjoy a solid John Williams Soundtrack, or just like quality abuse of CGI, I'd reccomend this movie. But not if you hate abuse of CGI, if you hate dull actors (Sorry Hayden, but you should have used a little more emotion) or just wish to forget this one. Until next time, may the force be with JJ Abrams for Episode VII.5/12/12Star Wars Episode II may be the least popular Star Wars film of all six. True, there is not a single original piece of dialouge, but everything else makes up for it. For example, the characters were verly likeable. I personally am a big fan of CGI creatures, since they can do more than puppets/muppets, which is why I absolutly love seeing the CGI Yoda whip out his lightsaber, and fight Dooku with it. Also, there was excellent quality of the images, but there was a shot or two where greenscreens were obvious. Finally, I just love a John Williams score. Doesn't evrybody? Bottom line, Star Wars Episode II is the least popular movie in the saga, but it's Star Wars, so we can forgive a let down.