The Hypnotized

The Hypnotized

A psychiatrist fails to help a mental patient during her stay in hospital. The doctor becomes obsessed with his former patient, seeks her on the outside and uses hypnosis to fulfill his sexual desires.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:104 minutes
  • Release:2004
  • Language:Korean
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:leopard,   torture,   bible,  

A psychiatrist fails to help a mental patient during her stay in hospital. The doctor becomes obsessed with his former patient, seeks her on the outside and uses hypnosis to fulfill his sexual desires. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

The Hypnotized torrent reviews

Keldon M (de) wrote: I saw about 15 minutes of this mess. It was an awful.

Rob H (fr) wrote: good stand-up material from the funniest of the Blue Collar comedians

Claire B (us) wrote: I really enjoyed this film, although the cover doesn't do anything to entice viewers. Eddie Spears' amazing stank face was present and accounted for as usual (and I love it). This movie is about a really terrible highschool basketball team that gets a new coach who turns everything around for them, sending the team to the state championship. Of course, its mainly a character driven story but it did have my heart pounding in suspense at the end. As is common in Native films, it really would have benefited from a bigger budget and some tweaks to the script and casting, but for the most part, they got it right, and that's what makes it worth watching.

Spencer M (ru) wrote: Put on a show, Christian.

LeighAnne W (gb) wrote: My FAVORITE Christian Slater movie!!!

Scott A (ru) wrote: The first half can be brutal at times, with Modine some of the worst acting and the fact his character seems to keep making the worst choices time and time again. Metcalf also plays maybe the most worthless lawyer ever.Griffith is really solid here, and Keaton can be, but he isn't used enough to be totally menacing. He is missing a lot from the first half.I think once Grittith goes out to solve the mystery on her own the film gets really good, and then it has the cliched ending.If you can get past Modine's bad acting it's not a bad little thriller, and a good one to see if you are thinking of renting out rooms!!!

Ryan V (nl) wrote: Rudy Ray Moore, who made this film with little more than sheer force of will, plays the jive-talking, ass-whupping, and love-making titular pimp. Dolemite is on a mission to take revenge on the men who wrongly threw him into jail two years ago. His story is told with crappy lighting, poor sound editing, hilariously inept fight scenes, and cinematography so amateurish that nobody (except the audience) seems to notice that the boom mics keep drifting into frame. This wish fulfillment fantasy, often cited as the most notorious of the blaxploitation films, is such a force of bravado that it all but completely personifies the concept of "so bad it's good".

Jesse R (ag) wrote: Mothra makes its debut in this film, which launches several films that feature Mothra.

