The Divine Move
Professional baduk (go) player Tae-seok loses a high-stakes game to infamous underground gambler Sal-soo, and ends up framed for the murder of his own brother and locked up in prison. He vows revenge and trains ferociously. After serving his seven-year sentence, he gets in touch with his brother's former associate "Tricks," hermit and blind master player "The Lord," and skillful junkyard owner Mok-su; together, they begin formulating a plan to get back at Sal-soo and his men. Tae-seok slowly penetrates Sal-soo's inner circle and his gambling joint, and eliminates Sal-soo's men one by one. But Sal-soo discovers Tae-seok's true identity and engages him in one final game that will seal the fates of the two men involved.
- Category:Drama, Crime
- Stars:Kil-Kang Ahn, Sung-kee Ahn, Jin-Hyeok Choi, Woo-sung Jung, In-kwon Kim, Beom-su Lee, Si-young Lee, Choi Jin-Hyuk,
- Country:South Korea
- Director:Beom-gu Cho,
- Writer:Sung-Hyub Yu
Tae-Suk and two associates run a scam during a high stakes game of go. The game goes horribly wrong, with the outcome resulting in the murder of his own brother. Meanwhile, Tae-Suk is framed for the death and is sentenced to prison for 7 years. Then he schemes to inflict maximum pain upon the criminals that killed his brother. He must first master the game of go and also learn to kill with his fists. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
The Divine Move torrent reviews
(nl) wrote: OMG IVE ALREADY WATCHED AND IT IS AWESOME
(de) wrote: Fascinating. After having been so involved with the election in 2004, it's interesting to revisit, while examining each party's strategies, victories and defeats. Very even-handed, and detailed. Something everyone interested in politics should see going into the 2008 election.
(us) wrote: To me, [Time To Leave] perhaps is the greatest motion picture Francois Ozon has ever made, so far. Ozon is clever enough not to put this movie into the melodrama category. Romain- a cocky, egoistic, dyeing man chooses to hide his diagnosis from his family & his other half, except his aged grandmother (who is facing death as well); he tries to understand death before dying; meantime he also tries replenishing the cracking relationships surrounding during his numbered days- regardless it turns out to be working or not eventually. The ending sunset scene is subtle but way too sentimental & enchanting.
(nl) wrote: With Snakes on a Plane becoming a notorious internet phenomenon, its popularity was too much to pass up.Snakes on a Plane is a film with nothing in disguise. Its title promises a blatantly obvious generic contract, and within a few minutes of the film viewers witness clear product placement and a story that cuts straight to the point. What becomes apparent very soon is the fact that David R. Ellis' intentions for Snakes on a Plane is for it to succeed as both a legitimate disaster film and a parody of one. One of the most surprising things about the film is the fact that Snakes on a Plane successfully finds a balance between these two elements.Snakes on a Plane has a genuine scary story to it, even though the internal logic and genuine notion of it all is rather ridiculous. The film's convergence of the creature feature genre with a story much like the one from Airport (1970) gives it two major hooks for tension, yet it does not take that path singularly. In actual fact, the film is lighthearted in nature and always maintains a sense of humour about what its doing. The film is proudly absurd with all of its ridiculous plot dynamics and self-parody humour which makes it difficult to be genuinely scared by the experience, but instead it allows the film to be a genuinely fun experience. The characters in Snakes on a Plane are clearly all parodies of archetypes from disaster movies and the actors who portray them are all very cheesy in their attempts, adding clear-cut humourous intentions to the film. The feature works as a proud self-parody which means that it knows its limitations and works with them, and the experience is ultimately fun.Ensuring that it lives up to a sufficient number of cliches to match its intentionally generic nature, Snakes on a Plane begins by giving viewers a background to the two main characters and the reason behind the disaster as well as taking some brief moments to characterize many of the archetypes that are entering flight with them. Aside from that, the film doesn't attempt to build a plot, it simply pulls snakes out and then throws them at viewers repeatedly the whole time. A lot of viewers are likely to consider this too repetitive for its own good particularly if they cannot embrace the absurdist nature of the film, but those who acknowledge the title of the film when going in to see it can know what to expect. The thing about a good disaster film is that it primarily needs two things: good visual effects and a