The Badlanders

The Badlanders

Two men are released from the Arizona Territorial Prison at Yuma in 1898. One, the Dutchman, is out to get both gold and revenge from the people of a small mining town who had him imprisoned unjustly. The other, McBain, is just trying to go straight, but that is easier said than done once the Dutchman involves him in his gold theft scheme.

Two men are released from the Arizona Territorial Prison at Yuma in 1898. One, the Dutchman, is out to get both gold and revenge from the people of a small mining town who had him ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

The Badlanders torrent reviews

Juudd D (de) wrote: Second saddest film Ive watched since tears of the sun( with bruce willis), came by the film by mistake and was surprised at how good it was , and surprised that christian bale played in this , great film! True reality and sad ending

duvvine g (nl) wrote: this is an amazing movie I love it the day before yesterday it came on and ihad to go baby sit my cusins so I didn't get to watch it but I've watched it like million and hundreds all together I can remember every word like the back of my hand

Sachie F (nl) wrote: great performance by aish

Peyton C (fr) wrote: An unfunny comedy. This is only intended for rednecks and immature male audiences.

Chris M (ag) wrote: A slow, ghostly waltz of a movie, as free form as the verse that intersperses it... romantic, enigmatic and hopeful to the end.

Reuben K (ag) wrote: An exciting film with the grim reaper as the murderer, a different film from others, lost its reputation because of the un-needed sequels. Very good thrilling suspense film.

Eve C (jp) wrote: Putain que j'ai aim (C) ce film !

Chris C (mx) wrote: Very low budget 70's horror about five twisted psycho little kids on a killing spree. Smart little bastards they were... Some interesting scenes in this... don't want to spoil anything, but well worth a watch. *spoiler* Did they just throw piranhas in a bathtub with that chick?.... why, yes they did.

Edith N (it) wrote: In the End, Whose Side Are You On? You know, somebody yesterday indirectly said I wasn't a [i]real[/i] film buff, because I use Netflix, and it's only for people who want to watch recent blockbusters. It is, admittedly, true that I get a lot of the more obscure stuff I watch out of the library, and a lot of what I get from Netflix is older classics or otherwise things the library doesn't have. However, I have to point out to you that this review is the first user review in the system for this movie. That has been the case several times lately, one of the few interesting things from the new site being that they show you a few examples of what other people thought. (This has only added to my certainty that I'm one of the only people around here who really writes reviews more complicated than "OMG this was awesome!" So much for uniformity, huh, Rotten Tomatoes?) I admit that I turned off a couple of movies this morning before getting to this one--I turned off [i]In Her Shoes[/i] yesterday because of my fantasies of Cameron Diaz's character getting raped and murdered, too. So I'm not sure my choices have much to do with my film-buffitude. There was a point during World War II when the Germans had invaded Italy, and the Allies had not yet liberated it. Most Italian films about the war take place during this time, because we all know it's easier to make the Nazis villains. We like to ignore home-grown fascists. At any rate, Grimaldi (Vittorio De Sica) isn't a fascist. He isn't really much of anything. A compulsive gambler, really, chronically in debt and mooching off anyone he can. This entangles him with his local SS office. He pretends to be providing assistance to families who have come in search of a loved one in Nazi custody, but it's basically a con to pay off debts incurred when he gambled money entrusted to him by SS Colonel Mueller (Hannes Messemer). When he isn't quite successful at this, when Mueller discovers his con, Mueller gets him to substitute for Italian hero General Victorio Emanuele Bardone Della Rovere, who has been shot and killed but is eagerly awaited by the partisans. Having a General Della Rovere in place can be very helpful to them, and it will stop Grimaldi from being shipped off to Germany. Only of course it isn't that simple for Grimaldi. Everyone in prison wants to feel important to the general. One man eagerly asks if Della Rovere remembers the man's brother, who served as a signalman in Africa. The prisoners, mostly condemned to death, want to feel that they are remembered. They want to feel that their deaths will not be in vain, that there will be an Italy that remembers and honours them. The war will be over soon; even the Nazis know that by this point. Grimaldi must bear their hopes. In order to get the information he has been sent into the prison to get, he must inhabit the character of the general. It is, I think, difficult to do that without really learning what the person is about and probably starting to feel that, to feel how important it is. To feel the person's own wants and dreams and needs. If it is possible, it is not possible for Grimaldi. I like that this film doesn't slip into the Italians=good/Germans=bad false dichotomy. Grimaldi is a conman. He's a compulsive gambler. He gives his girlfriend a fake ring, and when she breaks up with him and gives it back--because she knows it's fake--he takes it to all the other people he can find in order to try to sell it to some other sucker. Hells, come to that, he was willing to go into the prison to find someone who was just fighting for Italy in the first place. On the other hand, when Mueller says he doesn't want to torture Bianchelli (Vittorio Caprioli), he really does mean it. It isn't a cinematic moustache twirl. He finds Bianchelli important to the smooth running of the prison--he's been in for three months on a death sentence, something Nazis were generally not, as a rule, hesitant to carry out, but he speculates he's still alive because they don't have another barber. He is actually angry at Grimaldi because of what his foolish actions set in motion. Rossellini is another one of those directors whose style I am not able to pick out of a series of clips. However, this is a very cleanly made film. There do not seem to be wasted shots. He does not work to make it pretty. It did strike me as odd that the prisoners would get the (relatively) comfy beds and the thick, warm blankets, but I don't know what an actual [i]prison[/i] in Italy under the Nazis was like. There is a shot here of people walking in the snow that, to me, feels like the shot in [i]Schindler's List[/i] where the Poles are walking through what looks like snow and, horrifyingly, is not. It would not surprise me to find out that it's intended to, that Spielberg was aware of this film. Rossellini also shows us an Italy with which we are not familiar. This Italy is not all sunny and warm and friendly. People forget, for example, that there is such thing as the Italian Alps. These people dealing with the snow are not like those in [i]Amarcord[/i], dealing with a freak event. This is something with which they are used to. Like they do with the Nazis, they must just deal with it.

Dorianator F (mx) wrote: Very entertaining movie. It's very good and sad at the same time.

Larry L (nl) wrote: It's good. Don't watch it.

Shane J (nl) wrote: Scott Adkins is one of the best action stars working in Hollywood today and whenever he collaborated with florentine you know one thing the action scenes are going to be out of this world!! This film is no different, you won't see much better action at your local cinema. Unfortunate unlike a few of the other films this doesn't really hold up in other departments. The acting is pretty terrible all round and by God the western style music will drive you up the wall after about 10 minutes (so pointless). The plots basic but does the job of tying all the action together. Worth a watch but don't expect to much