The Man with One Red Shoe

The Man with One Red Shoe

A man is mistaken as a spy by the CIA when he arrives at the airport with one red shoe.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:92 minutes
  • Release:1985
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:religion,   spy,   shoe,  

A man picked randomly out of a crowd is made the target of CIA survelliance and pursuit. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


The Man with One Red Shoe torrent reviews

Paul W (ag) wrote: Like an oasis in the desert, love blooms in a brothel - you have to hand it to the team that made this fine film.

Melvin W (us) wrote: "Ambition Charm Delusion"Calvin Marshall is the name of the movie and of the lead character. Calvin has high hopes of being a baseball superstar, but he can't even play for a little Junior College team. The coach let's him hang around though because he doesn't have the heart to tell Calvin that he just doesn't have any talent.This is by no means a great movie. It's an average one at best, but it has a lot of likable qualities. First, all of the characters are likable. Calvin is a hard working and nice kid who loves baseball. The girl he likes Tori is a beautiful, charming, and nice star volleyball player, who is going through a tough time. Coach Little, played really well by Steve Zahn, is a hard ass on the field with his players and a drunk off the field. But we see what he's really like when he talks to Calvin. He may not admit it, but he likes having Calvin around.Overall I enjoyed watching Calvin Marshall. It's not a movie that you feel the need to see more than once. It doesn't have a star-studded cast. It's not a big budget comedy with tons of laughs. It's just a charming little Indie Drama/Comedy that has a heart and is easy to like. If you need to kill an hour and a half, it's not too bad. If you never see it, well, that wouldn't be to big a deal.

Edison H (mx) wrote: Entretenida aunque la animacion es mediocre.

Rachel R (br) wrote: awesome movie and the manga one awesome

Kristof V (us) wrote: Absolutely one of my favo darkish movies to fall asleep with, without sound, when I'm very very tired. Story: pure crap. The rate of twists is impossible to comprehend.

KJ P (jp) wrote: Independent cinema can range from a student film with not a single dollar to its budget, to an Oscar-nominated film worth 40-50 million dollars. As long as its not backed by one of the wide distributors worldwide, its technically an indie film. That being said, Beginners is about as indie as indie gets when comparing it to some of the wider releases. While this is not a difficult film to sit through, it may not appeal to everyone. Independent films have always been able to tell simpler and more bizarre stories, due to the fact that they are not relying on a big box office return in order to make their film. This is a sweet 100 minute film about life and accepting certain things throughout it. Released back in 2010, there is a reason it didn't win too many awards, but that doesn't take away from the fact that I believe it to be a very enjoyable piece of filmmaking. If you are a fan of cinema and have yet to see Beginners, here is why I think it's worth your time. Following Oliver, a 38-year-old man who is living with a recently tortured past, as he falls in love one more time, the film begins to explore what has given him such grief over the past few years. Having his mother pass away after being married to his father for over 45 years, to then find out his father had actually been gay the entire time, to having to accept him falling for another man, to then having to take care of him as he passed away four years later, Ewan McGregor delivers a wonderfully sincere performance here. In a film that desperately needs its leading man to deliver the goods, McGregor was perfect casting decision. This film deals with a lot of heartbreak, but that's life, right? Unlike films like Blue Valentine or the recent Manchester by the Sea (films with hardly any levity), the romantic aspect is truly the only thing giving life to this saddening premise. Beginners is a very heartfelt story about to unlikely people falling in love, while the past is looming over them like a bad disease. It's definitely not a film that warrants many viewings, but it's a nice treat for independent film fans. To me, in order to balance a film perfectly, there has to be an even amount of happy to go along with the sad. This film does that in spades, which is why I enjoyed it so much. That being said, the main issue I have with this film is in its simplicity. Sure, some people may find the fact that a 75-year-old man falling in love with a 35-year-old man to be risky territory, but if you are willing to explore an aspect like that, why not go for it? Their relationship is not explored enough in my opinion, leaving little to no impact on me for the future setting of this film. Flashing back and forth through time to show how our main character got to be where he is, I found the present day more interesting than the past, due to the fact that the interesting portions of the past feel incomplete and not fleshed out enough. Beginners is a very ambitious film in the way it tells its story, but fails to impress all that much. In the end, Beginners is a very important story that more people need to see. It went under the radar upon release and I believe quite a few people missed it. Without much awards consideration, it still accumulated quite a few positive reviews. I think this is a very solid film worth checking out. With great writing for each character on-screen, some fine directing, and a premise that takes a few chances (even though not nearly enough), this is s piece of cinema worth checking out. I don't see myself ever coming to love this film in the future, but I would definitely consider a few viewings to revisit these likeable characters. Beginners is a solid watch.

Carlos T (ca) wrote: Albeit, a slight disappointment from the marvellous Ms Emma Thompson, however a failure it is not. Strong performances from this glittering cast sparkled through the 108 minutes leaving you in awe of its cast.Effie Gray tells the misfortunate true story of her relationship with Art critic, John Ruskin. There relationship enters turmoil after Ruskin refuses to share intimacy with his new wife. Also, under the influence of Ruskins mother (Julie Walters), the new Mrs John Ruskin is forced to find solace in characters such as Lady Eastlake (Thompson). With the strength found in herself and support of her friends and sister, she becomes on of the first women in history to seek annulment making this a great feminist tale of love, loss and freedom.Effie Grays pacing at times can come across as a little slow for it can drag during parts of this film. Thompson's screenplay, not her best but still watchable. The intensity of the emotional feelings of Effie Gray are shown conspicuously thorough out providing one Fanning's best roles to date.Overall, this is no masterpiece but is definitely still worth a try if you're into period drama.

Muffin M (nl) wrote: I own this on DVD and Blu-Ray