The Errand of Angels

The Errand of Angels

Sister Rachel Taylor of Boise, Idaho is an eager young missionary of the LDS Church who has been sent on an 18-month long mission to Austria. Rachel finds herself having a hard time adjusting to her new cultural surroundings in the foreign country. Due to differences in opinion, she is also unable to get along with the companion missionary that was assigned to her by the church.

A wide-eyed sister missionary arrives in Austria to begin her 18-month-long mission for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Despite having to make a few cultural adjustments, ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


The Errand of Angels torrent reviews

William R (de) wrote: Mostly for fans of the show, this didn't do it for me but good enough for what it is

Christopher B (au) wrote: This was ok. Straight to dvd quality.

Marc L (ca) wrote: Si le principe general de ce thriller fantastique entretient un lointain air de famille avec les films d'horreur mettant en scene Freddie Krueger, Nightmare detective ne developpe pas du tout le meme esprit que cette serie potache. Glauque, hyper violent et devoilant quelques scenes rellement angoissantes, Nightmare detective joue sur les mecanismes de la pulsion suicidaire presente en chaque individu. Dommage que le scenario prenne parfois des detours tortueux car cette alternance incertaine entre realite et onirisme dote le film d'une atmosphere tres particuliere et atypique.

Miranda W (de) wrote: This is an amazing movie!!!!

Gordon R (ru) wrote: Gambler finds a girl in this tiring drama.

jenna s (ag) wrote: I love the musical, and I love the movie! The soundtrack is strong as well as the acting and storyline. This is an amazing film adaption of a musical that other movie musical should try to aspire to be like.

Alex (fr) wrote: This was a good weee movie. Sutherland was great as mild-mannered hit man Arthur Banks, trying to do his latest job, when he comes across Bennie, who's running from her husband.Not to go into detail, the plot was good, kinda weird and I loved the patter, too lol:P

Caleb C (mx) wrote: The cover of this film makes me laugh. It really applies to the film in a way, but it also makes it look like a movie that is intended just for girls or homosexuals, no offence here at all. Either way, this is one of those films that is indeed for everyone who loves great films. The characters and situations here are very tender hearted. A lot of heart went into this film. Matthew Broderick and Christopher Walken are great here as well as the supporting cast. Never a dull moment with this one. Worth a look if you can find it.

Gregory W (br) wrote: though historical;ly inaccurate still worth watching.

E R (gb) wrote: plot is sub par, but it's got some shock value. I mainly enjoyed it because I love every one of the actors.

Hugh R (es) wrote: Quickie Review:Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert once gave this movie two enthusiastic thumbs up. But if you go back and watch their review you'll notice they avoid talking about the script, editing, and story and focus solely on the visuals. Well, there's a reason for that.I'm sorry, but with all due respect to the immensely talented and sorely missed Siskel, Ebert, and Williams, this movie is awful. It is visually stunning and so very creative, but that does not make it a good MOVIE. Not in this form. It has some interesting ideas, but the finished product fails to deliver on nearly every one of them, taking easy outs and weakly wrapping it all in a pretty bow. It groans under its own self importance and lacks the muscle to hold it all in place. When I watched it recently I was astounded to find that the picture I once held in such high regard when I was a teenager was actually a jumbled mess rife with cornball cliches barely hidden beneath a thin veneer of pretty eye-candy. The editing was atrocious, the story was a first draft amateur mess that excused its flaws by barely being one step above "it's all just a dream." The only redeeming factors are the visuals and Williams' acting. He owned every frame, every moment. But let's be honest here, you could get the most talented actor in the world to play out an episode of Honey Boo Boo and that wouldn't make it Shakespeare.Individual scenes, when taken alone and out of context of the movie, are brilliant. As short films in an anthology they may have worked, but strung together the way they were and paced the way they were they come across less like an actual movie and more like someone trying to trick the audience into mistaking a high school student's short story as an epic masterpiece.In the end, the reason this movie was most hard to watch was to see such effort, such craft, being wasted on such a terrible screenplay and burdened by the director's misguided need to play at making an "art house picture."

V W (au) wrote: Definitely worth watching! Quirky, dramatic, funny - and Kate! What more could one ask for?