The Pawnbroker

The Pawnbroker

A Jewish pawnbroker, a victim of Nazi persecution, loses all faith in his fellow man until he realizes too late the tragedy of his actions.

The film goes inside the life of Sol Nazerman is a survivor from Nazi persecution undergoes terrible days by din of losing his family and friends in the war. He seems to be desperate of the truth and always be obsessed by daydreams from the horrible period in the past. Ultimately, Does he realize the tragedy of his actions? . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


The Pawnbroker torrent reviews

Tim K (ag) wrote: Surprised me...not as much as May, but it surprised me. Doesn't really know where it is going, but it had its moments.

Terri H (es) wrote: No thanks - Not interested

Khadija D (gb) wrote: Yes Boss is a cute,funny movie!!!

Alexander B (jp) wrote: Based on Bruce Springsteen's "Highway Patrolman, "Indian Runner" is a solid family melodrama that flew under the cinematic radar back in 1991. David Morse is a very underrated actor. Vigo Mortensen and Charles Bronson are terrific as well in Sean Penn's first outing as a director.

Jerrod Y (gb) wrote: Great childhood movie, I was surprised to find this on dvd!, I forgot all about it until I came across it while searching for something else, then I seen the cover, "wait! I've seen that!"...I don't think I've seen part 2, which I should've since it's from the 90's.

Jesse O (au) wrote: Tom Hanks is a fucking national treasure. That's just the way it is, as this is fact, it's not a matter of opinion or up to debate. If you disagree with me, you are DB Cooper, the Zodiac killer and a yellow terrorist communist who works for ISIS. You're, basically, the worst person on earth. Seriously though, I do love me some Tom Hanks. I don't think he really gets enough credit for being a truly tremendous comedic actor. This is probably a result of the fact that, outside of a few films, Hanks has pretty much stuck to more dramatic roles since he made the transition to serious actor in the 90s. He's obviously still done comedies here and there, Sleepless in Seattle, You've Got Mail and The Ladykillers come to mind, but, other than the latter, none of those films really compare to his 80s output, at least in terms of the manic comedic performances he gave in, say, The Money Pit (which was a great performance). But I digress, I don't really remember seeing Big in its entirety. Much like a lot of these classic 80s movies, or many movies for that matter, I remember catching glimpses of it here and there on TV, but I never actually sat down and watched it for good. Not a big fan of watching movies on cable TV, unless it's an HBO-type channel, simply cause of the fact that they're edited down and commercials. And when I watch a movie, I like to watch it as it was intended or, at the very least, since several directors have released their preferred cuts of their films on DVD, as it was when it first came out in theaters. Anyway, I finally got the chance to watch this in one sitting and I don't know what I think of this. It's certainly a good movie, but is it a very good movie? I don't know, I'll come to that determination as I write out this review. If I'm being honest, this is one of those movies that I probably would have enjoyed more closer to when it was released. But this movie was released the first day of 1988 and I was born in February, so there you go. You know what I mean. Part of me feels that this is just another one of those movies that time has played its wicked game on. It's certainly a good movie to watch, even to this day, but I think its impact has sort of lessened the more time has passed. And not to mention the fact that, to this day, the romance between Susan and Josh just feels so fucking odd and, honestly, kinda wrong. I get the whole idea, Susan has no idea that Josh was a 13-year-old boy stuck in a 31-year-old man's body (Hanks' age at the time of this film's release). But it's still so odd seeing it. It's a whole coming-of-age story, that's for damn sure. At the very least, the romance between Josh and Susan, for 80s rom-com standards, feels more believable than, say, the romance between the leads in Mannequin. Susan is fed up with the whole stuffy executive types and Josh, who behaves pretty much like a man-child, who plays around isn't afraid to get silly, is appealing to Susan. At least that part of the movie worked. What I felt didn't work was how Josh got to be big in the first place. He went to this carnival and he couldn't get on the ride because he was too small. Therefore he made a wish, at this Zoltar machine, that he wanted to be big. I realize that he's a kid, but I'd have liked there to have been more of a reason for him to wanna make this wish. I guess you could say that he could also date his crush if he was big, but they don't really make that obvious as one of the reasons why he made this wish. It doesn't really matter, in the long run, all that matters is turning Josh into an adult. This is, obviously, when the movie certainly picks up. Like I said earlier, this is a good movie, I had a really good time watching it. It's obviously not a complex movie, but it wasn't meant to be. Not every film can explore the more dramatic issues at the core of someone who truly goes through something like this. Not that anyone would, of course, but you know what I mean. I've always maintained the fact that films like this, more lighthearted and family friendly flicks, need to exist just as much as the arthouse films do. You gotta maintain a balance. The most memorable scene in the film would, obviously, have to be the piano floor mat scene. It's not the best scene in the movie, for sure, but it's certainly the most memorable one. It's a pretty cool scene regardless. Tom Hanks is great here, what a fucking surprise huh? He's perfect for the role because he's always had an everyman quality about him, but he's certainly not afraid to be goofy. The character in this movie seems more like Tom Hanks than, realistically speaking, any other character he's ever played. Not that he's a literal man-child, but just that he's a person who's not afraid to get outright goofy when he needs to. So, yes, he's great here. Elizabeth Perkins is good as well. The cast is strong all around, even if none of them have any real depth. This a well-written movie, for sure, the characters are likable, but they also do a good enough job at making you care about them. They don't do a great job, mind you, but they do it better than every Transformers film in existence. Having written this review, I honestly don't feel comfortable giving this film 3.5 stars. I can see how people would see this as a really good movie, but I felt it was missing more consistent laughs in order to get to that level. As it stands, this is still a good movie that I would certainly recommend if you've never seen it. It's good, Tom Hanks is great and the story is sweet.

Brian V (ag) wrote: Entertaining, but not great. This marks Sean Connery returning to the bond role after major differences with the producers leading to a different bond actor for "the spy who loved me." While it was great to see Connery back in the tux, it didn't seem like he was as into the role as he had been in previous appearances.

Adam R (ag) wrote: Summer Magic is an underrated yet must see live action Disney musical. You'll find a few of the best songs from the Sherman Brothers in this movie. Hayley Mills has her usual charm and Burl Ives is funny in the role of Osh Popham. It's a comforting film with a silver lining! (First viewing - Late 2009)

jay H (br) wrote: its kind of like a porn, you watch it for the action, not the acting.

RajanSatish P (kr) wrote: A neat family crime drama,very well acted by Joaquin Phoenix & Robert Duvall, except for the cinematic climax.

Marc K (br) wrote: This is a found footage movie and won't be for everyone but personally, it's one of my favorite horror movies. It's funny during the backstory section and is genuinely freaky during the rest of it.