Matthieu and Eric are two brothers who work at the same factory as their father in Normandy. When his father is dismissed for smoking on the factory floor, Matthieu is incensed and tries to have him reinstated, in vain. His brother has just got married and, with a child and mortgage on the way, is reluctant to stir up trouble. Likewise, Matthieu's fellow workers refuse to get involved. Then ...
- Stars:Benoît Magimel, Nathalie Baye, Antoine Chappey, Fred Ulysse, Jean-Marie Winling, Françoise Bette, Mélanie Leray, Virginie Dessevre, Patrick Chauvel, Rémy Roubakha,
- Director:Xavier Beauvois,
- Writer:Cédric Anger, Xavier Beauvois, Catherine Breillat
Matthieu and Eric are two brothers who work at the same factory as their father in Normandy. When his father is dismissed for smoking on the factory floor, Matthieu is incensed and tries to have him reinstated, in vain. His brother has just got married and, with a child and mortgage on the way, is reluctant to stir up trouble. Likewise, Matthieu's fellow workers refuse to get involved. Then ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
To Matthieu torrent reviews
(au) wrote: At first, I was like, "Oh my God, this is so good. They are all incredible." But then at the end, I frowned and mumbled, "Wait, what's this!?"
(de) wrote: 3/2/2017: A really good and entertaining film. Wolverine was the main character, which was great. I would have liked to see more action from him though.
(jp) wrote: Decent flick for the young adult crowd.
(de) wrote: I guess it could've delved a little deeper into Black Panther culture than it did, but it's still a beautifully filmed, edited, scored, and acted piece of film.
(au) wrote: I'm one of the viewers who haven't seen the original, so I find this updated remake good with some tenses and strong acting. (B+)(Full review coming soon)
(us) wrote: Boy, if the movie is like the synopsis, it's going to be one generalization after another.
(mx) wrote: STANDARDIZED MOVIE EVALUATION (comments may contain spoilers) I. CONTENT (out of 3 stars plus bonus, composite of sub-criteria bellow): ---> 2.0 <--- i. PHILOSOPHICAL/PSYCHOLOGICAL DEPTH (out of 2 stars, where very shallow = 0; shallow = 0.25 or 0.5; somewhat deep = 0.75 or 1.0; deep = 1.25 or 1.5; very deep = 1.75 or 2.0)---> 1.25 <--- [color=#000000]That's one of the most minimalist movies I've seen in content and I like it ! [/color] ii. SCREENPLAY ORIGINALITY (out of 1 star, where very banal = 0; banal = 0.25; somewhat original = 0.5; original = 0.75; very original = 1.0):---> 0.75 <--- A bit of Soviet pioneer Propaganda felt. + BONUS FOR CONTAINING CONTROVERSIAL & UNPOPULAR TOPICS (up to 0.5 star, where controversial topics = 0.25; unpopular and taboo topics = 0.5) II. PRODUCTION (out of 2 stars plus bonus, composite of sub-criteria bellow): ---> 2.0 <--- iii. ACTING (out of 1 star, where very ineffective = 0; ineffective = 0.25; somewhat effective = 0.5; effective = 0.75; very effective = 1.0):---> 1.0 <--- The kid's acting is wonderful. iv. PRESENTATION (out of 1 star, where very ineffective = 0; ineffective = 0.25; somewhat effective = 0.5; effective = 0.75; very effective = 1.0): ---> 1.0 <--- Very compelling cinematography + BONUS FOR PRODUCING ON LOW BUDGET (up to 0.5 stars, where up to one million dollars budget = 0.25; up to half a million dollars budget = 0.5) TOTAL STAR RATING: ---> 4.0<--- GRADE & RECOMMENDATION (above 5.0 = A+," Very Good Movie, Highly Recommend"; 5.0 & 4.75 = A," Very Good Movie, Highly Recommend"; 4.5 = A-, " Very Good Movie, Highly Recommend"; 4.25 = B+, "Good Movie, Recommend"; 4.0 & 3.75 = B, "Good Movie, Recommend"; 3.5 = B - "Good Movie, Recommend"; 3.25 = = C+, "Fair Movie" ; 3.0 & 2.75 = C, "Fair Movie"; 2.5 = C-, "Fair Movie"; 2.25 = D+, "Poor Movie"; 2.0 & 1.75 = D, "Poor Movie"; 1.5 = D-, "Poor Movie"; bellow 1.5 = F, "Very Poor Movie") :---> B, " Good Movie, Recommend" <--- BALANCED MPAA RATING (not biased in favor of violence and against sexuality, where G = no violence, no sexuality; PG = OK slight violence, OK slight sexuality; PG-13 = OK moderate violence, OK moderate sexuality; R = OK explicit violence, OK explicit sexuality; NC-17 = OK extreme violence, OK extreme sexuality) ---> G<---
(fr) wrote: The amateur, unconvincing acting surprisingly adds to the film in a quirky sort of a way. The CGI dinosaurs and other mesozoic mosters are realistic enough not to look like a PS2 game. And the story-line, although trite and predictable, doesn't produce the kind of woeful boredom that so many Hollywood blockbusters do. Sure, it's as tacky and tedious as the name would suggest, but it's watchable, nonetheless. Worth a go; better than it could have been.
(fr) wrote: Es increible ver como an con tantos actores excelentes; el director Don Scaldino no logr hacer nada interesante con ellos, es una pelcula lenta, con 2 que 3 gags buenos en TODA la pelcula, y en resumen bizarra. Es una mezcolanza de humor en extremo extrao y una monotona constantemente presente. Que lastima, pudo haber sido una comedia muy bien hecha; pero eso pasa cuando el director es un completo pelele.
(au) wrote: I wanna watch it but its impossible to find a DVD
(br) wrote: This is the first Marvel movie that got me into the comics and, despite what most critics say, it's worth seeing again and again. Without Howard the Duck, other Marvel movies would never have been made decades later. Think about it.