Freddie is an inept bank clerk with no future. His only hobby is collecting butterflies, which gives him a feeling of power and control that is otherwise totally missing from his life. He comes into a large sum of money, and buys himself a country house. Still unable to make himself at ease socially, he starts to plan on acquiring a girl friend - in the same manner as he collects butterflies. He prepares the cellar of the house to be a collecting jar, and stalks his victim over several days.
A man kidnaps a woman and holds her hostage just for the pleasure of having her there. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
The Collector torrent reviews
(de) wrote: I truly don't get the Oscar nod.
(nl) wrote: Night of the Living Dead: Resurrection is yet another remake of Romero's classic "Night of the Living Dead". Unlike previous remakes where at least one redeeming value could be found this one has none. It's a prime example of how not to make a horror film. Night of the Living Dead: Resurrection is about a family trapped in a house during a zombie apocalypse in Wales. From the start this film does everything in its power to make sure you hate it. Within the first twenty minutes the film switches from following a group of teenagers to following a concern husband with both set of characters solely created for filler. Neither of these characters play any kind of role latter on in the film. The first twenty of the film are pointless and serve no purpose other than to pad out the film above one hour. Once in the twenty minute mark the film central characters are introduced and make a poor first impression. Seeing a father and his oldest son lie to their family about killing an actual man is not a great introduction for our heroes. What occurs next is the thinnest and dumbest plot for any horror film possibly ever made. It uses a sub-genre cliche of families having trouble killing their love ones turning it into an entire film. If written better this cliche turned story could have explored some grey area topics like family members choosing the fate for their incurable suffering love ones. On occasions character bring up arguments whether or not to kill a love one, but these arguments only present one sided solutions. Doing the opposite clearly is not the answer with audiences regardless of their exposure to horror films can immediately map out what fate has in store for each individual character. None of the characters are sympathetic by any means. One of the survivors is a married man who has no problem cheating on his ill wife with her sister seconds after she gets bitten by a zombie. Now where this remake fails beyond comprehension and strays away from good taste is the final words the film chooses to end with. The final line said in the film is "Put her in the rape van". Out of context it's leaves a bad taste in your mouth and deemed unfair to hold it against it, but in context it's even more tasteless. A lone survivor makes it through the whole zombie/human attack ordeal and this character (along everyone else) was poorly written. This character only major development is she had sex with her sister husband several times. In no way, shape, or form is this character given any redeemable qualities. This whole "rape van" ending is cheaply use to make us sympathize for a character with nothing to like. For a film titled "Night of the Living Dead: Resurrection" the living do more harm than the undead. Unaffected humans kill more people in this film than the undead. The undead rarely makes an appearance even disregarding basic knowledge of the spread of disease (apparently if you just clean your zombie bite with water you're cure). Because of little zombies it has a low budget feel it could never detach itself from. The cinematography is grainy with lighting too dark making it difficult to see what's on screen. Special effects so cheap looking salsa would make for better blood effect than anything this film has to offer. As for acting it's nonexistent. These "actors" awkwardly spout lines of dialogue, have no chemistry, and never feel comfortable doing any action. Night of the Living Dead: Resurrection has too little plot, too little zombie, and too many inexperience filmmakers incapable to overcome their limitations. It won't entertain fans of the original, fans of horror film will hate it as well falling below a generic zombie film, and for the average viewer it gets nothing right in any area.
(ca) wrote: Daring and a sensual topic on education directed by Prakash Jha is truly visionary and entertaining by all means with the great charismatic presence of Big B. Bravo
(ag) wrote: While it offers nothing new or exceptional to the franchise. Final destination 5 is somewhat of a step back in the right direction, as it's made with a much steadier hand and uses it's 3D effects to creative usage.
(de) wrote: Started watching it. thought the frames and story were very very familiar. Realised it was a perfect remake of the Italian classic I soliti ignoti with Marcello Mastroianni. Was not impressed after that. stopped watching.
(fr) wrote: I guarantee that no one else has seen this. A cliched pool movie with a Guy Ritchie type twist. I enjoyed it.
(fr) wrote: This is not a great movie, but boy is it creative. The songs are just abysmal though.
(nl) wrote: I watched Less Than Zero mistakenly when I was 13. Compelled to watch it again, I did, and this time around I noticed the abundant flaws but really enjoyed Robert Downey Jr's performance.
(it) wrote: Clint Eastwood is a very talented director there's no question but here it seems like there needs to be some more chills in the processanother tale of obsession and a psychotic state of mind that turns menacingJessica Walter plays the role of Evelyn so wickedly as Dave's most recent flame constantly calling him up asking to play her fav song, be around him, and makes him believe they share feelings for one anotherI suppose from a certain point of view its his own fault since he rotates from one person to the next without establishing where he is in terms of romance but Evelyn doesn't take so kindly to itonly a couple of shock moments here and there and the rest of the film just relies on Dave's love life and very little horror actually going onI was just expecting Clint to give me actual joltstoo much drama, not enough thrills
(gb) wrote: El documental sigue durante 3 aos a un asistente social trabajando en asilos de ancianos en USA. Su gracia es que intenta traer a flote recuerdos perdidos en gente con demencia senil al utilizar msica que esa gente am hace muchos aos. Y caramba que lo logra. El docu es de una belleza enorme al mostrar el florecer de caras inicialmente marchitas. Es una prueba del poder curativo de la msica, y se plantea como un tratamiento alternativo (complementario) al Alzheimer. Muchas reacciones distintas (sonrisas, canto, palabras de gente que no hablaba, recuerdos), pero todas positivas. Quizs se omitieron casos en que no pas nada al aplicar msica, pero lo ms importante es la esperanza de una vida ms digna en los casos en que si funcion. Hermoso.Mas all de la demencia senil, el documental tb habla en general de la msica. De como somos seres como predeterminados para la msica, a diferencia de otros animales. No hay otra actividad que ponga a funcionar tantas partes del cerebro al mismo tiempo como la msica (he ah la explicacin a pq es tan beneficioso usarla como terapia en este caso). Personalmente, la msica es el amor de mi vida, por eso encontr tan lindo el docu, por como celebra su importancia para los seres humanos. Sin msica somos seres incompletos :)
(ag) wrote: Engaging, poor voices across the board.
(ag) wrote: Love it and good for the whole family!!