Paul F (gb) wrote: (This is an old review, but I'm going to start transcribing stuff from the website I was doing reviews for five years ago. It's just to keep them in one place. Consider this "Paul Classic" or something.) [b][color=#ffffff] Kid?s movies can generally get weird enough so that it?s not that hard to see how Matilda got made. I mean, [i]The Garbage Pail Kids Movie[/i] got made. [i]Kazaam[/i] got made. The Mexican [i]Santa Claus[/i] flick got made. So it?s not completely inconceivable that someone just walked into a producer?s office, said ?I want to make a G-rated movie with Elliott Gould and a boxing kangaroo,? and the producer, so high on coke that he was having visions of Gould right then and there, agreed to it.[/color][/b] [b][color=#ffffff] Hence, [i]Matilda[/i]. As far as I know, the first and only movie in which a mob boss hires an assassin to take out a kangaroo?s tail. Thank God.[/color][/b][b][color=#ffffff][/color][/b] [b][color=#ffffff] Now there are certain casting errors in movies that clearly make no sense and you wonder how the hell they got into the final cut of the picture without anyone getting up and saying, ?You know, guys, this is a really terrible idea.? Charleton Heston playing a Mexican in [i]Touch of Evil[/i]. Mickey Rooney?s ?Miss Go-wightwy!? screeching in [i]Breakfast at Tiffany?s[/i]. Keanu Reeves as a nuclear physicist in [i]Chain Reaction[/i]. Christopher Walken playing a human being.[/color][/b][b][color=#ffffff][/color][/b] [b][color=#ffffff] On top of all of these, more than John Wayne as Genghis Kahn or the illiterate Demi Moore as Hester Pym, is one little bit of casting in [i]Matilda[/i]. You see, Matilda is a kangaroo. And yet, Matilda is not played by a kangaroo. Matilda is played by a man in a kangaroo suit.[/color][/b][b][color=#ffffff][/color][/b] [b][color=#ffffff] Okay, so the casting of humans in animal suits isn?t really all that new or shocking. After all, most gorillas in movies were played by humans before they were replaced by computers. But [i]Matilda[/i]?s kangaroo suit is unusual in one respect. It is, clearly and simply, the most unconvincing, unbelievable animal suit ever made for a major motion picture.[/color][/b][b][color=#ffffff][/color][/b] [b][color=#ffffff] The plot is crap, of course. A washed-up Irish boxer (Clive Revill) with a pet kangaroo (some guy) meet up with talent agent Elliott Gould. Gould needs a hit, and gets the idea to turn Matilda into a boxing champ. Due to some Gouldian trickery, Matilda quickly makes his way up to being a champion, and the flick climaxes with a battle for the Heavyweight championship of the world. Meanwhile, bad guy mobster Uncle Nono (Harry Guardino) wants a piece of the action, and a sports columnist (Robert Mitchum, looking terribly embarrassed) investigates.[/color][/b][b][color=#ffffff][/color][/b] [b][color=#ffffff] It?s the usual barrage of dumb gags (?He?s herbivorous!? ?I don?t care where he comes from!? Ha. Ha. Hah.) and Gould trying to be cute, and it wouldn?t have been any good even if there was a real ?roo behind the punches. But the suit sinks it to Ed Wood levels of ineptitude. Just watching the boxing sequences, with the human combatants dully flying out of the way of the roo?s punches, the furry fighter?s dead, black eyes and forced, awkward hops around the ring getting cheered on by audiences? this is cinema at its? purest.[/color][/b][b][color=#ffffff][/color][/b] [b][color=#ffffff] It?s clear that the makers of this film knew how unconvincing the whole thing is, simply because no character brings attention to the fact that Matilda looks more like a guy in a brown rabbit suit than an Australian hopper. In normal animals-play-sports flicks, there?s at least some character that theorizes that it?s a guy in a costume. Not here. Everyone?s completely convinced. That is, except the audience.[/color][/b][b][color=#ffffff][/color][/b] [b][color=#ffffff] To be fair, the costume does allow for some movement, and the phony pouch-packer can blink and move its? ears. But the fur looks like it was stripped from a cheap rug, and the eyes... oh, those haunting, creepy, cold eyes. Words don?t do them justice.[/color][/b][b][color=#ffffff][/color][/b] [b][color=#ffffff] As a special bonus, you also get ?Hee-Haw??s Bob Clark as the state boxing commissioner. At the end of the film, Revill tells the audience what?s happened to all the characters and presents Gould (and his family) was a li?l baby kangaroo. It is played by a real kangaroo. So the film does, in fact, feature a real-life kanga. But it sure as hell isn?t Matilda.[/color][/b][b][color=#ffffff][/color][/b] [b][color=#ffffff] It's no wonder that this was one of the movies that killed American International Pictures, already nearing their casket in 1978, and only managing to churn out a couple more pics before becoming the similarly-doomed Orion.[/color][/b][b][color=#ffffff][/color][/b] [b][color=#ffffff] (If you need another reason to run screaming from [i]Matilda[/i], here it is: The theme song is by Pat and Debby Boone. You have been warned.)[/color][/b]

James L (br) wrote: Yes it's interesting, and yes it does get you thinking, but did it grip me, I'm afraid not.

ALLAN F (es) wrote: NOT THE BEST MOVIE I EVER SAW. BUT LUNDGREN HAS A COOL GUN !! AND GINA BELLMAN ANT BAD TO.

Sexten S (fr) wrote: We are supposed to believe that Cillian Murphy is Jennifer Connelly's son?????