A criminal organization has obtained two nuclear bombs and are asking for a 100 million pound ransom in the form of diamonds in seven days or they will use the weapons. The secret service sends James Bond to the Bahamas to once again save the world.

James Bond heads to The Bahamas to recover two nuclear warheads stolen by SPECTRE agent Emilio Largo in an international extortion scheme. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Thunderball torrent reviews

Paul D (it) wrote: A little rough and ready with the way it deals with the haunting of the semi-detached in Yorkshire, but the film makers have excelled with the look and ambiance of 1970's Britain

Pierre J (it) wrote: who ever made that movie have a special place reserved for him on the right side of Satan.Wasted of money

Rory O (mx) wrote: Why did I ever think this movie was ok....

victor l (br) wrote: I think this is a nice and faithful adaptation of the novel. Vanessa Redgrave is delighful as always and the rest of the performances are fine too. The only thing I didn't like very much was the production, looks poor.

Jeff D (ag) wrote: The Fat Boys are a lame relic of the 80s.

Ryan D (it) wrote: Loved it, cult classic still watch it with my kids and we can all quote it word for word

Radek C (de) wrote: An example of a film which drags at first, then slightly picks up in the middle so it can bore you to death at the end. No emotions & no action, a rather wasted potential, cause the historical background of the film could have been used to its advantage. Brandauer's performance deserves some recognition though.

Darren R (ca) wrote: I'm not a big fan of Gothic horror in general (despite desperately wanting to be), but this is easily one of the best examples of the genre. The cinematography is surprisingly good, and there is enough tasteful gore to keep modern audiences interested without being too grossed out. Sadly, the music is nothing more than adequate. Like the overwhelming majority of horror films, all of the good, innocent characters are frightfully dull, but on most technical levels this is a movie worth checking out.

Allison W (ag) wrote: I remember seeing the tail end of this movie when I was, maybe 14. I kept waiting for it to get boring, but surprisingly this old, black-and-white movie kept my attention the entire time. I sort of forgot about it for a while, but it's definitely one of my favorite movies.

Cheryl L (jp) wrote: Bing and Bob together again.Great team!

James C (ca) wrote: This has to be one of the most confusing films I have ever tried to give a rating. Unlike a film such as Primer or Inception which were complex but easily able to be seen as brilliant films this was simple in premise but I still can't decide whether this is a work of genius or terrible as far as plot is concerned. This can be down to the lack of considerable plot present in the film and the constant twisting and turning in the direction which the film actually takes. However, I can see the complexity in making a film like this into one with a definite plot as Duke is an unreliable narrator with the film being a culmination of his writing and work. Therefore, with him being drugged up throughout the film I believe it to be a form of Gonzo journalism which Hunter S Thompson was known for writing and so see the film as semi-autobiographical. Although the plot is one which I, through multiple viewings, still don't fully understand and so naturally would put the film in the middle regarding ratings, from the art style and humour of the film being constantly dark and busy with an interesting effect happening in every single scene I have to regard this film as more positive than negative. In my opinion this is a film any film lover should watch as it is interesting and not a pointless film as well as being different from any other film I have ever seen and in that sense is completely unique. Therefore, to conclude, with the acting being brilliant as well as the style of the film being definitively interesting I think anyone should watch this. I personally have to keep watching it for some reason even unknown to me.

Mike M (mx) wrote: A Comedy Drama, not an ambitious use of super power like Chronicle. It does have solid special effect for some sequences,

Richard D (us) wrote: Make no mistake about it: Bo Derek is the world's worst actress and her late husband John was the world's worst film maker. More famous efforts of theirs like "Bolero" and "Tarzan the Ape Man" attest to that, but none of their films captures the pure, transcendent magic of their combined awfulness like "Ghosts Can't Do It". Everything about it - the corpse-like acting, the hacky composition of every shot, the incoherent and disorienting editing, the jaw-dropping absurdity of Bo Derek's hats (the true stars of the movie) - is profoundly terrible, yet wonderfully, nay, beautifully hilarious. These two nimrods were never aware of how truly bad they were, but God bless them for it because their obliviousness leads to our entertainment. And I haven't even mentioned the funniest part of all: the fact that the implication of the entire movie's plot is that Bo winds up committing two acts of simultaneous necrophilia. And that's supposed to be sexy. "Ghosts Can't Do It" is so unfathomably awesome.