The Flesh of the Orchid

The Flesh of the Orchid

A disturbed young woman is kept prisoner in a castle by her aunt for her money. The game-keeper, her guardian, tries to rape her but she escapes. In her flight she meets a man also running ...

A disturbed young woman is kept prisoner in a castle by her aunt for her money. The game-keeper, her guardian, tries to rape her but she escapes. In her flight she meets a man also running ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


The Flesh of the Orchid torrent reviews

Trinity C (gb) wrote: Low budget horror rocks

Krista B (br) wrote: Standard slasher fluff that only stands out because of Michael Berryman and Jeffrey Combs. Not bad, but not especially great either. Check it out if you're a fan of the genre or the actors, but otherwise there's not much to see.

Marie R (gb) wrote: trop beau et trop triste

Kendall I (ca) wrote: This 80's horror flick was a pretty creepy little tale, but nothing to get too excited about. There were a few key moments that stood out from the rest. The movie wasn't bad, but just kind of bland.PLOT:Frankie Scarlatti (Lukas Haas) is a strange student at his school. One Halloween night, a couple of boys lock him in the coat closet at school where he witnesses a ghost girl reenact the way she was murdered before Frankie himself is encountered by a violent being. After this night, strange things start happening to Frankie, including visits by the ghost girl and clues left by her to help him solve the mystery of her murder. Frankie, now interested by the mystery of the girl, starts to try and find her killer and the connection with her and the ghost of the mysterious lady in white. It's a pretty good plot executed decently.ACTING:The performances in here weren't too good. They weren't completely terrible, but at times the acting seemed near laughable. Lukas Haas did a decent job of young Frankie Scarlatti, as did Angelo Bertolini and Renata Vanni as Papa Charlie and Mama Assunta. Not all the performances were too well done, like that of Len Cariou as Phil. His acting wasn't too convincing to me, for his facial expressions didn't seem to accurately match his emotions. There really weren't any really good performances, but the other shiners would have to be Joelle Jacob as Melissa and Frank LaLoggia as adult Frankie.SCORE:The score in this movie was actually pretty generic horror score, but it got the job done and added a bit of a distinct theme to the movie itself.EFFECTS:The effects were about as cheap and cheesy as any effects were in the eighties. However, the effects seemed to add more color and they made the ghosts look a bit more realistic than they do nowadays. I appreciate that much about ghost movies in the past; the effects look decently realistic.OTHER CONTENT:This movie wasn't too well made, but it wasn't terrible either. Aside from the acting, this movie overall was just cheesy and predictable. I saw most of the twists coming. However, this movie did have a few key scenes that were either shot well or actually fairly unpredictable. There were only a few of these scenes that gave me a bit of admiration for this movie. There were a few scares that did manage to appear creepy or catch me off guard. This movie could have been so much better, but it was done well to at least a minimalist point.OVERALL,a neutral horror movie with a decent plot, unconvincing acting, generic horror score, cheap but sort of realistic effects, cheesiness and predictability, and a few key scenes shot well with decent scares.

Guilherme N (it) wrote: Some masterpieces make you suffer. Ingrid Bergman enters here definitively in the history of cinema - she's just wonderful.

Daniel A (mx) wrote: Surprisingly good. PG-13

Abel D (ag) wrote: Somehow even sillier & crasser than its predecessor, Ace Ventura 2 is not without a few hearty laughs, even if it's more pandering. Once again, the mania of Carrey as the manic pet detective goes a long way to making a lot of slapstick and sometimes tasteless gags actually playful and zany.

Noah A (es) wrote: A very Underrated movie of the original franchise. B

Thomas B (br) wrote: ***It's a lot of good silly fun, and it's nice to see Mel Gibson back, because even if he's an absolute maniac in real life, he's a great actor.

Mohammad A (br) wrote: i like this film and i wish i can see it because it is wonderful film and i like this kind of films