creative collection of ways to show them off. In Snakes on a Plane, the visual effects are fairly good though not groundbreaking, and the way they are used delivers precisely what fans would be hoping for. Snakes on a Plane gleefully throws an never ending flurry of disaster movie cliches, cheesy dialogue and blood at the viewer. The blood is the element which is clearly in the highest demand, and David R. Ellis works hard to live up to that. As a result, he casts a collection of real snakes and CGI snakes out to attack all the characters in a collection of creative ways. They sneak in from all different places and bite characters in the most unconventional locations, giving the film an effective exploitation nature which never ends up going too heavy. There is an effective balance between genuine horror and deadpan comedy in Snakes on a Plane so that its a fun and easy experience to watch without taking away from the intense nature of the horror themes. The concept itself is fairly laughable, and Snakes on a Plane takes that notion and runs with it so that it can be a legitimate disaster film and a parody of one at the same time.And between the scenes of snakes attacking everything in sight, the cast in Snakes on a Plane manage to make the cliche script work to a comic benefit.Samuel L. Jackson is the primary non-snake gimmick to carry Snakes on a Plane to the end. Anyone can tell you that one of the greatest moments in the film is when he delivers the line "Enough is enough. I have had it with these motherf*cken snakes on this motherf*cken plane" because it is the endeavour of the over-the-top energy he has spent the entire film building up. While everyone around him puts in cheesy efforts, Samuel L. Jackson is the one actor bent on taking the film seriously. As a result, he unleashes a hilarious epitome of all his most stereotypical traits amalgamated into a single effort. He delivers the dramatic material with a hard-hitting attitude and a determination to really make the tension of the film a reality for the character Neville Flynn while proudly shouting with every inch of spirit he's gotBobby Cannavale also manages to deliver a firm dramatic effort in his small appearance.When it comes to the actors who deliver the B-movie spirit to the feature, the standout is Nathan Phillips. The Australian actor who made a name for himself in Wolf Creek brings his charms to American audiences, even if they come in the form of monotonously milking his native accent. He has a handsome athletic appeal to him which effectively supplies the masculine edge to the film and the physical energy to keep up with the many intense plot dynamics that get thrown at him as the film goes on. Nathan Phillips' thin facade of masculinity sets him up as an ideal one-dimensional protagonist and he works well alongside Samuel L. Jackson.And the comic touch of David Koechner and especially Kenan Thompson breathe some light energy into the comic side of the filmSo for better and for worse, Snakes on a Plane lives up to its title and delivers a large flurry of snake attacks and plenty of blood with lighthearted comic undertones at the helm of the cheesy script and cast, led in a solid effort by Samuel L. Jackson.
(br) wrote: There was a good film here, somewhere. What made it to the screen, however, was not. Eckhart, whom I normally enjoy, was not good at all. Moss had very little to do except ride Eckhart hard and then console him when he suddenly tells her he loves her. Kingsley does a pretty decent job being the over-the-top villain (or one of them, anyway).There isn't enough backstory, the jumps between scenes are jarring and seem to be missing transitional information, and the lead characters don't really have anything story-driven to explain why they are acting the way they are. The photography in places is quite nicely done, however.The whole things winds up trying to be Se7en, but fails each step of the way. Knowing some of the work Zak Penn has done since, my guess is that the direction and/or the editing is what fails this movie.(V)
(jp) wrote: The self-depricating British humor is always funny to me. There's enough of that in this film to satisfy any good anglophile. It also works as a romantic comedy and this is a genre I typically ignore. Add in that I've been a frequent visitor to Notting Hill and it's easy to see why I'm biased. Remember when Roberts and Grant could create good chemistry with anyone?
(it) wrote: If bad acting doesn't drive you insane watch this one. This is not the best movie out there, but there was something about it that I did enjoy. At points it amused me and at others I found it absolutely absurd, however if you are interested in lesbian cinema I think you should watch it. I wish I had seen it years ago.
(jp) wrote: Let's be honest, if you have seen 1 Paranormal Activity movie, then you have pretty much seen them all.